On Jan 11, 2010, at 6:42 PM, Kevin Miller wrote:
Bill was often quirky, sometimes controversial, but usually he
was right.
This about matches my evaluation.
He'll be missed.
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
http://www.rpsystems.net
___
use-revolution
On Jan 9, 2010, at 1:05 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
The person you need is Colin -- the most incredible Lingo guru I
ever met, an accomplished x-talker, and a participant on this list.
Maybe he'll see this. :)
You didn't mention that he also knows the author of the book pretty
well.
--
On Jan 4, 2010, at 3:53 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
oic. I am wondering then how this is going to impact On-Rev, which
offers mySQL support?
On-rev also supports pgSQL out of the box.
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
http://www.rpsystems.net
___
On Jan 1, 2010, at 11:40 AM, Jerry Daniels wrote:
With our new handler tags feature, you can turn short comments
within your code into bookmarks within your handler list. We have a
short video showing how to make and use handler tags:
Brilliant. Jerry, this one kicks @ss.
--
Troy
On Dec 31, 2009, at 10:41 AM, Thomas McGrath III wrote:
I actually built around six versions of the image gallery and did
not like any of them. The final one at 4:30 this AM is almost what I
want. Anyway, a few things I am wishing for:
I think you'll be happier if you ditch RapidWeaver
On Dec 31, 2009, at 10:10 AM, Graham Samuel wrote:
I just picked this up from the Tidbits digest. It seems like a good
cause and I wonder if any lister here might be able to help.
Richard Gaskin has already offered (publicly) to host it on
RevJournal. Seems the offer was ignored.
--
On Dec 23, 2009, at 8:09 AM, Thomas McGrath III wrote:
WOW. I mean like WOW.
+1
Fabulous.
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
http://www.rpsystems.net
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to
On Dec 20, 2009, at 9:16 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
So I'm curious... does anyone use profiles, and if so, what for?
It's been three months without a reply, which is pretty much what I
figured.
Actually, I use them for platform specific interface adjustments.
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
On Dec 15, 2009, at 1:46 PM, Chris Sheffield wrote:
Can anyone help? Is there a way to do this? Or can someone recommend
another method of accomplishing the same thing?
Offset
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
http://www.rpsystems.net
___
use-revolution
On Dec 11, 2009, at 11:37 AM, Geoff Canyon Rev wrote:
Is it fair to say that the browser object is handled completely
differently than other objects?
That would be fair. Keep in mind that it is an external, and not a
native control.
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
http://www.rpsystems.net
On Dec 9, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Jim Ault wrote:
G5 PPC
OSX 10.5.8 leopard
FFox
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5)
Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 GTB6
Safari
Version 4.0.3 (5531.9)
Pretty much the same config.
Looks fine here, but I do see an apparent gamma
On Nov 30, 2009, at 1:08 PM, Lynn Fredricks wrote:
Id like to apologize to everyone who I have treated roughly and
without proper respect over the last several years.
Reciprocated. ;-)
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
http://www.rpsystems.net
___
On Nov 30, 2009, at 3:26 PM, Randall Reetz wrote:
Integrity. Transparency of intent.
This thread is done for me.
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
http://www.rpsystems.net
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this
On Nov 30, 2009, at 6:44 PM, Terry Judd wrote:
I like the look of this. I'm going to have to push an app out to a
variety
of hospital settings soon where QT is the exception rather than the
norm so
it may well do the job. Thanks (to all concerned) for the
recommendation.
Just pay
On Nov 30, 2009, at 7:39 PM, Troy Rollins wrote:
Just pay attention to the licensing.
Note that the license is by web site.
Here is a really good alternate which is by developer. (and it is
also much cheaper at that.)
http://www.shadowbox-js.com/
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
http
On Nov 29, 2009, at 6:23 PM, Randall Reetz wrote:
The slippery (or in this case invisible) slope of gorilla PR is
powerful especially and only because it sneeks so silently and
politely under our BS radar. So called multi-level marketing
proponents have known this forever. Sell to
On Nov 27, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Ralf Bitter wrote:
I am glad you like it, thanks a lot.
I think it would be awesome if revIgniter were just added as an
optional install to on-rev's control panel.
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
http://www.rpsystems.net
On Nov 27, 2009, at 10:47 PM, Martin Blackman wrote:
For dummy web guys like me, can this framework replace a content
management solution like Mambo, Drupal ?
