Re: Why did HyperCard wither away? [was: Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?']

2005-12-12 Thread Rob Cozens
Stephen, Jean-Louis Gasse as with the original HC, Apple management didn't get it...with one exception: the person who preceeded Jobs' second coming. It's been too long for me to remember his name Gil Amillio (?; sp?) I'm pretty sure it wasn't Gasse. Did Amillio (sp?) preceed Job's

Rev Evangelist? (was Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?)

2005-12-12 Thread Todd Higgins
What has happened to Ro Nagey? I thought he was the Rev evangelist? Todd -- Todd Higgins [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Dec 10, 2005, at 3:56 PM, Dan Shafer wrote: I hope you guys keep carrying this forward. This is very exciting and exactly the kind of thing that a Rev evangelist, if such a person

Re: Rev Evangelist? (was Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?)

2005-12-12 Thread Björnke von Gierke
On Dec 12 2005, at 19:43, Todd Higgins wrote: What has happened to Ro Nagey? I thought he was the Rev evangelist? ... Not anymore. unfortunately that's all i know about it -- official ChatRev page: http://chatrev.bjoernke.com Chat with other RunRev developers: go stack URL

Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'

2005-12-11 Thread Marielle Lange
Hi Chipp, Thanks for the reply. Again, sorry if what I wrote was perceived as an attack. Sorry folks, this was not meant to be about you. This was meant to be about the other end of the spectrum BIG grin. What you find on runrev ltd frontpage is: Revolution Dreamcard is ideal for

Re: What Rev Needs -- Again (was Why is Konfabulator Pretty?)

2005-12-11 Thread Wolfgang Bereuter
On 08.12.2005, at 18:18, Richard Gaskin wrote: Okay, I'll bite: what exactly is an open source strategy for an engine which is, and will likely remain, closed-source? Richard, I know you since many years as a very intelligent person. I cant explain why its so difficut to understand why

Re: What Rev Needs -- Again (was Why is Konfabulator Pretty?)

2005-12-11 Thread Richard Gaskin
Wolfgang, I've replied to your message on the rev-biz list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rev-biz/ -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Media Corporation ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com

Re: Why did HyperCard wither away? [was: Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?']

2005-12-11 Thread Rob Cozens
Jack, Bill, et al: Can anybody pick it up when hypercard went back to apple and we were supposed to have version 3.0? [snip] I guess I assumed the leadership at Apple controlled the robustness and goals of the teams involved in product development, even at Claris. The HyperCard team

Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'

2005-12-11 Thread Richard Gaskin
I've replied to this on the rev-biz list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rev-biz/ -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Media Corporation ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com ___

Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'

2005-12-11 Thread capellan (sent by Nabble.com)
Marielle Lange wrote: Dreamcard is presented as something that persons with lack of experience with other development environments can come to grip with. Apparently, it doesn't work that well. Beginners often complain on this list or elswhere (see , a mailing list for dreamcard users

Re: Why did HyperCard wither away? [was: Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?']

2005-12-11 Thread Rob Cozens
as with the original HC, Apple management didn't get it...with one exception: the person who preceeded Jobs' second coming. It's been too long for me to remember his name Gil Amillio (?; sp?) Rob Cozens, CCW Serendipity Software Company Vive R Revolution!

Re: Why did HyperCard wither away? [was: Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?']

2005-12-11 Thread Stephen Barncard
Jean-Louis Gasse as with the original HC, Apple management didn't get it...with one exception: the person who preceeded Jobs' second coming. It's been too long for me to remember his name Gil Amillio (?; sp?) Rob Cozens, CCW Serendipity Software Company Vive R Revolution! -- stephen

RE: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'

2005-12-11 Thread Scott Kane
@lists.runrev.com Subject: Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?' Marielle Lange wrote: Dreamcard is presented as something that persons with lack of experience with other development environments can come to grip with. Apparently, it doesn't work that well. Beginners often complain on this list

Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'

2005-12-10 Thread Marielle Lange
of persons, you reduce the cost each person needs to pay. That's the case for license fees. That's the case for the amount of time/work each person has to give for a useful collection of resources to be rapidly set up. And that was the all point of this thread on why is konfabulator pretty

Re: Why did HyperCard wither away? [was: Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?']

