On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 10:56:50 -0800, Leo Broukhis wrote:
> This prompts a question: for case conversion bijectivity in fr_FR
> locale, should there be "invisible accents"? E.g.
> déjà -> DE(combining invisible acute accent)JA(combining invisible
> grave accent) -> déjà
> whereas in fr_CA
This prompts a question: for case conversion bijectivity in fr_FR
locale, should there be "invisible accents"? E.g.
déjà -> DE(combining invisible acute accent)JA(combining invisible
grave accent) -> déjà
whereas in fr_CA locale, it is simply
déjà -> DÉJÀ -> déjà
Leo
On Wed, Dec 9,
Hello Marc,
On 2015/12/10 14:35, Marc Blanchet wrote:
This is an interesting example of a phenomenon that turns up in many
other contexts, too. A similar example is the use of accents on
upper-case letters in French in France where 'officially', upper-case
letters are written without accents.
Since the captial sharp s is easily available to the public, I see it popping up everywhere in
German publications, mostly in an all caps environment. I have a small collection of it (on paper).
The use of the capital sharp s in German is not only a historical artefact, it is recent and
Am 10.12.2015 um 08:57 schrieb Jörg Knappen:
> The use of the capital sharp s in German is not only a historical artefact,
> it is recent and modern.
some illustrations for that:
https://www.facebook.com/versaleszett/?fref=ts
Mit freundlichen Grüßen –
Andreas
Actually, MS Word offers an option to keep or drop accents when converting
lower case to upper case in its spell checker options. I comprehend to the
Turkish translation. They've got two different letter "i", one with and one
without the dot ("ı"). But that's all not pointing to the direction
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 11:19:36 +0100, Hans Meiser wrote:
After all, the "ß" is just a ligature of "ss" (or, to be precise: a ligature of "sz", originating
from old German fonts - see hyperlink below), so I suggest the rendered outcome of the capital "ß" to be just the same:
After all, the "ß" is just a ligature of "ss" (or, to be precise: a ligature of
"sz", originating from old German fonts - see hyperlink below), so I suggest
the rendered outcome of the capital "ß" to be just the same: A ligature of two
capital "S".
Here's a hyperlink to an old German font
Le 10/12/2015 05:32, Martin J. Dürst a écrit :
A similar example is the use of accents on upper-case letters in
French in France where 'officially', upper-case letters are written
without accents.
Actually, the official body in charge of this (Académie Française) has
always recommended
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 11:45:22 +0100, Frédéric Grosshans wrote:
>Le 10/12/2015 05:32, Martin J. Dürst a écrit :
>> A similar example is the use of accents on upper-case letters in
>> French in France where 'officially', upper-case letters are written
>> without accents.
We are welcome to look up
Bing is pathetic. It treats the letter as if it didn't exist
Google maps it to the lowercase, neither allows you to find sites
that use just that character.
A./
2015-12-10 5:32 GMT+01:00 Martin J. Dürst :
> This is an interesting example of a phenomenon that turns up in many other
> contexts, too. A similar example is the use of accents on upper-case
> letters in French in France where 'officially', upper-case letters are
>
On 12/10/2015 2:45 AM, Frédéric Grosshans wrote:
Le 10/12/2015 05:32, Martin J. Dürst a écrit :
A similar example is the use of accents on upper-case letters in
French in France where 'officially', upper-case letters are written
without accents.
Actually, the official body in charge of this
On 12/9/2015 11:57 PM, "Jörg Knappen"
wrote:
Since the captial sharp s is easily available to the
public, I see it popping up everywhere in
German publications, mostly in an all caps environment. I
have a small
Betreff: Proposal for German capital letter "ß"
Currently there is a vast problem trying to determine the lower case equivalent
of a capitalized German word like "MASSE".
This is due to the fact that an orthographic rule exists to convert lower case
letter "ß"
Currently there is a vast problem trying to determine the lower case equivalent
of a capitalized German word like "MASSE".
This is due to the fact that an orthographic rule exists to convert lower case
letter "ß" to upper case letters "SS". So after converting a word from lower
case to upper
My proposal is to introduce a capital letter equivalent of "ß" that's resembling two capital
"S" letters: "SS".
