RE: [UC] SPAM

2003-02-11 Thread Mayer, Ann
Re the SPAM: Could we subdivide our list, having one list for NON-commercial communications and a second that would comprise commercial info? Then subscribers who ONLY want the NON-commercial emails would have an option to avoid the commercial solicitations. Would that help? Ann Mayer 4312 Pine

RE: [UC] SPAM

2003-02-11 Thread S. Sharrieff Ali
Thanx Ann: New list can always be created if needed. I am speaking about the quality of the one we currently have. As in all things in life, people decide what is appropriate and representative of themselves. S. -Original Message- From: Mayer, Ann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

[UC] the implications of sending rice to the president

2003-02-11 Thread Tony Lapp
Title: [UC] the implications of sending rice to the president Natch that I'd sound all high-and-mighty-clean-up-your-post-y, then have my post come through with the website cut into pieces. The universe bends toward justice. Coitanly (soft c) does. J Let me try again, to see if it works

RE: [UC] SPAM

2003-02-11 Thread Karen E. Heenan
My 2 cents: I have no problem receiving email from the listserv, whatever my neighbors want to say. If I'm not interested or I don't want to read it, the listserv, and all of our computers, comes with a filter. It's called delete. Karen -Original Message- From: S. Sharrieff Ali

Re: [UC] SPAM

2003-02-11 Thread John Ellingsworth
. . . and most email(er)s include a Subject. I have received some fascistic replies to my posts that lead me to believe that some prefer this list to be moderated. I know all of my posts are entirely relevant to everyone, no exceptions ;) Thanks, John Ellingsworth Project Leader Virtual

Re: [UC] the implications of sending rice to the president

2003-02-11 Thread Brian Siano
Tony Lapp wrote: Ouch! Debra, your message hurt my eyes! Couldn't you have cleaned it up before sending it on? Do that again and I may be tempted to send rice to President Bush but throw rice at you! :-) Sending bowls of rice to Dubya sounds like a cute idea. And the inclusion of a Bible

RE: [UC] SPAM

2003-02-11 Thread Knight, Sandra (US - Philadelphia)
May I add my 2 cents to Karen's 2 cents. I agree with what she says. Sande Knight Deloitte Touche Assurance and Advisory Services tel 215-246-2424 fax 215-405-3178 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Karen E. Heenan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11,

Re: [UC] SPAM

2003-02-11 Thread R. Hotchkiss
Ditto. -- Richard Hotchkiss http://www.hotstrings-inc.com Knight, Sandra (US - Philadelphia) wrote: May I add my 2 cents to Karen's 2 cents. I agree with what she says. Sande Knight Deloitte Touche Assurance and Advisory Services tel 215-246-2424 fax 215-405-3178 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[UC] Tankless hot water heaters

2003-02-11 Thread David Nicklin
Anyone have first-hand experience with on-demand (tankless) gas hot water heaters? You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see http://www.purple.com/list.html.

RE: [UC] SPAM

2003-02-11 Thread S. Sharrieff Ali
. If I'm not interested or I don't want to read it, the listserv, and all of our computers, comes with a filter. It's called delete. The point is why should anyone compose and send unsolicited marketing e-mail to a discussion listserv when they realize it is contrary to the purpose, only to have

[UC] re: Spam

2003-02-11 Thread S. Sharrieff Ali
I promise to be brief no matter how long it takes. By the way. It is also not net savvy to use your work related e-mail address on a discussion listserv unless it is specifically sanctioned by your employer or you are subscribed to a profession related list such as Penn's Faculty and Staff

Re: [UC] Tankless hot water heaters

2003-02-11 Thread Jeff Abrahamson
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 06:06:02PM -0500, David Nicklin wrote: Anyone have first-hand experience with on-demand (tankless) gas hot water heaters? I've used them in Europe, the good ones can work quite well. No experience in the States, so I can't recommend brands or contractors. The bad ones

Re: [UC] SPAM

2003-02-11 Thread Gerardo Razumney
I don't think it is a fair characterization to use the word 'marketing' in reference to a single announcement by one individual of something they want to sell and that it may be of interest to others in the neighborhood. We are not talking about a commercial outfit taking advantage of the