Re: DOWNLOADING REV 4.0.0

2010-11-19 Thread Björnke von Gierke
on startup put the effective filename of me into thePath put the files into theList filter theList with *.rev put line 1 of theList into theStack put the short name of me into theStandalone hide this stack go stack theStack if the result then show stack theStack put

Re: DOWNLOADING REV 4.0.0

2010-11-19 Thread Bob Sneidar
Eheh. Of course. DOH! Bob On Nov 19, 2010, at 4:56 AM, Björnke von Gierke wrote: on startup put the effective filename of me into thePath put the files into theList filter theList with *.rev put line 1 of theList into theStack put the short name of me into theStandalone hide this

Re: DOWNLOADING REV 4.0.0

2010-11-18 Thread Bob Sneidar
Just thot I'd say, the player was one of the selling points for me. To be able to distribute a stack I made for the company I work for, along with a player, without having to futz with all the idiosyncrasies of standalones was very appealing. I was disappointed when support for the player went

Re: DOWNLOADING REV 4.0.0

2010-11-17 Thread Joseba Aguayo
Kaixo: How it's possible that RunRev delete the Revolution Player from his Web?? Update the software, but don't delete old files that your client use! This is a serious company? Un saludo. Joseba Aguayo Fernández (jagu...@telur.es)

Re: DOWNLOADING REV 4.0.0

2010-11-17 Thread Richmond
On 11/17/2010 11:23 AM, Joseba Aguayo wrote: Kaixo: How it's possible that RunRev delete the Revolution Player from his Web?? Update the software, but don't delete old files that your client use! This is a serious company? Un saludo. Joseba Aguayo Fernández (jagu...@telur.es)

Re: DOWNLOADING REV 4.0.0

2010-11-17 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 11/17/10 3:23 AM, Joseba Aguayo wrote: Kaixo: How it's possible that RunRev delete the Revolution Player from his Web?? Update the software, but don't delete old files that your client use! This is a serious company? They are not deleted, but are no longer supported so they

Re: DOWNLOADING REV 4.0.0

2010-11-16 Thread Richmond
On 11/16/2010 12:44 PM, Joseba Aguayo wrote: Hello: Beware with RunRev This is the incredible answer of the RunRev service support : Dear Joseba Aguayo, Thank you for your request. If you are referring to the old DreamCard Revolution Player, it is no longer

Re: DOWNLOADING REV 4.0.0

2010-11-16 Thread Matthias Rebbe
Hi Joseba, you could use Ken Ray´s stackrunner instead http://www.sonsothunder.com/devres/revolution/downloads/StackRunner.htm Regards, Matthia Am 15.11.2010 um 09:23 schrieb Joseba Aguayo: Hello: I have a similar problem. I send an email to supp...@runrev.com, with the question Where

Re: DOWNLOADING REV 4.0.0

2010-11-16 Thread Richmond
On 11/16/2010 01:28 PM, Matthias Rebbe wrote: Hi Joseba, you could use Ken Ray´s stackrunner instead http://www.sonsothunder.com/devres/revolution/downloads/StackRunner.htm Regards, Matthia Thanks: I have just downloaded all the versions of StackRunner (2.0 and 1.3) to add to my special

Re: DOWNLOADING REV 4.0.0

2010-11-16 Thread Joseba Aguayo
Thanks Matthias. Are you in the RunRev support team? Perhaps NO, but you solve the problem. (The RunRev support team create problems) Eskerrik asko Matthias. Un saludo. Joseba Aguayo Fernández (jagu...@telur.es) On Nov 16, 2010, at 6:01 PM, use-revolution-requ...@lists.runrev.com wrote: Hi

Re: DOWNLOADING REV 4.0.0

2010-11-16 Thread Peter Haworth
I love how unconnected discussions come together! I just downloaded stackrunner and it seems to solve all my issues regarding standalone startup banners/using test files versus live files. I point it to my application .rev file and it runs it as if it were a standalone, opening the live

Re: DOWNLOADING REV 4.0.0

2010-11-16 Thread Richmond
On 11/16/2010 08:04 PM, Peter Haworth wrote: I love how unconnected discussions come together! I just downloaded stackrunner and it seems to solve all my issues regarding standalone startup banners/using test files versus live files. I point it to my application .rev file and it runs it as

Re: DOWNLOADING REV 4.0.0

2010-11-16 Thread Peter Haworth
On Nov 16, 2010, at 11:05 AM, Richmond wrote: On 11/16/2010 08:04 PM, Peter Haworth wrote: I love how unconnected discussions come together! I just downloaded stackrunner and it seems to solve all my issues regarding standalone startup banners/using test files versus live files. I

Re: DOWNLOADING REV 4.0.0

2010-11-16 Thread Richmond
On 11/16/2010 09:34 PM, Peter Haworth wrote: On Nov 16, 2010, at 11:05 AM, Richmond wrote: On 11/16/2010 08:04 PM, Peter Haworth wrote: I love how unconnected discussions come together! I just downloaded stackrunner and it seems to solve all my issues regarding standalone startup

Re: DOWNLOADING REV 4.0.0

2010-11-16 Thread Bob Sneidar
I never read that scripture. Must be Apocrypha. On Nov 16, 2010, at 11:57 AM, Richmond wrote: That reminds me of one of my favourite bits in the Bible; where Jezebel does her boyfriend with a tent peg. ___ use-revolution mailing list

Re: DOWNLOADING REV 4.0.0

2010-11-16 Thread Richmond
On 11/16/2010 10:55 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote: I never read that scripture. Must be Apocrypha. On Nov 16, 2010, at 11:57 AM, Richmond wrote: That reminds me of one of my favourite bits in the Bible; where Jezebel does her boyfriend with a tent peg. I am sorry; it was Jael who drove a tent peg

Re: DOWNLOADING REV 4.0.0

2010-11-16 Thread Ken Ray
Frankly, distributing a stack with a stackrunner as a commercial package doesn't look that good; especially as anybody who can get their paws (sweaty or otherwise) on a copy of RR/LC can merrily start mucking around with your stack. Agree with that. That's one of the reasons I've never

Re: DOWNLOADING REV 4.0.0

2010-11-12 Thread Joe Lewis Wilkins
Well, I've downloaded LC 4.5.1 and it builds the application. I've only checked the Mac version at this time, but there are definitely some things that don't work in the standalone as they do in the IDE mode. Cause for a lot of head scratching. Incidentally, for those who have less than perfect

Re: DOWNLOADING REV 4.0.0

2010-11-12 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 11/12/10 1:22 PM, Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote: I'dstill like to know why the build with 4.0 hasn't worked. The errors you got indicated that some of the files required for the build weren't in their default locations, so the standalone builder couldn't find them. The most likely reason is