On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 00:08:52 +
James Kass via Unicode wrote:
> On 2019-04-26 11:08 PM, Doug Ewell via Unicode wrote:
> > This is a small percentage of the number of fonts that have all
> > four of these Armenian glyphs, but show the abbreviation mark as a
> > spacing glyph. It looks like
On 2019-04-26 11:08 PM, Doug Ewell via Unicode wrote:
This is a small percentage of the number of fonts that have all four of these
Armenian glyphs, but show the abbreviation mark as a spacing glyph. It looks
like Unicode is right, Wikipedia is right, and the fonts are wrong.
If the
Fredrick Brennan wrote:
> Although my research on this has by no means been exhaustive, it
> seems at a cursory glance that the «pativ», the Armenian abbreviation
> mark, is misclassified; it seems it should either be itself a
> combining mark or have a combining mark version.
>
> I have not been
Although my research on this has by no means been exhaustive, it seems at a
cursory glance that the «pativ», the Armenian abbreviation mark, is
misclassified; it seems it should either be itself a combining mark or have a
combining mark version.
I have not been able to find a single Unicode
4 matches
Mail list logo
