Should we start switching our portlets over as well?
On Aug 12, 2012, at 9:16 PM, Eric Dalquist eric.dalqu...@doit.wisc.edu wrote:
I'd like to switch from commons-logging + log4j to slf4j + logback in 4.1.
SLF4j has bridge APIs so no code needs to change just our pom and logging
config.
I'd be all for that, there is no interdependency but consistent logging
configuration is always nice. If you keep poking me I'll writeup a
little how to switch page since there are a few helpful tricks to make
sure commons-logging and log4j stay out of the project.
-Eric
On 08/13/2012 11:53
I'd like to switch from commons-logging + log4j to slf4j + logback in
4.1. SLF4j has bridge APIs so no code needs to change just our pom and
logging config. Logback is easier to configure and includes a
java.util.logging bridge which is handy for a few libraries we use. I
have the work done in