Hi, Al.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 06:46:21PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many (maybe all) parts of University City could use more off-street parking
and more well-maintained open space
One of the fundamental points of Saidel's tax reform plan is that
taxing land instead of development on
I meant to raise 'parking' as an example, not as a point in and of itself.
Let's shift to the more fundamental question...
Are there uses of land in particular neighborhoods -- say University City --
that serve societal interests better if the owners don't erect buildings on
them? That is, if
I agree with Roger Harmon, Melanie, and others that it was a good meeting. I
do wonder why so few people show up at these things -- Roger estimated 70, I
thought it was a bit higher, maybe 100 by about 8:00. This sort of thing has
important implications; the territory represented by the
Many thanks to about 70 people who came to tonight's meeting
at Calvary Church with City ComptrollerJonathan Siedel and Councilwoman
Jannie Blackwell, about proposed changes in the city's tax code, in particular
ideas to move in the direction of more "Land Tax" and less "Property
Tax."A