2005-12-10 Thread simplsol
] To: use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Sent: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 21:13:05 -0500 Subject: Why did HyperCard wither away? [was: Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'] Well, I had the good fortune to be at Claris during the HyperCard transition. I knew the development team and the product managers well. I don't

Re: Why did HyperCard wither away? [was: Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?']

2005-12-10 Thread Bill
Thanks for that clear discourse. I think the true story behind the demise of Hypercard is very interesting. I'd like to see it fleshed-out a little more to a full story especially with some of the interesting facts such as the fast indexing code story and other history. In fact such a story (the

Re: Why did HyperCard wither away? [was: Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?']

2005-12-10 Thread Mark Swindell
Bill, Thank you for the fresh insider perspective! Perhaps I can finally put to rest my conspiracy theories. (I hate it when that happens.) I guess I assumed the leadership at Apple controlled the robustness and goals of the teams involved in product development, even at Claris.

Why did HyperCard wither away? [was: Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?']

2005-12-10 Thread Mathewson
This reminds me of Srila Bhagavan Goswami Gurudeva - Woops, letting too much out about my murky past - strike that. When a 'church'/movement/revolution goes rotten it is normally because its founder members have become disillusioned and left because they feel that the original vision has been

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-10 Thread Dan Shafer
I hope you guys keep carrying this forward. This is very exciting and exactly the kind of thing that a Rev evangelist, if such a person existed, would salivate over being able to show. ~~ Dan Shafer, Information Product Consultant and Author

Re: Why did HyperCard wither away? [was: Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?']

2005-12-10 Thread revinfo1155
:35:59 -0800 Subject: Re: Why did HyperCard wither away? [was: Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'] Bill,    Thank you for the fresh insider perspective! Perhaps I can finally put to rest my conspiracy theories. (I hate it when that happens.)   e  I guess I assumed the leadership at Apple

Re: Why did HyperCard wither away? [was: Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?']

2005-12-10 Thread Dan Shafer
FWIW, I think Bill is neither cheesed off nor outcast. He always had a passion for photography (and he's damned good at it) and he wrangled with technology long enough to have enough success to pay for his habit. I haven't talked to him for quite a while, but I'd be surprised if he's involved in

Re: Why did HyperCard wither away? [was: Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?']

2005-12-10 Thread Dan Shafer
Bill. Wow. Thanks for that wonderful stroll down memory lane. I remember being shown a prototype of a Windows version of HC at Claris at some point. I wonder if you were one of the folks in the room. i think Danny G and I were in the same NDA briefing. BTW, the HC evangelist at Apple,

Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'

2005-12-10 Thread Richard Gaskin
Marielle Lange wrote: It's not a question of being able to fork $5000 for a product because some clients can pay for it. Fortunately RunRev asks about 1/8th that amount for their most expensive license. It's a question that revolution puts as selling line on its website: Revolution

Re: Why did HyperCard wither away? [was: Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?']

2005-12-10 Thread Mark Wieder
Dan- Saturday, December 10, 2005, 1:35:26 PM, you wrote: BTW, the HC evangelist at Apple, pre-Claris (I think his name was Bob Fernandez; he was a former criminal defense attorney and a hell of a scripter) had the idea of embedding HC and a TCP stack in the Mac ROM really early. He was

Re: Why did HyperCard wither away? [was: Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?']

2005-12-10 Thread Dan Shafer
Nope, it was Bob Perez. I just looked it up. On 12/10/05, Mark Wieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dan- Saturday, December 10, 2005, 1:35:26 PM, you wrote: BTW, the HC evangelist at Apple, pre-Claris (I think his name was Bob Fernandez; he was a former criminal defense attorney and a hell

Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'

2005-12-09 Thread Chipp Walters
MisterX wrote: Just my 2 cents after lots of aggravation trying to get this far with skins and porting graphical applications from W2K to XP to OSX... It's definitely not as simple or smooth as Chipp says IMOHO - no offence Chipp... X, No offense taken. For those who are HIG sticklers, you

Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'

2005-12-09 Thread xavier . bury
Chipp, It's not the differences in GUIs and HIGs that the problem. It's the problem of having two different sets of skins on XP (w2k and xp buttons) or in the case of skinned buttons, where on OSX these just do not port... After that, the next big problem facing rev developpers is HTML

Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'

2005-12-09 Thread Heather Nagey
Dear Judy, Marielle, Xavier and others, Mountains move slowly. Especially when we only have a limited number of people available to lift them. I wish we had more Kevin's, but we only have the one, which we use as efficiently as we possibly can. I frequently read on this list and others he

How revolution can be used to make pretty widgets (was Why is Konfabulator Pretty?)

