Le 30/05/12 06:26, Jean-François Colson a écrit :
Le 28/05/12 22:53, Doug Ewell a écrit :
Karl Pentzlin wrote:
As said in an earlier posting, the part 9995-9 is now in DIS, which
means that its final version will be published 2013 or 2014. Thus,
national standards referring to this part will
On Tue, 29 May 2012 12:52:12 -0700
Doug Ewell d...@ewellic.org wrote:
And yes, of course it's possible to stack an entire new layer on top
of the existing Windows key architecture, as Keyman does. Maybe that
is the long-term solution, but I haven't heard that MS is planning to
go that route.
On 2012-05-28, Doug Ewell d...@ewellic.org wrote:
...
Again, just speaking about one platform (Windows) that seems to be in
somewhat common use, the problem is that the underlying architecture
doesn't support multiple dead keys on a single base character, nor does
it support a fifth, sixth,
Some of the features in those keyboard standards seem of sufficient
complexity that I can't imagine anyone other than specially trained
typists to ever be using them. That would presumably dampen the
enthusiasm of anybody in the business of catering to average users.
I'm basing that on
On May 29, 2012, at 5:30 AM, Asmus Freytag wrote:
Some of the features in those keyboard standards seem of sufficient
complexity that I can't imagine anyone other than specially trained typists
to ever be using them.
Indeed, I suspect the future may lie elsewhere than in creating more
Am Dienstag, 29. Mai 2012 um 11:30 schrieb Asmus Freytag:
AF Some of the features in those keyboard standards seem of sufficient
AF complexity that I can't imagine anyone other than specially trained
AF typists to ever be using them.
Exactly this user group is the primary audience for whom at
2012/5/28 Karl Pentzlin karl-pentz...@acssoft.de:
Am Montag, 28. Mai 2012 um 19:02 schrieb Doug Ewell:
DE ISO/IEC 9995-9 cannot be implemented natively on Microsoft Windows; it
DE requires a third-party add-on package such as Keyman, which is not free.
It is too early to blame Microsoft (or
Philippe Verdy verdy underscore p at wanadoo dot fr wrote:
DE ISO/IEC 9995-9 cannot be implemented natively on Microsoft
DE Windows; it requires a third-party add-on package such as Keyman,
DE which is not free.
It is too early to blame Microsoft (or anybody else) on this.
I do agree. When
2012/5/29 Doug Ewell d...@ewellic.org:
Philippe Verdy verdy underscore p at wanadoo dot fr wrote:
Did you read what I wrote? The *underlying architecture* of Windows key
handling supports neither additional shift states nor multiple dead
keys, both of which are required to support this
On 2012-05-29, Doug Ewell d...@ewellic.org wrote:
Did you read what I wrote? The *underlying architecture* of Windows key
handling supports neither additional shift states nor multiple dead
keys, both of which are required to support this standard. A new version
of MSKLC on top of the existing
Julian Bradfield jcb plus unicode at inf dot ed dot ac dot uk wrote:
Did you read what I wrote? The *underlying architecture* of Windows
key handling supports neither additional shift states nor multiple
dead keys, both of which are required to support this standard. A new
version of MSKLC on
Le 28/05/12 22:53, Doug Ewell a écrit :
Karl Pentzlin wrote:
As said in an earlier posting, the part 9995-9 is now in DIS, which
means that its final version will be published 2013 or 2014. Thus,
national standards referring to this part will hardly be published
before 2015.
Thus, there is
Le 28/05/12 22:53, Doug Ewell a écrit :
Karl Pentzlin wrote:
As said in an earlier posting, the part 9995-9 is now in DIS, which
means that its final version will be published 2013 or 2014. Thus,
national standards referring to this part will hardly be published
before 2015.
Thus, there is
Karl Pentzlin replied to Jukka K. Korpela:
JKK I don’t think there will be any standard on [how to type INDIAN
RUPEE SIGN on a U.S. English keyboard].
It is contained in the draft of ISO/IEC 9995-9 Multilingual,
Multiscript Keyboard Group Layouts which is currently being submitted
to DIS
On 2012-05-28, Doug Ewell d...@ewellic.org wrote:
Karl Pentzlin replied to Jukka K. Korpela:
JKK I don’t think there will be any standard on [how to type INDIAN
RUPEE SIGN on a U.S. English keyboard].
It is contained in the draft of ISO/IEC 9995-9 Multilingual,
Multiscript Keyboard Group
Am Montag, 28. Mai 2012 um 19:02 schrieb Doug Ewell:
DE ISO/IEC 9995-9 cannot be implemented natively on Microsoft Windows; it
DE requires a third-party add-on package such as Keyman, which is not free.
It is too early to blame Microsoft (or anybody else) on this.
The ISO/IEC 9995 series does
Julian Bradfield wrote:
ISO/IEC 9995-9 cannot be implemented natively on Microsoft Windows;
it requires a third-party add-on package such as Keyman, which is
not free.
I don't understand this remark. Microsoft Windows is not free, so what
does it matter whether there's a free addon or not?
Karl Pentzlin wrote:
As said in an earlier posting, the part 9995-9 is now in DIS, which
means that its final version will be published 2013 or 2014. Thus,
national standards referring to this part will hardly be published
before 2015.
Thus, there is enough time for any manufacturer of
18 matches
Mail list logo
