On 2019-01-10 4:41 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> That is pretty good actually and even a positive
> point for emoji (if these were mere images you
> would get nothing out of it without extra tagging,
> and it would still lack the standardization).
> Nothing like what one gets from the math symbols
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 09:54:59PM +0530, Shriramana Sharma via Unicode wrote:
> On Thu 10 Jan, 2019, 20:49 Arthur Reutenauer via Unicode <
> unicode@unicode.org wrote:
>
> >
> > On this topic, I was just pointed to
> >
> > https://twitter.com/kentcdodds/status/1083073242330361856
> >
>
On Thu 10 Jan, 2019, 20:49 Arthur Reutenauer via Unicode <
unicode@unicode.org wrote:
>
> On this topic, I was just pointed to
>
> https://twitter.com/kentcdodds/status/1083073242330361856
>
> “You 혵혩혪혯혬 it's 풸퓊퓉ℯ to 현헿헶혁헲 your tweets and usernames
> 햙햍햎햘 햜햆햞. But
> have you 홡홞홨황홚홣홚홙
3 matches
Mail list logo