Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
Al Krigman told me that
the proponents at SHCA, UCHS, and the Historical Commission have
refused to participate.
All cat-calling aside, can anyone from SHCA or UCHS comment on this?
I'd like to think it's well-meaning error on Al's part. I'd find it
disturbing if
Richard Welter wrote:
I can say this, I was at the meeting on Tuesday night when Al proposed that
someone from SHCA come to the debate, and they refused, saying they found
the current process that the Historic Society used to be sufficient. They
claim no other venue is needed.
no other venue
Dear list,
let's review the process , this is from the UCHS site listed below.
Al's proposed meeting is redundant.
How is a Philadelphia Historic District created?
Working with local community and historic preservation groups, the
Historic Designation Committee of the Commission undertakes a
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 16:17:42 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Chris Hibbard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [UC] open community meeting
Cc:
Bcc:
X-Attachments:
In a message dated 3/17/02 2:54:41 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Commission holds several sessions
This strikes me as odd to conclude that the existence of hearings
makes debates are redundant. Shall we not discuss it on this list and
choose not to talk about it with friends and neighbors just because
the hearings are designed to allow for feedback and information?
I'd say it's a sign of a