2005-12-09 Thread Marielle Lange
Hi Tom, Tom wrote: Bill spurred me on with his wish that REV had a more hip UI. I thought that a template with some buttonGadget style simplicity and some guidelines for coding in Rev would pave the way for a series of simple apps (widgets, dashboards, etc.) I have two projects in the

Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'

2005-12-09 Thread Marielle Lange
Hi Heather, I always enjoy reading you on this list. Over Time. We cannot, much though we would like to, do everything for everybody, all at once. As you are probably aware, we all try on this list to minimize the amount of criticisms and to channel them when they occur. In reaction

Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'

2005-12-09 Thread Stephen Barncard
X, don't patterns have to have boundaries to repeat? And generally they should relate to binary boundaries, 64x64, 128x128, 16x16, etc. Why would the Mac platform be the problem? I've never seen any 'standard' 20x20 pattern. sqb later and when i realized my mistake it was too late - damage

Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'

2005-12-09 Thread Stephen Barncard
Are you sure about this? I thought Quartz ruled now...the 'old toolbox' is long dead. With all due respect, X, your mac knowledge seems to end around 1995. sqb CThis is the big show stopper in my point of view towards smooth transitions across platforms. The reason? Dependencies on the old

Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'

2005-12-09 Thread Richard Gaskin
Stephen Barncard wrote: This is the big show stopper in my point of view towards smooth transitions across platforms. The reason? Dependencies on the old Mac OS toolbox display! Are you sure about this? I thought Quartz ruled now...the 'old toolbox' is long dead. With all due respect, X,

Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'

2005-12-09 Thread Thomas McGrath III
Actually, The newest version of OSX 10.4 has done away with the dependency on that API. Classic was changed in that release. Tom On Dec 9, 2005, at 1:48 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: But in the meantime, it's my limited understanding that there are a few remnant dependencies on the old APIs.

Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'

2005-12-09 Thread Thomas McGrath III
What secret Damn, I knew I was out of the loop.. Tom On Dec 9, 2005, at 1:57 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: With all that I've put out into the public, it's difficult to understand how it could be mistaken for trying to keep Rev a secret. :) -- Richard Gaskin

Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'

2005-12-09 Thread Ken Ray
You have two products for two different markets. We educators/hobbyists would like dreamcard to be distributed for free across the world. Professionals like Richard, Chipp and Ken and others are worried about keeping their competitive advantage and have the tool remain expensive and

Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'

2005-12-09 Thread Thomas McGrath III
Ken, I too paid $999.00 and now pay $499 to upgrade each year and consider it a bargain. I not only doubled my salary but also started my own business (no profits yet ;-) ) and get to pursue this as a hobby as well. What a deal. AND now I get to play with Robots too. Tom On Dec 9, 2005,

RE: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'

2005-12-09 Thread MisterX
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Ray Sent: Friday, 09 December, 2005 20:20 To: Use Revolution List Subject: Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?' You have two products for two different markets. We educators/hobbyists would like dreamcard to be distributed for free

RE: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'

2005-12-09 Thread MisterX
is Konfabulator 'Pretty?' Are you sure about this? I thought Quartz ruled now...the 'old toolbox' is long dead. With all due respect, X, your mac knowledge seems to end around 1995. sqb CThis is the big show stopper in my point of view towards smooth transitions across platforms

Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'

2005-12-09 Thread Richard Gaskin
MisterX wrote: I think that if rev re-implemented userlevels they not only would make rev more hypercard like I've long wished for enough time to make DeadCard: a pixel-for-pixel copy of HC's IDE for the Rev engine, with all the limitations: monchrome, force people to select only one object

Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'

2005-12-09 Thread Chipp Walters
Marielle Lange wrote: Professionals like Richard, Chipp and Ken and others are worried about keeping their competitive advantage and have the tool remain expensive and relatively unknown (at the very least maintain the existence of a cost of switching via the license fee and time to

Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'

2005-12-09 Thread Mark Swindell
No verification, but I've always felt your comment below re:Director is why Apple let Hypercard languish in the first place, never gave it even decent color, etc. HC's rep was so tarnished by all the unsightly crap put out there by the rest of us that they didn't want it associated in any

Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'

2005-12-09 Thread Bill Marriott
You mean, like how they abandoned desktop publishing because of all the horrid newsletters that sprung into existence? And how the web never took off because of all the ugly sites? :) Bill Mark Swindell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] HC's rep was so tarnished by

Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'

2005-12-09 Thread Mark Swindell
I think they were ok with HyperCard staying a fun toy for amateurs, but they didn't want to blur the line by giving it full-blown professional UI potential. Then their platform would have been populated by half-baked applications that worked poorly but which could have appeared superficially

Why did HyperCard wither away? [was: Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?']

