Re: Results of public Review Issues (in particular #121)

2010-08-07 Thread Markus Scherer
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Kenneth Whistler k...@sybase.com wrote: What I now would like to know is what became of the UTC tentative preference for option #2, and where this is documented, Unicode 5.2, Chapter 3: http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode5.2.0/ch03.pdf pp. 94 - 95,

Results of public Review Issues (in particular #121)

2010-08-03 Thread Martin J. Dürst
Dear Unicode Experts, In a discussion about a new protocol, there was some issue about how to replace illegal bytes in UTF-8 with U+FFFD. That let me remember that there was once a Public Review Issue about this, and that as a result, I added something to the Ruby (programming language)

Re: Results of public Review Issues (in particular #121)

2010-08-03 Thread Kenneth Whistler
Martin, In a discussion about a new protocol, there was some issue about how to replace illegal bytes in UTF-8 with U+FFFD. That let me remember that there was once a Public Review Issue about this, and that as a result, I added something to the Ruby (programming language) codebase. I