At 12:43 PM 1/27/02 -0800, Mark Davis \(jtcsv\) wrote:
It sounds like what you are saying, in concrete terms, is that Font #6
at the bottom of:
http://www.macchiato.com/utc/variation_selection/variation_selection_f
ollowup.htm
is conformant. If that is so, then we would have to have an
At 12:33 AM 1/27/02 -0800, Mark Davis \(jtcsv\) wrote:
I find it fairly pointless to say that a font supports the variation
selection sequence U+03B8, U+FE00 if it does not provide a visual
distinction from U+03B8; and such a distinction should be based on the
entry description. Thus, of the
://oss.software.ibm.com/cgi-bin/icu/tr]
http://www.macchiato.com
- Original Message -
From: Asmus Freytag [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mark Davis (jtcsv) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 01:36
Subject: Re: Variation Selection (Was Re: Unicode 3.2: BETA files updated)
Now this message
(Was Re: Unicode 3.2: BETA files
updated)
At 12:33 AM 1/27/02 -0800, Mark Davis \(jtcsv\) wrote:
I find it fairly pointless to say that a font supports the
variation
selection sequence U+03B8, U+FE00 if it does not provide a
visual
distinction from U+03B8; and such a distinction should be based
4 matches
Mail list logo