2005-12-09 Thread Bill Marriott
Well, I had the good fortune to be at Claris during the HyperCard transition. I knew the development team and the product managers well. I don't think it was anything so deliberate/nefarious as you surmise. - Claris didn't know how to make money on a program that had been given away for free.

Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'

2005-12-09 Thread Judy Perry
I had forgotten that the 'Konfabulator' thread was about anything other than the previously-solved clock problem, so I only was alerted to Heather's post in Marielle's reply. My post wasn't directed at anyone in particular. I appreciate much of what Heather has said. I was an early critic of

Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'

2005-12-09 Thread Judy Perry
But... Isn't there all kinds of truly gawdawful 'Made with VB' etc. crap available? Judy On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Mark Swindell wrote: No verification, but I've always felt your comment below re:Director is why Apple let Hypercard languish in the first place, never gave it even decent color,

RE: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'

2005-12-09 Thread Scott Kane
Isn't there all kinds of truly gawdawful 'Made with VB' etc. crap available? Yes, there is. But also applies to Delphi, C++ Builder, Java, Visual C++, Visual Foxpro and you will shudder when you see an application aimed at the Mac in Lazarus (based on the Free Pascal compiler) which ignores

Re: What Rev Needs -- Again (was Why is Konfabulator Pretty?)

2005-12-08 Thread David Bovill
On 7 Dec 2005, at 02:02, Dan Shafer wrote: Another thing that would surely help would be to get RunRev on Linux really cooking; so many of the young programmers I know and hear about are Linux-savvy. My experience too - it has been the only way I have ever succeeded interesting any truly

Re: What Rev Needs -- Again (was Why is Konfabulator Pretty?)

2005-12-08 Thread Richard Gaskin
David Bovill wrote: My experience too - it has been the only way I have ever succeeded interesting any truly bright under 25 year olds - the main thing that puts them off is the lack of an open source strategy. They go yeah this is great - but is it open source? Now it does not need to be

Re: What Rev Needs -- Again (was Why is Konfabulator Pretty?)

2005-12-08 Thread David Bovill
On 8 Dec 2005, at 18:18, Richard Gaskin wrote: My experience too - it has been the only way I have ever succeeded interesting any truly bright under 25 year olds - the main thing that puts them off is the lack of an open source strategy. They go yeah this is great - but is it open

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-08 Thread Marielle Lange
Crossing the Chasm is a good read. Recommended reading in the entrepreneurship course I currently follow. Recommended by various visiting speakers in the course. Didn't have to read it yet though. Marielle

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-08 Thread Marielle Lange
Hi Bill, Good to know that you have now reached second stage: acceptance :-). Revolution is not Konfabulator. So the question is, WHY aren't there more of them for Rev? The K. site lists over 1500 widgets that do everything from display RSS feeds to displaying the current position of the

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-08 Thread Marielle Lange
Bill and Tom, You may be interested to know that I have started doing something vaguely along these lines in revolution. Rather than the konfab approach, I have taken the mozilla one (konfab is a thing of the past, the *new* thing is mozilla ;-) ). XUL is an xml specification to define

Re: What Rev Needs -- Again (was Why is Konfabulator Pretty?)

2005-12-08 Thread Marielle Lange
Hi Sarah, Many educators on this list share this view. All kids should be initiated to revolution. Me and others have proposed a hand for initiatives that may help Revolution gain a better visibility and recognition in the education arena. But we have been facing the same difficulties as

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-08 Thread Thomas McGrath III
Marielle, Bill spurred me on with his wish that REV had a more hip UI. I thought that a template with some buttonGadget style simplicity and some guidelines for coding in Rev would pave the way for a series of simple apps (widgets, dashboards, etc.) I have two projects in the works right

Re: What Rev Needs -- Again (was Why is Konfabulator Pretty?)

