On 6/20/2012 8:09 PM, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Ken Whistlerk...@sybase.com wrote:
I don't see any necessary correlation between what sequences
people might end up insisting on naming (for whatever reason) and what
people might consider to be graphemes.
I
On 21 Jun 2012, at 04:09, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Ken Whistler k...@sybase.com wrote:
I don't see any necessary correlation between what sequences
people might end up insisting on naming (for whatever reason) and what
people might consider to be graphemes.
Today I received from Lulu the Unicode Standard 6.1 -Core specification
http://www.lulu.com/shop/unicode-consortium/the-unicode-standard-version-61-core-specification/paperback/product-20082926.html
.
While I am very glad to have this, I really do wonder why there was not a full
publication of
On 21 Jun 2012, at 09:47, Raymond Mercier wrote:
While I am very glad to have this, I really do wonder why there was not a
full publication of Unicode 6 or 6.1 from the corporation itself, with all
the charts, as we have had with Unicode 1 to 5. Surely there is a market for
this ?
Perhaps
From: Michael Everson everson_at_evertype.com
On 21 Jun 2012, at 09:47, Raymond Mercier wrote:
While I am very glad to have this, I really do wonder why there was not a
full publication of Unicode 6 or 6.1 from the corporation itself, with all
the charts, as we have had with Unicode 1 to
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Asmus Freytag asm...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
But the point is not just the sequence, but also the name for it. What do
you propose?
Well I couldn't propose a name conforming to the naming rules without
revealing what was munged up, could I? :-)
On Thu, Jun 21,
On 2012-06-21, Michael Everson ever...@evertype.com wrote:
On 21 Jun 2012, at 09:47, Raymond Mercier wrote:
While I am very glad to have this, I really do wonder why there was not a
full publication of Unicode 6 or 6.1 from the corporation itself, with all
the charts, as we have had with
Michael Everson:
Perhaps less than us character mavens would imagine. Books don't publish
themselves, and publishing takes resources of various kinds.
Julian Bradfield:
Not much, if they use the Lulu route, as they already have an account
set up. An hour of somebody's time should do it.
And at
At the price of this lulu edition, I would have happily bought also an
edition with charts and standard annexes, scaled proportionally.
Would it be possible to know the sales figures of this edition? Only
to understand if the effort for the pubblication has been worthwhile.
And the sales
On 21 Jun 2012, at 13:26, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote:
And the sales figures of the previous versions?
Everybody,
The Powers That Be are looking into it, and discussion on this list isn't going
to provide new information unavailable to The Powers.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
On 6/21/2012 3:22 AM, Julian Bradfield wrote:
Not much, if they use the Lulu route, as they already have an account
set up. An hour of somebody's time should do it.
And at a Lulu price, there'll be a lot more of a market than at an
Addison-Wesley price!
The Unicode Standard easily uses
OK. Will they always be in NFC?
To apply Ken's dictume to this case:
That seems like a straitjacket looking for an unwilling wearer. ;-)
Unless it's excluded from the start, anytime you limit it, when the time
comes you need something like that, you have to invent a new
On 06/21/2012 01:45 PM, Asmus Freytag wrote:
OK. Will they always be in NFC?
To apply Ken's dictume to this case:
That seems like a straitjacket looking for an unwilling wearer. ;-)
Unless it's excluded from the start, anytime you limit it, when the time
comes you need something
On 6/21/2012 7:51 PM, Karl Williamson wrote:
On 06/21/2012 01:45 PM, Asmus Freytag wrote:
OK. Will they always be in NFC?
To apply Ken's dictume to this case:
That seems like a straitjacket looking for an unwilling wearer. ;-)
Unless it's excluded from the start, anytime you
On 6/21/2012 2:56 AM, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Asmus Freytagasm...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
But the point is not just the sequence, but also the name for it. What do
you propose?
Well I couldn't propose a name conforming to the naming rules without
revealing what
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Asmus Freytag asm...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
U+ MARK D A V I S :) :) ;)
(incidentally, it would be equivalent to the more pithy U+ MARK DAVIS
as spaces are ignored in character names... )
Heh -- don't you think that should be DAVIS MARK? :-)
Precedents
16 matches
Mail list logo
