We've got the example of the ISO 9 standard itself.
Le 5 mars 2012 22:46, Michael Everson ever...@evertype.com a écrit :
On 5 Mar 2012, at 20:13, Benjamin M Scarborough wrote:
There is a clear precedent here that the unifications of N2463 are not
necessarily the final fate of any of these
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Philippe Verdy verd...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
I am looking for the codes or assignements status of the Cyrillic
letter OE/oe (ligatured) as used in Selkup (exactly similar to the
Latin pair).
This character pair has been part of the registration nr. 223 (in
1998)
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 19:35, Denis Jacquerye wrote:
According to ftp://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/WG2/docs/n2463.doc the
Cyrillic Selkup OE is mapped to Latin OE:
CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER SELKUP O E to U+0153 LATIN SMALL LIGATURE OE
CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER SELKUP O E to U+0152 LATIN CAPITAL LIGATURE
Le 5 mars 2012 19:35, Denis Jacquerye moy...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Philippe Verdy verd...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
I am looking for the codes or assignements status of the Cyrillic
letter OE/oe (ligatured) as used in Selkup (exactly similar to the
Latin pair).
This
On 5 Mar 2012, at 20:13, Benjamin M Scarborough wrote:
There is a clear precedent here that the unifications of N2463 are not
necessarily the final fate of any of these characters. If the О Е letter for
Selkup should be disunified from U+0152/U+0153, then a proposal needs to be
submitted
I am looking for the codes or assignements status of the Cyrillic
letter OE/oe (ligatured) as used in Selkup (exactly similar to the
Latin pair).
This character pair has been part of the registration nr. 223 (in
1998) by ISO of the (8-bit) extended Cyrillic character set for
non-Slavic languages
6 matches
Mail list logo