2005-12-08 Thread Sarah Reichelt
Many thanks Marielle, The schools have just finished for the year down under, but you can be sure that in January, I will be sending Jack off to school well armed with this other Rev propaganda :-) Cheers, Sarah On 12/9/05, Marielle Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Sarah, Many educators

Re: What Rev Needs -- Again (was Why is Konfabulator Pretty?)

2005-12-08 Thread Judy Perry
I agree with Marielle.. The product needs to be visible -- very visible -- at such edu biggies as Edu-CAUSE (is it still there?), NECC, etc./whatever. I'd be happy to do what I could -- NECC is in my backyard next year (San Diego), but, being an untenured faculty, I haven't the foggiest idea how

Re: Why is Konfabulator 'Pretty?'

2005-12-08 Thread MisterX
Marielle, Bill and Tom ;) I've been studying XUL and while it's a great concept, remember that it's limited to the mozilla engine. There's been recent discussions on Slashdot about the disadvantages of Ajax and not the last of them but even MS is throwing it's copycat cloners into XAML - their

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread Bill Marriott
Richard, Even for so-called HIG-compliant applications, Rev is behind the times. Look at the menus in Microsoft Office 2003. That is the current state of the art. Look how Visual Basic Express creates menus that look exactly like those. Rev does not. Rev cannot directly support even icons in

Re: What Rev Needs -- Again (was Why is Konfabulator Pretty?)

2005-12-07 Thread Eric Chatonet
Hi Scott, Great post. When I was a journalist for the French edition of MacWorld, I talked during seven years about HyperCard and then got many posts from users: they were of all ages from nine to more than eighty with a level average of twenty-five :-) Old times... As for me, I feel very

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread Bill Marriott
I don't have a Macintosh so I can't say -- do you get gel buttons? Are tabbed controls presented the way they are on built-for-OS X apps? I looked up the video tutorials for Rev on a Mac screen, and I'm happy to see these *are* implemented the Mac OS X way. Excellent. Bill

Re: Re: What Rev Needs -- Again (was Why is Konfabulator Pretty?)

2005-12-07 Thread Roger Guay
-- Again (was Why is Konfabulator Pretty?) To: How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Yeah right, such an old guy..what are you now? 33? Hey, you were in diapers when some of us were

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread Thomas McGrath III
Bill, I use OSX all of the time and also see the look and feel correctly. I just bought a Sony Laptop and hooked up a 20 monitor side by side with my 23 Apple cinema display. I am using XP pro and Office 2003. I am noticing just how far windows has come in look and feel. I am just

Re: What Rev Needs -- Again (was Why is Konfabulator Pretty?)

2005-12-07 Thread Jim Hurley
Scott Rossi wrote; As a matter of fact, since the accusations are hurling, flames are flying, and there's generally a lot of smoke and debris around, I'd like to take this opportunity throw some fuel on a different fire. I'll try and put this as non-ageist as I can: Rev developers are

Re: What Rev Needs -- Again (was Why is Konfabulator Pretty?)

2005-12-07 Thread Jim Hurley
On further thought, I probably overstated RR's position on TG. I can't say that they have committed themselves to implementing same; I think their position was that they are interested and recognized the importance and significance of TG in education. Jim

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread J. Landman Gay
Bill Marriott wrote: Richard, Even for so-called HIG-compliant applications, Rev is behind the times. If you mean that Rev should implement some of your suggested HIG enhancements automatically, then yes, I think you are probably right. However, almost everything you mention can already be

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread Bill Marriott
Ah, yes, well that is the Windows Theme Manager for you :) I think Rev emulates the look of XP, and doesn't actually pull from the actual OS... this is why it doesn't respond to changes made in the Windows appearance manager. In other words, if you customize the look and feel of Windows with

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread Bill Marriott
Hi Jacqueline, You wrote, Rev cannot directly support even icons in menus, which has been around many years. Rev does support this. What you need to use are stack menus, rather than the simple button menus which are the default. I tried looking up stack menu in the docs. I found: You

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread Chipp Walters
Thomas, Fortunately for you and the list, Bill is incorrect in his assessment. I've tested 3 seperate themes on Win XP and they all dsplay correctly in Rev, so it does actually pull from the actual OS. I seem to remember testing this for Tuviah when he was implementing theme support for WinXP

