Re: Version linking?

2017-08-17 22:37 GMT+02:00 Richard Wordingham via Unicode < unicode@unicode.org>: > Thus, at the level of undisputable text, in Indic scripts there appears > to be no provision for the ordering of multiple left matras that are > to be stored in logical order (i.e. backing order) after the onset >

Re: Version linking?

Mark Davis ☕️: > > E5.0 did have the emoji properties of some 10.0 characters a bit ahead of > time, but only after they were completely locked down. This should be absolutely avoided in the future, because it was effectively the other way around: No changes to the beta characters were possible

Re: Version linking?

On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 18:34:56 +0530 Shriramana Sharma via Unicode wrote: > Thanks for your reply, but how can characters be used portably if they > are not part of the published standard yet? Or is it that hereafter > both Unicode Standard + Unicode Emoji Standard will be

Re: Version linking?

>Intermediate versions can't add any new characters, but can add sequences and properties, including "emojification" of existing characters. E.g. E4.0 didn't reference any characters from U10.0. It did recognize *sequences* of existing U9.0 characters. E5.0 did have the emoji properties of some

Re: Version linking?

Thanks for your reply, but how can characters be used portably if they are not part of the published standard yet? Or is it that hereafter both Unicode Standard + Unicode Emoji Standard will be parallelly portable or something like that? -- Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा

Re: Version linking?

​Emoji versions are (currently) on a somewhat faster schedule than Unicode : U10.0 — ​ ​ E5.0, ​E6.0​ ​ (TBD)​ U09.0 — E3.0 ​, E4.0 Intermediate versions can't add any new characters, but can add sequences and properties, including "emojification" of existing characters. ​ {phone} On Aug 17,