Re: [Ur] Default settings using a generic record update

2019-10-29 Thread Mark Clements
Adam: thank you for your prompt reply. To define defaultSettings properly, is there some way to constraint the type union (keep ++ change) to an existing type (e.g. {A:int, B:int})? The following also do not work: fun defaultSetting [keep] [change] [keep ~ change] (args : $change)

Re: [Ur] Default settings using a generic record update

2019-10-29 Thread Ziv Scully
One can capture subset constraints using a type class, as the following module does: https://github.com/vizziv/UrLib/blob/master/UrLib/subset.urs https://github.com/vizziv/UrLib/blob/master/UrLib/subset.ur (It relies on another module, Eq, from the same project.) Ziv On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at