Actually, the capital ß is already included in Unicode (ẞ) because it was and
is used as a separate letter (not looking like SS), though only rarely. It is
now realised as a proper
On 12/9/2015 9:52 AM, Gerrit Ansmann
wrote:
After
the German spelling reform in 1996, "ß" then became a letter of
its own, and words containing the letter "ß" are no longer
equivalent to words containing an "ss" combination instead of
On Wed, 9 Dec 2015 19:55:24 +
Hans Meiser wrote:
> I see.
>
> Yet, the u+1E9E doesn't quite look like two capital "S". So any
> program implementing a conversion conforming to Unicode will
> currently display/print in a wrong result: "MAßE" instead of the
> correctly
On Wed, 09 Dec 2015 20:55:24 +0100, Hans Meiser wrote:
Yet, AFAIK, the current glyph would currently be considered an error.
See it like this: The point of spelling rules is to easy reading. However, the
use of SS for capital ß is rather obstrusive, as it is not exactly
2015-12-09 22:45 GMT+01:00 Richard Wordingham <
richard.wording...@ntlworld.com>:
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2015 19:55:24 +
> Hans Meiser wrote:
>
> > I see.
> >
> > Yet, the u+1E9E doesn't quite look like two capital "S". So any
> > program implementing a conversion conforming to
On 9 Dec 2015, at 20:57, Gerrit Ansmann wrote:
>> Proposal: Shouldn't the glyph be amended to match the natural language?
>
> Nothing of this is really natural. If you go by what most people do, you
> would have to write FUßBALL.
In my new edition of the first German
On 9 Dec 2015, at 22:57, Asmus Freytag (t) wrote:
>
>> In my new edition of the first German translation of “Alice’s Adventures in
>> Wonderland”, the editor and I made sure that the cakes said “Iẞ MICH!” and
>> not “Iß MICH!”. :-)
>
> And the correct spelling
On 12/09/2015 06:49 PM, Hans Meiser wrote:
Yes, they do it wrong because (1) they don't know better and (2) they let their
software convert lower case text into upper case (a feature nearly every
typographic software provides).
Yet, if we let the majority of illiterate people decide what's
On 12/9/2015 3:49 PM, Hans Meiser
wrote:
Yes, they do it wrong because (1) they don't know better and (2) they let their software convert lower case text into upper case (a feature nearly every typographic software provides).
Yet, if we let the majority of
On 12/9/2015 1:11 PM, Michael Everson
wrote:
On 9 Dec 2015, at 20:57, Gerrit Ansmann wrote:
Proposal: Shouldn't the glyph be amended to match the natural language?
Nothing of this is really
Yes, they do it wrong because (1) they don't know better and (2) they let their
software convert lower case text into upper case (a feature nearly every
typographic software provides).
Yet, if we let the majority of illiterate people decide what's right and what's
wrong we could as easily
On 2015/12/10 09:30, Mark E. Shoulson wrote:
I remember when we went through all this the first time around, encoding
ẞ in the first place. People were saying "But the Duden says no!!!" And
someone then pointed out, "Please close your Duden and cast your gaze
upon ITS FRONT COVER, where you
On 9 Dec 2015, at 23:32, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
On 2015/12/10 09:30, Mark E. Shoulson wrote:
I remember when we went through all this the first time around,
encoding
ẞ in the first place. People were saying "But the Duden says
no!!!" And
someone then pointed out, "Please close your Duden
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 06:16:35PM +0100, Frédéric Grosshans wrote:
> * use your own casing rule and add a ZWNJ (zero width non joiner character)
> such that ss↔SS and ß↔S+ZWNJ + S.
Wouldn’t ZWJ be a more logical choice given that he wants to “join” both
S’s into a single character.
Regards,
Wednesday, December 9, 2015 4:59 PM
To: Hans Meiser; unicode@unicode.org
Subject: AW: Proposal for German capital letter "ß"
Just have a look at
U+1E9E LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SHARP S
in the block Latin Extended Additional
http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U1E00.pdf
Latin Extended Ad
://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U1E00.pdf
Kind regards
*Von:*Unicode [mailto:unicode-boun...@unicode.org] *Im Auftrag von
*Hans Meiser
*Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 9. Dezember 2015 13:26
*An:* unicode@unicode.org
*Betreff:* Proposal for German capital letter "ß"
Currently there is a vast problem trying to
32 matches
Mail list logo