Richard Wordingham wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:00:32 +0100 (BST)
William_J_G Overington wjgo_10...@btinternet.com wrote:
Looking at the document
http://www.unicode.org/L2/L1999/99159.pdf
that has been mentioned, the four bracket characters are therein described
as follows.
4X1F O LEFT
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:54:29 +0100 (BST)
William_J_G Overington wjgo_10...@btinternet.com wrote:
Richard Wordingham wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:00:32 +0100 (BST)
William_J_G Overington wjgo_10...@btinternet.com wrote:
Looking at the document
http://www.unicode.org/L2/L1999/99159.pdf
On 8/25/2015 12:07 PM, Richard Wordingham wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:54:29 +0100 (BST)
William_J_G Overington wjgo_10...@btinternet.com wrote:
Richard Wordingham wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:00:32 +0100 (BST)
William_J_G Overington wjgo_10...@btinternet.com wrote:
Looking at the
Looking at the document
http://www.unicode.org/L2/L1999/99159.pdf
that has been mentioned, the four bracket characters are therein described as
follows.
4X1F O LEFT BRACKET, REVERSE SOLIDUS TOP CORNER
4X20 C RIGHT BRACKET, REVERSE SOLIDUS BOTTOM CORNER
4X21 O LEFT BRACKET, SOLIDUS BOTTOM CORNER
@unicode.org
Betreff:Re: Square Brackets with Tick
On 2015-08-22, Nigel Small ni...@nigelsmall.com wrote:
298D; 2990; o # LEFT SQUARE BRACKET WITH TICK IN TOP CORNER
298E; 298F; c # RIGHT SQUARE BRACKET WITH TICK IN BOTTOM CORNER
298F; 298E; o # LEFT SQUARE BRACKET WITH TICK IN BOTTOM CORNER
2990
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:00:32 +0100 (BST)
William_J_G Overington wjgo_10...@btinternet.com wrote:
Looking at the document
http://www.unicode.org/L2/L1999/99159.pdf
that has been mentioned, the four bracket characters are therein
described as follows.
4X1F O LEFT BRACKET, REVERSE SOLIDUS TOP
Thanks to everyone for your responses so far. In terms of my comment on
which brackets make intuitive pairs, I should perhaps have explained my
thought process more clearly. If one is to consider the possible origins of
these symbols, one likely idea is that they could be used to symbolise a
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 10:32:45 -0700
Asmus Freytag (t) asmus-...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
On 8/22/2015 9:35 AM, Julian Bradfield wrote:
There is no inherent meaning to the
order of codepoints, it's just convenience.
And for that reason, we have property files to explicitly give the
properties
On 8/22/2015 2:47 PM, Richard
Wordingham wrote:
But codepoints are normally orderly until they enter the ISO approval
process. Thereafter, disorder creeps in, and becomes ever more likely
as blocks fill up
Haha, good one.
. The
On 8/22/2015 9:35 AM, Julian Bradfield
wrote:
There is no inherent meaning to the
order of codepoints, it's just convenience.
And for that reason, we have property files to
explicitly give the properties rather than asking the user to "glean"
Hi all
I am looking for clarification on an aspect of Unicode bracket pairing,
specifically in relation to the following four characters:
298D; 2990; o # LEFT SQUARE BRACKET WITH TICK IN TOP CORNER
298E; 298F; c # RIGHT SQUARE BRACKET WITH TICK IN BOTTOM CORNER
298F; 298E; o # LEFT SQUARE
From: Nigel Small ni...@nigelsmall.com
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 17:08:48 +0100
I am looking for clarification on an aspect of Unicode bracket pairing,
specifically in relation to the following four characters:
298D; 2990; o # LEFT SQUARE BRACKET WITH TICK IN TOP CORNER
298E; 298F; c #
On 2015-08-22, Nigel Small ni...@nigelsmall.com wrote:
298D; 2990; o # LEFT SQUARE BRACKET WITH TICK IN TOP CORNER
298E; 298F; c # RIGHT SQUARE BRACKET WITH TICK IN BOTTOM CORNER
298F; 298E; o # LEFT SQUARE BRACKET WITH TICK IN BOTTOM CORNER
2990; 298D; c # RIGHT SQUARE BRACKET WITH TICK IN
At 17:08 -0700 2001-10-08, Rick McGowan wrote:
I saw your examples of these the other day in Greek text. The upper
corners also occur widely. For example, they occur in Kenkyusha's
Pocket Japanese English dictionary (and others) to denote syllabic
stress. They are precisely the same kind
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001 18:32:05 -0700 (PDT), Kenneth Whistler wrote:
This would definitely not work. The problem is that while the CJK
left/right corner brackets are clearly bracketing punctuation, you
have to contend with their other properties as CJK punctuation. Most
systems will default them to
At 08:25 -0400 2001-10-09, From Net Link wrote:
I think the arithmetic set of symbols should be extended with more
parenthesis.
Provide data regarding the use of such parentheses and propose them.
--
Michael Everson *** Everson Typography *** http://www.evertype.com
15 Port Chaeimhghein
under
ballot and will be included in Unicode 3.2 in the near future:
white curly brackets
white parentheses
z notation image brackets
z notation binding brackets
square brackets with underbar
square brackets with tick in (top/bottom) corners
angle brackets with dot
black tortoise shell brackets
See
Nick, et al -- You mentioned:
> In Classical scholarship (and I suspect, beyond it), all
> four possible corner brackets are routinely used as punctuation
> to delimit text in some way ---
I saw your examples of these the other day in Greek text. The upper corners also occur widely. For
Those are terminal graphics pieces, designed to be used with vertical
extenders to create large square brackets on terminals or similar
contexts. But as symbols, they will look much like the ceilings and
floors.
23BE, 23BF, 23CB, 23CC: DENTISTRY SYMBOL LIGHT VERTICAL AND TOP RIGHT, BR, TL, BL
19 matches
Mail list logo
