Antnio Martins-Tuvlkin schreef:
I'm referencing to a book entitled:
#1055;#1072;#1084;#1103;#1090;#1085;#1080;#1082;#1080;
(etc, which translates into
III )
I see that the the roman ordinal third can be encoded in a
couple of different ways:
- U+0049 U+0049 U+0049
- U+0406 U+0406
Pim Blokland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. Encoded like that it may *look* like a roman three, but two of
those are definitely not correct. Only U+2162 or its compatibility
decomposition, U+0049 U+0049 U+0049 should be used. The other two
are bad coding, just as using greek Iotas or
2 matches
Mail list logo
