At 1:35 PM -0700 10/9/2002, Jeff Morrison wrote:
I'm looking at both REALbasic and Revolution and I'm pretty sure I've
just discovered a huge problem with REALbasic, and I'm curious if
Revolution suffers from the same issue. Printing. RB printing seems
to be very, very, very tedious, requiring
At 1:16 AM -0700 10/10/2002, Scott Rossi wrote:
Recently, Jeanne A. E. DeVoto wrote:
I believe it would be in your best interest as the creators of the tools to
reference Rev/MC's ability to display *HTML source* and not the rendered
HTML pages that folks see in a Web browser.
Um... but it
At 9:06 AM -0700 10/10/2002, Dar Scott wrote:
[htmlText]
(I don't understand the motivation for the current whitespace handling. It
might be so get returns what you put, but I am missing the value of
that.)
The main initial motivation for adding the htmlText property, as I
understand it, was to
I am trying to figure out how to specify the languaage of a QT movie. QT
has two language specifications it seems, one is of the movie, and the
other is of the text track that accompanies it. In HC I could just say
set the language of movie X to French and it worked. But not so in RR.
Does anyone
At 07:19 PM 10/10/2002 -0700, Richard Gaskin wrote:
What are the advantages of putting a browser inside on your app's window?
What sort of apps are you folks making?
Hi Richard,
Specifically, I was thinking about building a news aggregator in RR, and a
true browser control would be very
For me, (and recall I'm not a professional developer), there is a
difference between apps that all look identical (which is what everything
done in VB tends to be) and apps which merely leverage a
previously-learned UI, consistent adherence to which is often touted as a
learning advantage.
Judy,
On Friday, October 11, 2002, at 12:43 AM, Jeanne A. E. DeVoto wrote:
The main initial motivation for adding the htmlText property, as I
understand it, was to provide a method of storing and transporting styled
text. So it's important that set the htmlText of field X to the htmlText
of field
When I highlight 3 objects, copy them, paste them, click off the highlight, then try
to move an obeject around again Revolution always quits on me. I am in OS X. ANy one
have any similar problems with stability?
-Tim
___
use-revolution
Sylvain,
You can do this:
set the name of last group to MyGroupName
Ken Ray
Sons of Thunder Software
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/
- Original Message -
From: Sylvain Le Gourriérec [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 11,
Kevin, et al:
Geoff Perlman posted this on the RB mailing list,
raising some good points which I thought I should reply to
I think Geoff missed the point entirely:
His issues are trivial compared to (and I'm speaking in general, not
just RB vs RR):
Can I translate the design concept in my
On Friday, October 11, 2002, at 04:23 PM, Timothy Hart wrote:
ANy one have any similar problems with stability?
Well, I'm happy to pass on the little bit of info I picked up from the
list 48 hours ago! Go to View - Look and Feel. Select Mac OS
Emulated. You have to do this every time you
At 9:26 PM -0400 10/10/02, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Jim Biancolo wrote:
I agree that an embedded rendering engine would be a killer feature.
I'v gotten so accustmed to using the browser as a helper app that I think
I'm missing something:
What are the advantages of putting a browser inside on
Jim Biancolo wrote:
I agree that an embedded rendering engine would be a killer feature.
Embedded or higly integrated ?
--snip--
Dan Shafer wrote :
I see lots of opportunity out there to create apps like this that
display rendered and interactive HTML in a pane with supplemental
controls
At 07:38 PM 10/11/2002 +0100, you wrote:
I agree that an embedded rendering engine would be a killer feature.
Embedded or higly integrated ?
--snip--
There's no reason why you can't currently use rev as your control panel
and a browser as your display mechanism with the users monitor as the
Hi Jan,
Thanks for reiterating all the bases you're covering. I thought it
might be something like that. It's amazing how difficult it is to
develop for the 'widest' user-base, isn't it? I did accomplish
something similar to what you are doing using the starter-kit before
though. To
This is a two-part question: First, does the speech external work on
Windows XP? I assumed it doesn't, because the site for MS Speech only
mentions up to W2K for the SAPI. But I don't have XP yet to try it.
(If it does, I would be very happy to hear that and sorry for the
wrong assumption,
--- mark mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jan,
Thanks for reiterating all the bases you're
covering. I thought it
might be something like that. It's amazing how
difficult it is to
develop for the 'widest' user-base, isn't it? I did
accomplish
something similar to what you are
And after the numeric fields, date fields and other
special-format fields (think X-999-XXX/999) are in
the works, and will be made available through the user
contributions in a Template Fields stack when I get it
all finished.
Best regards,
Jan Schenkel.
jan
I'm waiting for your template
Ray Bennett wrote:
Kurt - can you give us an idea of what sort of users you had? Were
they
random public folks or folks from a specific walk of life (such as
engineers, math teachers, lawyers, accountants)? Just curious because
we're in the middle of several UI considerations for a
hello,
how can I name a group dynamically
created?
e.g.
create button "myButton_1"
create button "myButton_2"
group button "myButton_1" and button
"myButton_2"
- how can I give it a name ?
thanks
Jim,
Clicking on a message in the subjects pane and having
it fire up an external browser would be too kludgey, IMO.