It falls into the same general category, but you need to code pretty
much everything, as it doesn't have a back-end with a UI like
On Nov 26, 2009, at 2:56 PM, Ralf Bitter wrote:
I'm pleased to announce the alpha release of revIgniter.
revIgniter is a Web Application Development Framework
modeled on CodeIgniter, Ellislab, Inc. for people who build
web sites using revTalk.
Ralf, this looks really great.
Thanks for the
On Nov 23, 2009, at 3:03 PM, Jerry Daniels wrote:
We're about to do something pretty cool to tText and tRev. Something
Revolution developers will love.
I'm looking forward to this!
Since I already own both products, happy birthday Jerry.
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
http://www.rpsystems.net
On Nov 17, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Just a little honing of the terminology and layout in the store
would make it a bit easier for folks to give RunRev money.
+1
Don't make it so confusing to buy. People already have to take in the
somewhat unique cost structure of owning
On Nov 13, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Jerry Daniels wrote:
Today we are having a THREE PART Feature Friday today. We have just
posted part 1:
http://reveditor.com/feature-friday-part-1-better-tab-shortcuts
Love it!
Keep'm coming Jerry!
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
http://www.rpsystems.net
On Nov 13, 2009, at 7:23 PM, David Coker wrote:
Jerry, if you had any idea just how often I built small one off
apps just for the text processing I do in my work
Yep. Looks like a no-brainer for me as well.
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
http://www.rpsystems.net
On Nov 11, 2009, at 3:06 PM, Colin Holgate wrote:
I think I read about this issue in the past, but it seems that even
with the gm version of revMedia, the controller on a Player doesn't
work in a browser. It works in Rev. I've modified my test stack to
show the controller. You'll see that
On Nov 6, 2009, at 2:58 PM, Sivakatirswami wrote:
It practically means, once the GUI is locked down, you could pretty
much work on the back end of the project entirely from inside tRev!
Imagine if tRev had a message window. ;-)
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
http://www.rpsystems.net
On Oct 20, 2009, at 3:14 PM, David Bovill wrote:
At this stage - its just about saying you want in
I'd be interested.
I think what Rev really needs to fully take off is an open source CMS.
It seems that so many languages have really soared in popularity once
they had one going.
--
On Jul 29, 2009, at 9:37 AM, Jerry Daniels wrote:
For the time being, GLX2 is being maintained. Mark and I keep a
close eye on it. Are we adding tons of new features? No.
Thanks for the details Jerry.
So, let's say someone's GLX2 subscription had expired... should they
be looking at tRev
On Jul 28, 2009, at 6:53 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
I suppose I *should* point out that glx2 has a working trace in its
debugger...
Will GLX2 even be maintained now that tRev is the hot new thing?
Which, as I understand it, does not have a debugger, right?
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
On May 21, 2008, at 3:16 AM, Kay C Lan wrote:
Wish I'd been there :-(
To insult us personally?
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
http://www.rpsystems.net
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe,
On May 21, 2008, at 1:27 PM, Ken Ray wrote:
Kay's post had a couple of ;-) in it, so I took all as sarcastic
humor, not
insulting jab...
I guess that just goes to show that when your post is comprised
*solely* of an extended series of insulting remarks, even if you
sprinkle it with
On May 21, 2008, at 3:23 PM, Neal Campbell wrote:
I thought it was so funny I had to read it aloud to my wife who also
thought it was hilarious!
Yes, I know, and if I don't like it the unsubscribe link is right th
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
http://www.rpsystems.net
On May 19, 2008, at 3:48 AM, Henk van der Velden wrote:
1. So I can have a Flash file played through revBrowser in a Rev
application, and have that Flash file communicate with the very same
Rev application through a local socket connection?
Right.
2. A local socket, is that something
On May 19, 2008, at 4:53 PM, Dave Cragg wrote:
But if you also want to accept data from the Flash element, doesn't
the Flash script need to reset the connection prior to sending data
otherwise Rev doesn't know when to read from the socket. In the
example above, Rev closes the socket each
On May 14, 2008, at 11:37 AM, Jim Ault wrote:
Flash versions have different capabilities.
Early versions (MX MX2004) could read files, send and receive
packets from
servers, and listen for packets from servers (variable strings or XML
format) using GET or POST methods.
... and later
On May 1, 2008, at 11:33 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
I also post to Download.com
I can see that for cross platform apps, but I don't think they service
Mac apps, do they?
