Re: Is ARMENIAN ABBREVIATION MARK (՟, U+055F) misclassified?

2019-04-26 Thread James Kass via Unicode
On 2019-04-26 11:08 PM, Doug Ewell via Unicode wrote: This is a small percentage of the number of fonts that have all four of these Armenian glyphs, but show the abbreviation mark as a spacing glyph. It looks like Unicode is right, Wikipedia is right, and the fonts are wrong. If the

Re: Is ARMENIAN ABBREVIATION MARK (՟, U+055F) misclassified?

2019-04-26 Thread Doug Ewell via Unicode
Fredrick Brennan wrote: > Although my research on this has by no means been exhaustive, it > seems at a cursory glance that the «pativ», the Armenian abbreviation > mark, is misclassified; it seems it should either be itself a > combining mark or have a combining mark version. > > I have not been