Re: [UrJTAG-dev] urjtag on mingw

2020-02-12 Thread Geert Stappers
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 11:08:59PM +0300, Alexander Voropay wrote: > Geert, commit 2a8a4ef42b61e72510d3012474e69f76593a5eb3 > is incorrect. On a MINGW the __USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO should be > defined _before_ #include > New patch is in attachment. Applied > Two another patches for mingwfication

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] urjtag on mingw

2020-02-07 Thread Alexander Voropay
Geert, commit 2a8a4ef42b61e72510d3012474e69f76593a5eb3 is incorrect. On a MINGW the __USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO should be defined _before_ #include New patch is in attachment. Two another patches for mingwfication also included. As a result there are now only few C11 printf format warnings. See

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] urjtag on mingw

2020-01-16 Thread Geert Stappers
On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 09:38:14PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 10:56:26PM +0300, Alexander Voropay wrote: > > > 2) I'ts hard to set a Urjtag DATADIRECTORY on a Mingw. > > The method defined in the "UrJTAG.nsi" does not work anymore. > > Added a printf path "just for

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] urjtag on mingw

2020-01-07 Thread Geert Stappers
On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 10:56:26PM +0300, Alexander Voropay wrote: > 2) I'ts hard to set a Urjtag DATADIRECTORY on a Mingw. > The method defined in the "UrJTAG.nsi" does not work anymore. > Added a printf path "just for info" with "-h" option. That gets applied by me after thursday. Regards