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread Chipp Walters
Well Bill, sometimes you just need to dig a bit. While natively, RR doesn't support many of the features, there are tools which do, and most of them are free. Hope the following helps (see below).. Bill Marriott wrote: Hi Jacqueline, You wrote, Rev cannot directly support even icons in

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread Bill Marriott
Chipp, In other words, if you customize the look and feel of Windows with a utility like WindowsBlinds, it doesn't necessarily translate to every UI component in Rev. Many effects work. It does pull in the title bar style, and I think the progress bar style. It does not pull in window

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread Ken Ray
On 12/7/05 2:36 AM, Bill Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bill, I think your final sentences really summed up your thoughts on this: Modern look-and-feel is undeniably one of Revolution's weaknesses. Improving this is one component of several things Rev should do to be successful and

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread Chipp Walters
Bill, It gets the theme parts right from where I sit. The large fonts isn't part of a theme, it's another setting and even Microsoft itself doesn't support Large fonts fully. Try setting Large Fonts to 'Extra Large' and then close and open the Display properties window and you see it doesn't

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread Chipp Walters
Bill, It gets the theme parts right from where I sit. The large fonts isn't part of a theme, it's another setting and even Microsoft itself doesn't support Large fonts fully. Try setting Large Fonts to 'Extra Large' and then close and open the Display properties window and you see it doesn't

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread Bill Marriott
Chipp, I know you didn't mention button styles specifically as being taken directly from the OS, but once you see the following difference it will be one of those details that pop out at you all the time: http://wjm.org/linked/buttons.htm Again, *very* minor, probably not obvious to the vast

RE: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread Lynch, Jonathan
Bill, You can make a menu have any look you want, using a stack as a menu - not just icons, but all sorts of complex layouts. But yes, just use icon-sized images in the substack serving as the source for your menu, and you will get icons in your menu. Every system has predesigned elements that

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread Chipp Walters
Bill, A picture is indeed worth a thousand words! I prefer the VB placement of text. My best guess is that we're both *sorta* correct ;-) I believe Revolution 'builds' the buttons using the correct theme 'bits', but probably doesn't use the direct API call to do so. 'Course I could be

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread Ken Ray
On 12/7/05 12:52 PM, Chipp Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Web browser control. You can launch a web browser with a URL. Not sure what other control you mean. Ken Ray just offered up a great script for this in the MetaCard forum. Perhaps he'll share it here? Also revGoURL will launch a

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread Bill Marriott
Ken, Thanks a lot for this post! I hope your excellent summary will help settle the debate on this. I didn't imagine my recommendations would spur a major row, but I am kind of glad they did. We ended up really getting into some nitty gritty stuff and I hope this was useful to the RunRev staff

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread Mark Wieder
Chipp- Wednesday, December 7, 2005, 11:57:29 AM, you wrote: My best guess is that we're both *sorta* correct ;-) I believe Revolution 'builds' the buttons using the correct theme 'bits', but probably doesn't use the direct API call to do so. 'Course I could be I believe you're right, since

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread Dave LeYanna
Just to let Rev. know... So do I, so will I dave Bill Marriott wrote: clip... I simply love xTalk, and Rev is keeping this great language very much alive. It really is an impressive tool overall; I'll be buying upgrades for as long as they are offered. Bill -- Dave LeYanna

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread Klaus Major
Hi Bill, Chipp, I know you didn't mention button styles specifically as being taken directly from the OS, but once you see the following difference it will be one of those details that pop out at you all the time: http://wjm.org/linked/buttons.htm Again, *very* minor, probably not

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread Bill Marriott
Yeah, VB lets you put a 16x16 icon to the left of button text, it lets you create buttons that have the little drop-down arrow to the right for menus or palettes, it has properties for whether the button appears in a menu strip, whether the cursor assumes a special shape when over it... it is

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread Ken Ray
On 12/7/05 2:18 PM, Bill Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You are also correct that Rev *does* face unique challenges when designing a cross-platform development tool. It's very difficult to exactly support every little detail of an OS while still enabling you to easily write once, deploy

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread Thomas McGrath III
SUCH A TEASE On Dec 7, 2005, at 12:05 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: I also know that the company is well aware of some of the things you ask for, and they aren't ignoring that. Stay tuned. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED] HyperActive Software |

