Rev 2.5 Beta [Performance/Rev-Online/Dreamcard/...]

2004-07-22 Thread Malte Brill
Hi all, first of all I would like to say thanks for this Beta. I see the Rev-Team has put lots of effort into it. :-) 1.) Performance. I am glad to see that my ErcSneak stack now runs as fast under X as it does under 9. It slows down a bit with 2.1/2.2 This is Great! 2.) Rev-online. I think

Re: Rev 2.5 Beta [Performance/Rev-Online/Dreamcard/...]

2004-07-22 Thread Kevin Miller
On 22/7/04 1:31 pm, Malte Brill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2.) Rev-online. I think this could become a cool place if it gets used. What I really would love to see is how big in KB/MB the stacks are (I just looked at it, so maybe this is somewhere I havent found yet) I created an account a few

Re: Rev 2.5 Beta [Performance/Rev-Online/Dreamcard/...]

2004-07-22 Thread Mark Brownell
on 7/22/04 5:31 AM, Malte Brill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it could be useful if the player would allow Autoplay for CD Roms. This could be implemented by looking for a simple text file e.g. toc.txt with only one line of text holding the relative path to the stack that should be

Re: Rev 2.5 Beta [Performance/Rev-Online/Dreamcard/...]

2004-07-22 Thread Judy Perry
Ummm, maybe it's because I'm a really crappy scripter, but my intro to Rev/mouse events project I think ended up being 6 MB.. I guess I would have to go back and check to see how much space is due to my assuming (probably correctly) that the low-end PCs wouldn't do TTS, so I recorded my Mac doing

Re: Rev 2.5 Beta [Performance/Rev-Online/Dreamcard/...]

2004-07-22 Thread Judy Perry
I agree: I also had to pause my mouse over the new tools palette, but I think it was because I was doing the Rosetta Stone thing in my brain. The new GUI does look modern, which has to help it in the credibility market. Also, am I mistaken, or did the new tools palette do away with my observed