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
http://www.rpsystems.net
___
use-revolution
On Apr 28, 2008, at 11:11 AM, Bill Marriott wrote:
We send them out to just about everyone... suggest you write support
(at)
runrev.com to be sure you're on the list. They come out every two
weeks or
so and there's usually some good info each edition.
Since the newsletter itself is
On Apr 22, 2008, at 12:25 PM, Colin Holgate wrote:
It seems wrong to try and fix a math issue with a string hack.
Consider that everything is a string in Revolution, and then not so
much. ;-)
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
http://www.rpsystems.net
On Apr 22, 2008, at 1:45 PM, Colin Holgate wrote:
Correction then, it seems wrong to try and fix a math issue with a
hack of any sort.
I'll go along with that.
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
http://www.rpsystems.net
___
use-revolution mailing list
On Apr 16, 2008, at 4:49 PM, Mark Talluto wrote:
Ok. Here is the latest over here. Hans put USBOverdrive back into
the mix and got rev to crash within 4 saves using the rev ide. He
misses USBOverdrive and has gone back to using GLX2 to save all his
work. We have a working solution over
On Mar 31, 2008, at 9:38 AM, Trevor DeVore wrote:
Today I'm announcing the GLX Application Framework.
Trevor, very nicely done. I was just wondering last week why such a
thing doesn't yet exist for Revolution, and what it would take to
create a fully featured app framework... and now,
On Mar 16, 2008, at 12:18 PM, Colin Holgate wrote:
So, although Rev isn't anywhere near as fast as AS3 at handling text
strings, it is significantly faster than AS2, and a lot faster than
Director running under Rosetta. I realized I had a way to test it
not under Rosetta (can't tell you
On Mar 5, 2008, at 4:57 AM, Thierry wrote:
the scripts to be restored in the Glx2 Script Editor
Doesn't GLX2 basically have this functionality built in? Or or you
trying to do something different than what it does?
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
http://www.rpsystems.net
On Feb 28, 2008, at 9:54 AM, Dave wrote:
Statement should call ClientSocketOpen if the Server accepted the
connection or call socketError or socketTimeout if there was an
error? e.g. the Server closed the socket?
FWIW, I'm finding the whole state of sockets to be a bit of a
conundrum as
It seems that once I open a socket for connections, I've had problems
closing that socket without doing a resetAll, which I need to avoid.
Am I missing something simple? stop accepting connections or
something?
Ideally, I want only 1 connection made. so I was hoping to accept
until
On Feb 24, 2008, at 7:01 PM, Mark Schonewille wrote:
At the end of the script that handles an incoming connection, put:
close socket 8080
or whatever port number you are using.
Thanks Mark.
I think I had done something like that already, and then found that a
connection could still be
On Feb 24, 2008, at 7:23 PM, Mark Schonewille wrote:
Probably, you closed the socket that is created when the client
connects to your server, which is of the form
123.123.123.123:1234, while the socket you need to close to
disable any firther connections is just an integer, without the IP
On Feb 5, 2008, at 12:11 PM, Trevor DeVore wrote:
I imagine it is probably best to use a db with built in encryption
if you need encryption and searching.
Interestingly, both RealBasic (internally) and Director (via 3rd
party) have support for using encrypted SQLite databases - including
On Feb 4, 2008, at 11:30 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
That's a damn good-looking app, Troy.
Have you considered submitting it for Rev to add to their Case
Studies page?:
http://www.runrev.com/section/case_studies/
Fathom's clean, professional look reflects well on Rev.
Thanks. We worked
On Feb 2, 2008, at 2:41 PM, Jeff Reynolds wrote:
Hard drived based mpeg players dont have any control apis that you
can access to tell them what to play when. there is one option, the
adtec edge 4111, but its very expensive and a bit clunky on the
software side.
An somewhat older
On Jan 26, 2008, at 11:48 AM, Stephen Barncard wrote:
However, this list is conducted in English, and in English, it is an
insult to call someone an ignorant whatever. Period. End. You
can spend time with root words, definitions, etc. but here it's
perceived as an insult.
When I
On Jan 26, 2008, at 1:33 PM, Troy Rollins wrote:
However, this list is conducted in English, and in English, it is
an insult to call someone an ignorant whatever. Period. End.
You can spend time with root words, definitions, etc. but here
it's perceived as an insult.
