Richard Wordingham wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:00:32 +0100 (BST)
William_J_G Overington wjgo_10...@btinternet.com wrote:
Looking at the document
http://www.unicode.org/L2/L1999/99159.pdf
that has been mentioned, the four bracket characters are therein described
as follows.
4X1F O LEFT
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:54:29 +0100 (BST)
William_J_G Overington wjgo_10...@btinternet.com wrote:
Richard Wordingham wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:00:32 +0100 (BST)
William_J_G Overington wjgo_10...@btinternet.com wrote:
Looking at the document
http://www.unicode.org/L2/L1999/99159.pdf
On 8/25/2015 12:07 PM, Richard Wordingham wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:54:29 +0100 (BST)
William_J_G Overington wjgo_10...@btinternet.com wrote:
Richard Wordingham wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:00:32 +0100 (BST)
William_J_G Overington wjgo_10...@btinternet.com wrote:
Looking at the
Looking at the document
http://www.unicode.org/L2/L1999/99159.pdf
that has been mentioned, the four bracket characters are therein described as
follows.
4X1F O LEFT BRACKET, REVERSE SOLIDUS TOP CORNER
4X20 C RIGHT BRACKET, REVERSE SOLIDUS BOTTOM CORNER
4X21 O LEFT BRACKET, SOLIDUS BOTTOM CORNER
I must admit, although I have seen really lots of mathematical notations, I have never encountered
those particular brackets. I have no intuition how they should pair.
--Jrg Knappen
Gesendet:Samstag, 22. August 2015 um 18:35 Uhr
Von:Julian Bradfield jcb+unic...@inf.ed.ac.uk
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:00:32 +0100 (BST)
William_J_G Overington wjgo_10...@btinternet.com wrote:
Looking at the document
http://www.unicode.org/L2/L1999/99159.pdf
that has been mentioned, the four bracket characters are therein
described as follows.
4X1F O LEFT BRACKET, REVERSE SOLIDUS TOP
Thanks to everyone for your responses so far. In terms of my comment on
which brackets make intuitive pairs, I should perhaps have explained my
thought process more clearly. If one is to consider the possible origins of
these symbols, one likely idea is that they could be used to symbolise a
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 10:32:45 -0700
Asmus Freytag (t) asmus-...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
On 8/22/2015 9:35 AM, Julian Bradfield wrote:
There is no inherent meaning to the
order of codepoints, it's just convenience.
And for that reason, we have property files to explicitly give the
properties
On 8/22/2015 2:47 PM, Richard
Wordingham wrote:
But codepoints are normally orderly until they enter the ISO approval
process. Thereafter, disorder creeps in, and becomes ever more likely
as blocks fill up
Haha, good one.
. The
On 8/22/2015 9:35 AM, Julian Bradfield
wrote:
There is no inherent meaning to the
order of codepoints, it's just convenience.
And for that reason, we have property files to
explicitly give the properties rather than asking the user to "glean"
From: Nigel Small ni...@nigelsmall.com
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 17:08:48 +0100
I am looking for clarification on an aspect of Unicode bracket pairing,
specifically in relation to the following four characters:
298D; 2990; o # LEFT SQUARE BRACKET WITH TICK IN TOP CORNER
298E; 298F; c #
On 2015-08-22, Nigel Small ni...@nigelsmall.com wrote:
298D; 2990; o # LEFT SQUARE BRACKET WITH TICK IN TOP CORNER
298E; 298F; c # RIGHT SQUARE BRACKET WITH TICK IN BOTTOM CORNER
298F; 298E; o # LEFT SQUARE BRACKET WITH TICK IN BOTTOM CORNER
2990; 298D; c # RIGHT SQUARE BRACKET WITH TICK IN
12 matches
Mail list logo
