On Fri, Nov 25 2016 at 15:38 CET, jsb...@mimuw.edu.pl writes:
> Hi!
>
> There are two comments to the character(s) in the U0180 chart:
>
> 1. Pan-Turkic Latin orthography
[...]
On Mon, Nov 28 2016 at 16:48 CET, kenwhist...@att.net writes:
> On 11/25/2016 10:20 PM, Janusz S. Bień wrote:
>
>
On 11/25/2016 10:20 PM, Janusz S. Bień wrote:
Now there is a follow-up question: why the character was included in
Unicode 1.1.0?
Well, it was included in Unicode 1.1 because it was published in Unicode
1.0 already. So that is the proximate reason.
That inevitably will raise the question,
Thanks for all the interesting asnwers. I will focus now on my first
question.
On Fri, Nov 25 2016 at 15:38 CET, jsb...@mimuw.edu.pl writes:
> Hi!
>
> There are two comments to the character(s) in the U0180 chart:
>
> 1. Pan-Turkic Latin orthography
> 2. handwritten variant of Latin “z”
>
> Ad
And the cursive form of uppercase Z also has a stroke to distinguish it
from the cursive form of uppercase L... So this is not just for maths.
2016-11-25 16:05 GMT+01:00 "Jörg Knappen" :
> Some anecdotal evidence:
>
> I was taught by my math teacher (Germany, 1970s) to stroke
Le 25/11/2016 à 15:38, Janusz S. Bień a écrit :
Hi!
There are two comments to the character(s) in the U0180 chart:
1. Pan-Turkic Latin orthography
2. handwritten variant of Latin “z”
Ad 1.
Do I understand correctly that the Pan-Turkic Latin ortography
refers to the initiative described in
uw.edu.pl>
An: "unicode Unicode Discussion" <unicode@unicode.org>
Betreff: The usage of Z WITH STROKE
Hi!
There are two comments to the character(s) in the U0180 chart:
1. Pan-Turkic Latin orthography
2. handwritten variant of Latin “z”
Ad 1.
Do I understand correctly t
Hi!
There are two comments to the character(s) in the U0180 chart:
1. Pan-Turkic Latin orthography
2. handwritten variant of Latin “z”
Ad 1.
Do I understand correctly that the Pan-Turkic Latin ortography
refers to the initiative described in the post to the Linguist list:
7 matches
Mail list logo