When I first
On Jan 11, 2008, at 1:08 PM, Derek Bump wrote:
The reason I would like to lock the items in the dock is because a
customer of mine would REALLY benefit from it. He's an older man,
and with his arthritis, he has problems with clicking and
dragging. When he intends to click once (such as
On Jan 4, 2008, at 9:54 PM, Ken Ray wrote:
Well, I don't know what you mean - I downloaded and opened it on my
MacBook Pro (which is, of course, and Intel Mac) and was tooling
around
with it for a while before I saw your email... I don't know enough to
write anything that will compile, but
On Jan 3, 2008, at 2:29 AM, Ken Ray wrote:
The only thing I've run into is that it seems to work better if a PC
running Windows is the server and Macs are the clients; although I'm
running it right now with a MacBookPro as a server, an old iMac and a
Windows XP PC as clients, and the only
On Nov 18, 2007, at 9:43 PM, Ken Ray wrote:
This might help as well; it was an article I wrote trying to compare
Director's arrays with Revolution's, but it gives an inside peek on
how Revolution sees/works with arrays:
http://www.sonsothunder.com/devres/revolution/tips/arry001.htm
Ken, I
On Jul 14, 2006, at 1:23 AM, Judy Perry wrote:
And, again, it's not that I don't get x = 5 (or whatever). But pretty
soon we'll be looking at the most modern version of Lingo and it's
not pretty. Or learnable by normal humans.
The fact that Lingo is probably the most successful xtalk in
On Jul 14, 2006, at 11:23 AM, Rob Cozens wrote:
Has anyone supporting this on the basis of brevity stopped to
consider the irony that one can script the same functionality in
verbose Revolution in significantly fewer lines than it takes
using succinct C? So you want the productivity
On Jul 13, 2006, at 3:18 AM, Dan Shafer wrote:
The biggest problem with syntactic shortcuts as options is that
they bloat
the interpreter/compiler and result in slower execution. It's
inevitable. No
single change of this type is going to be noticeable, but you start
down
that slippery
On Jul 13, 2006, at 4:11 PM, Rob Cozens wrote:
The end of a revolution begins when leading revolutionists seek to
do things like the establishment does instead of better than the
establishment does.
This makes so much sense. So why are you doing it? ;-)
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
But this is a case where the syntax exist with Rev NOW, but not
within this context.
It is REALLY at odds with itself when...
local x = 5 // is legal, and perfectly normal
x = 5 // is not, and is an unthinkable construction
On Jul 12, 2006, at 5:25 AM, Robert Brenstein wrote:
Not
On Jul 12, 2006, at 11:04 AM, Rob Cozens wrote:
Understand that the ultimate result of such quests for brevity is C
syntax.
Not always. Lingo is still the best example of what I'm referring to.
It skips all the {} stuff. It behaves like an xtalk with more modern
and accepted syntax.
On Jul 12, 2006, at 10:27 AM, Rob Cozens wrote:
Is your TPC a convertible design [essentially a laptop where the
screen folds over backwards] or a slate design [no attached
keyboard]? If the former, you made the wrong hardware choice,
IMO. Why lug a keyboard everywhere when it isn't
On Jul 12, 2006, at 12:30 PM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:
So, if you (and you know who 'you' are) require all sorts of twiddly
add-ons that will make xTalk (er, Transcript, er Revolution) more like
your language of preference then why don't you lobby the makers of
your language of choice so it
On Jul 12, 2006, at 12:55 PM, Robert Sneidar wrote:
I can live with the syntax:
put Kudos for runrev into mThisIsCool. -- :-)
Me too. Obviously. I'm here, and have been since before Rev came on
the market. I'm sure I was one of the first professional (now
Enterprise) license holders.
On Jul 12, 2006, at 2:48 PM, Dan Shafer wrote:
And I think the discussion here
ought to be sufficient to convince you that your view -- which
you'd like to
prevail as well -- isn't accepted or agreed with by everyone,
either.
My point being that this is hardly the crowd to solicit
On Jul 12, 2006, at 8:41 PM, Björnke von Gierke wrote:
i have to strongly vote for: Leave it as is!
I do find it interesting how strongly people feel about things which
don't affect them. I'll be sure to react equally negatively the next
time I see an opinion expressed which doesn't
On Jul 12, 2006, at 10:09 PM, Chipp Walters wrote:
So if they
decide to add a Javascript layer, then so be it.
Agreed.