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread Bill Marriott
Chipp, Your high-quality plugins (among others) are exactly what needs to be incorporated into the core Rev functionality. I hope Rev considers licensing them and writes you a handsome check :) Bill Chipp Walters wrote Well Bill, sometimes you just need to dig a bit. While natively, RR

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread Thomas McGrath III
Bill, Chipp, That is definitely a different font and x height. HHMMM.. Glad to know this although it is a minor thing. All the same. Tom On Dec 7, 2005, at 2:43 PM, Bill Marriott wrote: Chipp, I know you didn't mention button styles specifically as being taken directly from the

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread Mark Wieder
Bill- Wednesday, December 7, 2005, 12:44:09 PM, you wrote: Comments on the properties list: I prefer the way that Rev separates out the properties (instead of one long list like this), but I'd rather they used tabs instead of a drop-down menu for the various categories. Note that the Yes,

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread Mark Wieder
Bill- Wednesday, December 7, 2005, 12:18:41 PM, you wrote: p.s.: One little nit is that all of the items I mentioned in earlier posts (specifically calendar popups, notification tray support) are definitely included with the current version of VBExpress. IMO the only real downside to VB is

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread J. Landman Gay
Bill Marriott wrote: I tried looking up stack menu in the docs. I found: You create a stack menu by laying out the menu items as buttons in a stack window, then setting the menuName property of a button in another stack to the menu stack's name. Clicking the button displays the menu stack as

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread Mark Wieder
Jacque- I apologize for assuming you were new to Rev. I've only seen your name on the list recently, so I made assumptions. I think 2 years of even casual use gives you enough experience to disqualify you as a newbie. In addition, Bill's list of suggestions for improving the IDE was

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-07 Thread Chipp Walters
Bill, Just in case you're wondering, there is also an altPropEditor at: http://www.altuit.com/webs/altuit2/altPluginDownload/Downloads.htm It's more like VB's. Richard Gaskin has one too in his Devolution set. best, Chipp Mark Wieder wrote: Bill- Wednesday, December 7, 2005, 12:44:09 PM,

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-06 Thread graham samuel
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 06:47:53 +0100, sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 8:52 PM -0200 12/4/05, Andre Garzia wrote: I still rate my interfaces using the ALSR rating scheme... ALSR stands for Almost-Like-Scott-Rossi, for example, when I finished my webeditor interface, I looked to it and thought:

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-06 Thread xavier . bury
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/12/2005 15:18:13: On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 06:47:53 +0100, sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 8:52 PM -0200 12/4/05, Andre Garzia wrote: I still rate my interfaces using the ALSR rating scheme... ALSR stands for Almost-Like-Scott-Rossi, for example, when I

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-06 Thread Stephen Barncard
You should search the list about two months back -- there was a heated thread about creating a clock in minimum code and processor load. Several on this list were competing for the cleanest, smartest code. It got down to less than 10 lines I think. I believe for certain that a widget like

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-06 Thread Bill Marriott
Stephen, I want to clear something up -- 1) I'm not trying to create the leanest, most efficient clock 2) I'm not trying to create a clock at all 3) I was trying to replicate exactly the look of a typical K. widget, which happened to be a clock, in order to prove that we as Rev users could do

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-06 Thread Richard Gaskin
Bill Marriott wrote: - if someone wants to create an exact replica of the K. clock in Rev, they should give up, which is what I did :) Or while we wait for enhancements to the rotate command just make any of the other widgets/gadgets that don't rely on that command, which would be 99.99% of

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-06 Thread Mark Wieder
Bill- Tuesday, December 6, 2005, 10:00:57 AM, you wrote: 3) I was trying to replicate exactly the look of a typical K. widget, which happened to be a clock, in order to prove that we as Rev users could do stuff just as cool as K. if we wanted to. Why? There are things runrev does really

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-06 Thread Bill Marriott
So the question is, WHY aren't there more of them for Rev? The K. site lists over 1500 widgets that do everything from display RSS feeds to displaying the current position of the International Space Station. HyperCard used to have this kind of excitement and buzz... Just 10 widgets that look

Re: Why is Konfabulator Pretty?

2005-12-06 Thread Thomas McGrath III
Bill, Do you know for certain that K does images in this way? I mean we know about this problem in Rev and I haven't used K to build widgets, But I do like the look and feel of them. When you build in K do the images truly rotate? or do they do something to them to look like they rotate?

  1   2   >