On Sunday, March 29, 2015, Andrew West andrewcw...@gmail.com wrote:
Having said that, I note that the
numeric value of one character has been reduced in the Unicode data:
U+2189 VULGAR FRACTION ZERO THIRDS is given the numeric value of 0
rather that 0/3.
Could that be because it's intended
On 03/31/2015 11:30 AM, Doug Ewell wrote:
Karl Williamson public at khwilliamson dot com wrote:
It's a small matter to add code to reduce the UCD-specified rational
numbers, but it's just one more complication to have to deal with
along with the many that the UCD already presents, and if there
Karl Williamson public at khwilliamson dot com wrote:
Is it a problem that DerivedNumericValues.txt doesn't match
UnicodeData.txt in this regard? (That is, the derived file comes with
irreducible rationals)
Not if you follow the loose matching rule UAX44-LM1 (see earlier
message) which says
Karl Williamson public at khwilliamson dot com wrote:
It's a small matter to add code to reduce the UCD-specified rational
numbers, but it's just one more complication to have to deal with
along with the many that the UCD already presents, and if there is not
a good reason the data for these
On 03/29/2015 03:41 AM, Andrew West wrote:
On 28 March 2015 at 20:05, Karl Williamson pub...@khwilliamson.com wrote:
Existing software that looks at the numeric values of characters is written
expecting that rational numbers will have been reduced to their lowest form.
That seems to be a
On 28 March 2015 at 20:05, Karl Williamson pub...@khwilliamson.com wrote:
Existing software that looks at the numeric values of characters is written
expecting that rational numbers will have been reduced to their lowest form.
That seems to be a rather rash statement. I have software
How would you note the numeric value property of the mathematical pi
symbol, if you use 0.5, assuming that it should be written as a single
decimal value without using any operator ?
You can't because there's an infinite number of decimals, unless you
explciitly says that the numeric property is
Unless there is a value in documenting the value of the numerator and
denominator, in which case this should be prominently explained in the
documentation. Or is that written down somewhere already?
A./
On 3/28/2015 1:05 PM, Karl Williamson wrote:
In the 8.0 Beta files, some numerical
On 03/28/2015 02:25 PM, Asmus Freytag (t) wrote:
Unless there is a value in documenting the value of the numerator and
denominator, in which case this should be prominently explained in the
documentation.
It seems to me that the character name provides sufficient documentation
of the
On 3/28/2015 1:05 PM, Karl Williamson wrote:
In the 8.0 Beta files, some numerical values are not reduced to their
lowest forms. Is there a compelling reason that
109FB;MEROITIC CURSIVE FRACTION SIX TWELFTHS;No;0;R6/12;N;
is not written as
109FB;MEROITIC CURSIVE FRACTION SIX
In the 8.0 Beta files, some numerical values are not reduced to their
lowest forms. Is there a compelling reason that
109FB;MEROITIC CURSIVE FRACTION SIX TWELFTHS;No;0;R6/12;N;
is not written as
109FB;MEROITIC CURSIVE FRACTION SIX TWELFTHS;No;0;R1/2;N;
given that there is
11 matches
Mail list logo
