Dennis-
Thursday, June 9, 2005, 7:39:52 PM, you wrote:
DB It simulates the stock markets (every stock) for the past ten years,
Now *there's* a depressing idea...
on SimulateStockMarketForLastTenYears
create graphic tanked
set the style of it to line
set the points of it to 0,0,200,200
Now why didn't I think of that. It's so simple!
Leave it to Rev to be able to script a complex problem in a simple way.
However, I think the points should be two lines bubble and tanked
--and we haven't got to the end of the tanked line yet.
Dennis
On Jun 10, 2005, at 12:18 PM, Mark Wieder
Hi Dennis,
Nonworking script in field PN1:
on mouseUp
call SaveMeTxt
end mouseUp
Did you try call SaveMeText ?
Per Transcript Dictionary (call command), The entire handler including
parameters must be enclosed in quotes.
Rob Cozens CCW
Serendipity Software Company
And I,
Rob,
Yes I did. Both seem to work if you don't have parameters. But as I
posted, the call is not required to get the proper functionality.
Dennis
On Jun 9, 2005, at 9:07 AM, Rob Cozens wrote:
Hi Dennis,
Nonworking script in field PN1:
on mouseUp
call SaveMeTxt
end mouseUp
Did
Dennis Brown wrote:
Richard,
Going through your tutorial is what made me try to improve my scripts
with call. I thought that the call would execute a script in another
place but keep the context of where it was called from. So 'me' would
be the field that the call originated from and
On Jun 9, 2005, at 9:23 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Using the long id of the target will provide an absolute
reference to the specific object, but I'm not sure why simply the
target doesn't return the same value. Hmmm makes the
target rather less useful, unless there's a benefit to
On 6/9/05 6:23 PM, Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using the long id of the target will provide an absolute reference to
the specific object, but I'm not sure why simply the target doesn't
return the same value. Hmmm makes the target rather less useful,
unless there's a benefit
Dick Kriesel wrote:
On 6/9/05 6:23 PM, Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using the long id of the target will provide an absolute reference to
the specific object, but I'm not sure why simply the target doesn't
return the same value. Hmmm makes the target rather less useful,
On Jun 9, 2005, at 9:51 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
What are the relative timings of handlers in the message path vs.
handlers
outside?
About twice as long, but as with many benchmarks with Transcript it
hardly matters: twice as long sounds like a big deal, but on my
1GHz G4 that's still
On 6/9/05 6:23 PM, Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But to be honest, it's very rare that I use either call or send.
Both are up there with do in terms of a modest amount of additional
overhead needed to handle them relative to calls natively in the message
path.
On 6/9/05 8:51 PM,
Dar Scott wrote:
On Jun 9, 2005, at 9:51 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
What are the relative timings of handlers in the message path vs.
handlers
outside?
About twice as long, but as with many benchmarks with Transcript it
hardly matters: twice as long sounds like a big deal, but on my
Dick Kriesel wrote:
On 6/9/05 6:23 PM, Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But to be honest, it's very rare that I use either call or send.
Both are up there with do in terms of a modest amount of additional
overhead needed to handle them relative to calls natively in the message
path.
I have two versions of a script. The first uses an implicit send and
works. The second uses a call and does not work. I was trying to
simplify and expand my scripting abilities with call, but I must be
missing something, because I can't see what is wrong with it. I
appreciate any
appreciate any insights.
The stack for this coming Saturday's online conference has a demo in it
called Call vs Send, with a discussion of the differences between the two:
http://support.runrev.com/scriptingconferences/
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Media Corporation
On Jun 8, 2005, at 1:54 PM, Dennis Brown wrote:
I have two versions of a script. The first uses an implicit send and
works. The second uses a call and does not work. I was trying to
simplify and expand my scripting abilities with call, but I must be
missing something, because I can't see
On Jun 8, 2005, at 5:33 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
(There is also an unsupported way.)
dar
Dar,
now, I am curious...
Andre
--
Andre Alves Garzia 2004
Soap Dog Studios - BRAZIL
http://studio.soapdog.org
___
use-revolution mailing list
Call vs Send, with a discussion of the differences
between the two:
http://support.runrev.com/scriptingconferences/
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Media Corporation
__
Rev tools and more: http://www.fourthworld.com/rev
Dar,
Yes, you see my problem exactly. It is the target that returns the
name of my field, but the group name is left off which is bad for me
because I have the same name repeated in many differently named
groups. I have groups of fields and buttons that are created from
templates on the
On Jun 8, 2005, at 2:48 PM, Andre Garzia wrote:
(There is also an unsupported way.)
now, I am curious...
the executionContexts
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Dennis --
You can find the name of the group that contains the target in the long
name of the target.
-- Dick
On 6/8/05 2:03 PM, Dennis Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dar,
Yes, you see my problem exactly. It is the target that returns the
name of my field, but the group name is left off
On Jun 8, 2005, at 3:03 PM, Dennis Brown wrote:
Yes, you see my problem exactly. It is the target that returns the
name of my field, but the group name is left off which is bad for me
because I have the same name repeated in many differently named
groups. I have groups of fields and buttons
On Jun 8, 2005, at 3:16 PM, Dick Kriesel wrote:
You can find the name of the group that contains the target in the
long
name of the target.
That only gets you the name of a group that contains something with the
same name as the target. Unlike 'me', 'the target' does not uniquely
Dar,
Yes, you see my problem exactly. It is the target that returns the
name of my field, but the group name is left off which is bad for me
because I have the same name repeated in many differently named
groups. I have groups of fields and buttons that are created from
templates on the
On Jun 8, 2005, at 3:16 PM, Dick Kriesel wrote:
You can find the name of the group that contains the target in the long
name of the target.
That only gets you the name of a group that contains something with
the same name as the target. Unlike 'me', 'the target' does not
uniquely identify
On Jun 8, 2005, at 5:13 PM, Robert Brenstein wrote:
Similarly
get the id of the target
returns the proper, and unique, id of the button clicked. So while the
target itself returns incomplete description to uniquely identify an
object, it can still be used to get unique identification as
Thanks Robert,Dick,Dar,Richard,, --empty item at end of list in case
I forgot anyone ;-)
That is the answer I need. In my button or field script I can just put:
on mouseUp --this was actually called by another button and not
actually clicked on by me
DoMyFieldScript --couldn't be
26 matches
Mail list logo