Personally, as long as it did what I wanted it to do, however complex, then
I wouldn't really mind if it involved a number of integrated seemless apps.
But maybe this is a
On 10/10/02 8:26 PM, curry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The question of RB vs. Rev is interesting and is getting more so, not
less. The main reason I'm still interested in RB is its potential for
3D. That's the only place where Rev doesn't offer anything.
The main difference for me is that I
On 10/11/02 11:01 AM, Rob Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For me, (and recall I'm not a professional developer), there is a
difference between apps that all look identical (which is what everything
done in VB tends to be) and apps which merely leverage a
previously-learned UI, consistent
here comes my actual license :
Name: eric jamesOrganization: Son Video DistributionKey:
1032-8867816-1324034-56178815865636135353432-25680Number of Licenses:
1
note that is the second license you sent
me.
first was :
Name: eric james Organisation: Son Video
Distribution No. of
At 09:36 PM 10/11/2002 +0100, Gary Rathbone wrote:
But maybe this is a Windows bias . . . I'm a bit more used to having my
apps self-contained. Those few times I've had the opportunity to work on
Macs I've found it disconcerting to have the menu floating off detached
from the working area of its
On Saturday, Oct 12, 2002, at 00:50 Australia/Sydney, Rob Cozens wrote:
For me, (and recall I'm not a professional developer), there is a
difference between apps that all look identical (which is what
everything
done in VB tends to be) and apps which merely leverage a
previously-learned UI,
At 09:36 PM 10/11/2002 +0100, Gary Rathbone wrote:
So that fact that the functional units are contained within a single
window/frame/pane gives the comforting perception/illusion of an
integration
application ?
I fear we're starting to stray off-topic for the list...
Fair point. But when many
At 4:41 PM -0400 10/11/02, Gary Rathbone wrote:
Dan Shafer wrote :
I see lots of opportunity out there to create apps like this that
display rendered and interactive HTML in a pane with supplemental
controls and an improved UI embodied in the desktop app. In fact, I
think this represents an
Dan,
There's no reason why you can't currently use rev as your control panel
and a browser as your display mechanism with the users monitor as the
pane.
I understand the use of multiple interacting applications. I just
don't think the solution is elegant. Rather it seems to me have
emerged from
Sarah - - - thanks so much for this script. I've hit one stumbling block that's keeping it from running, and no one seems to know how to fix it - - - was wondering if someone on this list might:
The problem is with this line:
if (class of configuration i of config) is (TCPIP v4 configuration)
Rob Cozens wrote:
How rich is the framework provided? The vendor can only supply so much
functionality. After that, you're going to want a rich set of third-party
plug-ins to choose from. Which environment provides this?
As a publisher of commercial software, I prefer to create my own
Rob,
What version of AppleScript/Mac OS are you using? It is possible that this
configuration didn't work properly in earlier versions...
The reason I say that is that since I was the original poster of the
AppleScript (to which Sarah added her valuable additions), and it worked for
me on an
At 11:07 PM 10/11/2002 +0100, Gary Rathbone wrote:
Thanks Jim, as you suggested we're straying off-topic, so I'll leave you to
have the last word (if you wish...)
Thanks for the interesting thread Gary (and other participants). Having
too much fun to quit now, so you can have the last word if
On 10/11/02 8:26 PM, Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- What's wrong with the language such that a completely separate API in
needed for plugins?
I Rev/MC we can trade groups and other native objects without needing to
treat them as second-class citizens.
Personally, I think this
What is the best way to implement a list of objects that are scrollable. I have a
need to scroll a list of groups that are made up of a text field grouped with a few
graphical elements.
Is there some way to attach an obect to a scrollable text field? Is there another
object designed for
Group the groups into one big group then open the properties palette then
check Vertical Scrollbar on the Group tab.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:use-revolution-admin;lists.runrev.com]On Behalf Of Mike Doub
Sent: Saturday, 12 October 2002 11:04 AM
To: [EMAIL
Lorin,
I haven't said much in this debate because usually it's a matter of
personal preference. Many people find VB very easy to use; others find it
foreign or difficult. Some find Rev easy, others find it not so easy. There
are so many factors involved (amount of programming background, tools
On Friday, October 11, 2002, at 07:25 PM, Troy Rollins wrote:
My point is, until RunRev makes it possible - it ain't possible.
Stacks with
some transcript embedded in them may be handy-dandy work savers, but
they're
not adding any real new capabilities. I wouldn't even call them plugins
Mike,
Use a group object and turn on its vertical scrolling property. You can
group the groups, and after you apply the scrollbar, it becomes a
scrolling region in and of itself.
Ken Ray
Sons of Thunder Software
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/
- Original
39 matches
Mail list logo