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
http://www.rpsystems.net
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit
On Jul 11, 2006, at 8:05 PM, Mark Smith wrote:
So in Revolution, 'x = 5' is an expression that evaluates to true
if the value held in variable x happens to be 5, and I'd imagine
that changing this might cause all sorts of trouble. Maybe it would
be practical to implement a pascal-type
On Jul 11, 2006, at 10:02 PM, Chipp Walters wrote:
The other issue is regarding maintenance and readability for OTHER
programmers. If there's this arcane 'other' way of doing something, it
may make it more difficult.
But this is a case where the syntax exist with Rev NOW, but not
within
On Jul 11, 2006, at 10:12 PM, Chipp Walters wrote:
You can create QTVR directly from Vue-I. I find Vue's product line
extremely easy to use and it performs well and has a nice upgrade
path. In fact, this week I'm the 'featured artist' at the Sci-Fi
Channels website where one of my Vue images
On Jul 11, 2006, at 9:49 PM, John Tregea wrote:
Our application will be used to front end a database that contains
classified information, the initial login account details would
have to be stored in the Rev application (inside custom properties
IIRC, a couple of years back I planned to
On Jul 11, 2006, at 10:50 PM, Dan Shafer wrote:
I guess
I'd grudgingly -- VERY darned grudgingly -- look the other way. But
I'd hold
my nose at the same time.
verbose = arcane
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
http://www.rpsystems.net
___
On Jul 11, 2006, at 11:43 PM, Chipp Walters wrote:
then you need to do at least as good
a job as the native platform you're running on (aka MODO).
No doubt! MODO is just gorgeous.
(Haven't sprung for that one yet, but I'm tempted by the interface
alone.)
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
On Jul 12, 2006, at 12:27 AM, Dar Scott wrote:
The best you can do is obfuscation. Don't put your key in one
place. Don't leave your key in your code in a form that looks like
a key from an editor. Don't use a script that can be seen by a
text editor. Even machine language is just
On Jul 12, 2006, at 12:46 AM, Dan Shafer wrote:
Completely disagree.
So... in other words, the language should suit specifically *you*
rather than *everyone*.
Director has 3 complete syntaxes. They are ALL in use. I've never
heard of anyone being bothered by the existence of the two
On Jul 10, 2006, at 12:59 PM, Rob Cozens wrote:
* TPC technology has been on the market for something like four to
six years, including a major software update in 2005. If and when
Apple competes in this market, they will be way behind.
Much like they were with music players.
I have a
On Jul 7, 2006, at 2:08 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
You know, I'd really advise against modifying the Rev IDE very
much. It is a inter-dependent web of scripts with millions of lines
of code, and changing any one thing can cause problems elsewhere --
at least until you've gone over all
On Jul 7, 2006, at 4:43 PM, Sarah Reichelt wrote:
Eric Chatonet wrote a plugin for doing this sort of thing which you
might find a good replacement.
It's near the bottom of this page:
http://www.sosmartsoftware.com/?r=revolutionl=en
Thanks for the advise. This looks like a really nice plugin
I'm curious... the timescale of player property seems to give me the
audio sample rate, and something unrelated to the currentTime property?
Most movies I've tested claim the timescale is 44100, where I would
have expected the standard QT 600.
What I'm really looking for is to generate
On Jun 30, 2006, at 11:02 AM, Jeffrey Reynolds wrote:
The Adtec Edje4111HD.
My software is specifically for controlling Adtec gear (but have
never tried with their HD stuff). I would imagine the API is the same
as it is for all the rest of their products.
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
On Jun 29, 2006, at 9:21 PM, Jeffrey Reynolds wrote:
I have a cool new HD mpeg server to play with here that was sposta
be serially controllable (what the clients wants) as the
manufacturer told me before we bought the sucker, but they
neglected to say that serial API will not be
On Jun 29, 2006, at 9:33 PM, Sarah Reichelt wrote:
Once connected, you can read from socket write to socket. If you
want some examples of sockets, you are welcome to have a look at my
POP SMTP libraries. They use different ports and different command
sets, but the basic techniques should be
On Apr 16, 2006, at 11:25 AM, Jerry Daniels wrote:
We've laid out a product road map (http://daniels-mara.com/
galaxy_blog/?page_id=3) so you can see where we're headed and offer
feedback. We've, of course, shared our thoughts with Kevin and he
expressed enthusiasm for our direction and
On Apr 13, 2006, at 11:11 AM, Graham Samuel wrote:
I want to distribute a structurally simple RR-developed application
to Mac OSX users (it's the standalone itself and a couple of sample
folders). In testing, all I've done is to copy the app (which we
all know is really a folder) to
On Apr 13, 2006, at 2:28 PM, Peter T. Evensen wrote:
More naive users, however, may not have my initial distrust of the
technology LOL.
