Text rendering of emojis (was: Re: First bonafide use (≠ mention) of emoji by an academic publisher?)

2017-07-24 Thread Leonardo Boiko via Unicode
Speaking of which—sorry if this is going off-topic, but I don't know where else could I ask—I don't think there's a way to configure Linux or Android systems to always prefer text rendering for emojis, is there? (I love text emojis.) 2017-07-24 16:24 GMT+02:00 Christoph Päper via Unicode

Re: First bonafide use (≠ mention) of emoji by an academic publisher?

2017-07-24 Thread Christoph Päper via Unicode
Leonardo Boiko: > > It would just be more > satisfying for me if the blue books were encoded in the font as U+1F4D8s, > rather than U+F02Ds. Or, if the colors are done at a CSS level, as  > U+1F4D5 CLOSED BOOKs or the like. Same goes for the other icons in FA > which *do *have an emoji

Re: First bonafide use (≠ mention) of emoji by an academic publisher?

2017-07-24 Thread Leonardo Boiko via Unicode
I don't have anything against that, in principle. It would just be more satisfying for me if the blue books were encoded in the font as U+1F4D8s, rather than U+F02Ds. Or, if the colors are done at a CSS level, as  U+1F4D5 CLOSED BOOKs or the like. Same goes for the other icons in FA which *do

Re: First bonafide use (≠ mention) of emoji by an academic publisher?

2017-07-23 Thread Doug Ewell via Unicode
Leonardo Boiko wrote: To my boundless, heartbreaking disappointment, these emojis are not U+1F4D8 BLUE BOOKs  from a custom @css font, but rather private-use U+F02Ds, which index a book glyph in some icon pack called Font Awesome . At least they're