Tim Partridge wrote:
> Perhaps the CLDR work the Consortium does is being referenced. That is
> by language on this list
> http://www.unicode.org/cldr/charts/32/supplemental/locale_coverage.html#ee
> By the time it gets to the 100th entry the Modern percentage has "room
> for improvement".
I
Perhaps the CLDR work the Consortium does is being referenced. That is by
language on this list
http://www.unicode.org/cldr/charts/32/supplemental/locale_coverage.html#ee By
the time it gets to the 100th entry the Modern percentage has "room for
improvement".
Regards,
Tim
Here's a good opening line:
"The Unicode Standard encodes scripts rather than languages."
https://www.unicode.org/standard/supported.html
But, quoting from this page:
http://www.unicode.org/consortium/aboutdonations.html
" ... and provide universal access for the world's languages—past,
Christoph Päper wrote,
>> There are approximately 7,000 living human languages,
>> but fewer than 100 of these languages are well-supported on computers,
>> ...
>
> Why is the announcement mentioning those numbers of languages at all?
> The script coverage of written living human languages,
4 matches
Mail list logo