Yeah. I'm sure thats it.
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
http://www.rpsystems.net
___
use-revolution mailing list
On Apr 11, 2006, at 3:30 PM, Mark Talluto wrote:
Mark Talluto_ 144 ||
Marielle,
Wow! I did not realize I even posted this many messages. While
this is a low number, I thought I was more quite than that. How
did you derive this information?
I hit the
On Apr 10, 2006, at 8:42 PM, Jim MacConnell wrote:
What are ...effects ling interactive blending? s/b like me
thinks. Or is Safari doing a weird word replacement?
'leet speak for including, I guess.
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
http://www.rpsystems.net
I have an older application which relies on getting returns to
Applescript via telling Revolution to do script, this app used to
work fine in 2.6.1 and earlier, but fails silently in 2.7.x
My Applescript tool (Late Night Software's Script Debugger X)
claims that Revolution is not
On Mar 28, 2006, at 1:15 PM, Troy Rollins wrote:
I have an older application which relies on getting returns to
Applescript via telling Revolution to do script, this app used to
work fine in 2.6.1 and earlier, but fails silently in 2.7.x
My Applescript tool (Late Night Software's Script
On Apr 1, 2006, at 11:25 AM, Ruslan Zasukhin wrote:
Actually Revolution should have Active Listbox if it still do not
have it.
Any threading will not help you if you want to browser 10 millions
table.
Active Listbox is an answer.
Agreed.
Then again, *any* multi-column listbox which is
On Mar 29, 2006, at 1:20 AM, Ken Ray wrote:
Actually, it's not lost, Troy!
Well, it WAS lost. Now I guess it is found again. I think it would be
good if RR would go ahead and tie it in properly, and make it support
exporting into our apps. This is a really good feature, and I'm glad
it
On Mar 29, 2006, at 10:31 AM, Troy Rollins wrote:
This is a really good feature, and I'm glad it is salvageable (to
say the least.)
And the good news, I already received the following:
http://support.runrev.com/bugdatabase/show_bug.cgi?id=3467
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What
On Mar 29, 2006, at 7:45 PM, Ken Ray wrote:
Yes. Email me privately and I'll send you a copy to use until
RunRev puts
out the next build...
Just to confirm, Ken's simple fix takes care of it, and Rev is
happily Applescript compatible again. I'm glad RunRev has confirmed
it and will fix
On Mar 28, 2006, at 6:53 AM, Sivakatirswami wrote:
We are pleased to announce, thanks to everyone's hard work, Andre
Garzia's talents and the support of many on this list, the Hinduism
Today Digital Edition -- Release Candidate 1.0rc.1 which just
means, all known bugs discovered to date
I have an older application which relies on getting returns to
Applescript via telling Revolution to do script, this app used to
work fine in 2.6.1 and earlier, but fails silently in 2.7.x
My Applescript tool (Late Night Software's Script Debugger X)
claims that Revolution is not
On Mar 28, 2006, at 4:16 PM, Klaus Major wrote:
My Applescript tool (Late Night Software's Script Debugger X)
claims that Revolution is not scriptable, where it used to show
support for do script... any ideas?
I have asked this a couple of times on this list some time ago, but
nobody
On Mar 28, 2006, at 8:12 PM, Jim Ault wrote:
To be clear, Rev 2.2.1 allowed the do script to be sent from another
program to Rev and trigger a handler. I used this form.
Thanks Jim. This is exactly the issue that I'm talking about. Kind of
disappointing to have to rebuild all of my AS/Rev
On Mar 28, 2006, at 8:12 PM, Jim Ault wrote:
EXPERIMENT
Jim, my previously working AS/Rev combination involved Rev setting
the values of Applescript variables via do script, I'm not sure I
see how AppleEvents resolves this. Have you done this by any chance?
How are any values returned
On Mar 28, 2006, at 9:11 PM, Jim Ault wrote:
I have not used the return of a value to the calling AppleScript
program. I
do use the following:
do codeString as Applescript
Yes, my same application does this as well. In fact, in this program,
Rev can be one of the applications which
On Mar 28, 2006, at 9:23 PM, Troy Rollins wrote:
Yes, my same application does this as well. In fact, in this
program, Rev can be one of the applications which launches the
AppleScript, which then in turn asks Rev to populate various
variables it may require. Now, I'll probably have
1 - 100 of 715 matches
Mail list logo
