* Lars Marius Garshol
|
| Well, that's what I thought, anyway. But now my Japanese colleagues
| tell me that Japanese users sometimes have to define their own
| characters in their own fonts in order to be able to write some
| characters they may need (for example to write their own name), and
|
In a message dated 2002-01-19 9:33:46 Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has there been any consideration of practical alternatives, such as
selecting a lookalike or similar character from the plethora of those
already encoded and promoting its use to represent the newpi
At 13:32 -0500 2002-01-19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2002-01-19 9:33:46 Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has there been any consideration of practical alternatives, such as
selecting a lookalike or similar character from the plethora of those
already encoded
In a message dated 2002-01-19 11:35:57 Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Could one of these characters,
already approved and part of Unicode, be adopted to represent 2pi?
That's up the the AMS, not to us.
Indeed. It might be a good topic for the AMS discussion forum that
Iwould be grateful if I could get opinions on
the following:
1. Which encoding/character set is most suitable
for using Hindi/Marathi (both of which use Devanagari) on the internet as well
asin databases, and why? In your response, please refer to:
Robert Palais wrote,
My own proposal was a pictogram: A circle with a radius to 3 o'clock,
i.e. from 0 to 1 in the complex number plane. Pacman with mouth closed.
Does that already exist in Unicode? :-) My dad's version is a lot more
palatable for most people.
Couldn't find such a
6 matches
Mail list logo
