RE: 2.7 Consensus

2006-02-20 Thread Scott Kane
Hi all, Thanks for your feedback. I've decided to complet my current project in the previous release and a another new project in 5.7 Cheers Scott ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe,

Re: 2.7 Consensus

2006-02-19 Thread Sarah Reichelt
On 2/19/06, Scott Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, There has been a lot of chatter here (in a good way) about the release of 2.7. I'm eligible for the upgrade and have downloaded it and so far have had zero problems in the tasks I have needed to perform. However - I'm leery on

Re: 2.7 Consensus

2006-02-19 Thread Martin Baxter
Scott Kane wrote: Hi all, There has been a lot of chatter here (in a good way) about the release of 2.7. I'm eligible for the upgrade and have downloaded it and so far have had zero problems in the tasks I have needed to perform. However - I'm leery on working on a project for real given some

Re: 2.7 Consensus

2006-02-19 Thread Mark Wieder
Scott- Saturday, February 18, 2006, 9:05:32 PM, you wrote: As one of the folks who has gone back to 2.6.1, I'd say there's no problem with using 2.7. The things that bother me about the new release revolve around the inability to use the documentation in any reasonable fashion, the fact that IDE

Re: 2.7 Consensus

2006-02-19 Thread James Spencer
On Feb 19, 2006, at 11:13 AM, Mark Wieder wrote: Scott- Saturday, February 18, 2006, 9:05:32 PM, you wrote: As one of the folks who has gone back to 2.6.1, I'd say there's no problem with using 2.7. The things that bother me about the new release revolve around the inability to use the

Re: 2.7 Consensus

2006-02-19 Thread Stephen Barncard
My take on 2.7 - Awesome. In spite of the heavily discussed issues, I find 2.7 much more stable and robust than ever. It seems to load more quickly, and all the IDE problems I had before went away... (YMMV). The antialiasing and blending features are very cool too..I am going stay with 2.7

Re: 2.7 Consensus

2006-02-19 Thread Mark Wieder
James- Sunday, February 19, 2006, 9:22:28 AM, you wrote: Just for a slightly dissenting opinion, I LIKE the new documentation and consider it a VAST improvement, both in terms of searching the dictionary for explicit terms (what I mostly need it for so I can see the syntax) and for the

2.7 Consensus

2006-02-18 Thread Scott Kane
Hi all, There has been a lot of chatter here (in a good way) about the release of 2.7. I'm eligible for the upgrade and have downloaded it and so far have had zero problems in the tasks I have needed to perform. However - I'm leery on working on a project for real given some of the issues being