Mark
I suspect that writing a dynamic link library for use with Rebol is likely to
be easier than writing an external for Revolution. The Rebol language is
evaluated not compiled.
I found writing a dynamic link library with FPC quite straightforward though I
encountered two problems which I
You see, Richmond, what you needed was regular expressions.
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Writing-Externals-in-Pascal-tp2278157p2282719.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On 07/08/2010 10:06 PM, Peter Alcibiades wrote:
You see, Richmond, what you needed was regular expressions.
What I need is a da*n good holiday!
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to
Peter-
Monday, July 5, 2010, 4:59:11 PM, you wrote:
Free Pascal. At the moment, I am testing calling a dynamic load
library written in Free Pascal from Rebol (a language written in C)
using C calling conventions.
Keep us posted on your progress - that's a promising start.
--
-Mark Wieder
Whoa! Pascal still lives?? Maybe I am not so old after all.
Bob
On Jul 7, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Peter-
Monday, July 5, 2010, 4:59:11 PM, you wrote:
Free Pascal. At the moment, I am testing calling a dynamic load
library written in Free Pascal from Rebol (a language
The 2010 version of Delphi is a killer development environment and the 2011
version will have cross-compile for OS X. You can tell its what I do a lot
of work in!
Neal Campbell
Abroham Neal Software
www.abrohamnealsoftware.com
(540) 645 5394 NEW PHONE NUMBER
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 1:56 PM,
On 07/07/2010 08:56 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
Whoa! Pascal still lives?? Maybe I am not so old after all.
Bob
Sorry to dash your illusions; I studied PASCAL 5 in 1985;
Thee and Me are alive, and so is PASCAL; neither Thee, not
Me, nor PASCAL are as young as we were in 1985.
Hey; anybody
Peter,
Thanks for your tips from using Free Pascal with Rebol. You have
confirmed what I though from the Free Pascal Compiler (FPC)
documentation, that it should be able to make libraries that are
indistinguishable from those made from a C compiler.
Now it is more a question of time, as I
Hi All,
Trying to gauge the potential interest in a Revolution Externals SDK
that could allow you to develop externals in Lazarus/Free Pascal.
Instead of requiring some form of C/C++ wrapper, which is the only
language that is currently supported by the official Externals SDK.
To be able to
Alistair
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Writing-Externals-in-Pascal-tp2278157p2278201.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution
I would be interested in programming externals in Pascal but I am
not familiar with the pascal you mentioned so I can't comment on
the choice of pascal.
-=JB=-
On Jul 5, 2010, at 1:49 AM, RunRevPlanet wrote:
Hi All,
Trying to gauge the potential interest in a Revolution Externals
SDK that
Scott,
Been there as well. I remember many many many years ago talking about this
exact topic with members of the community and with if I recall, there were
some troubles in the way FPC generated the libraries, some linker stuff
which might not be a problem these days.
It would be a wonderful
Alistair,
Thank you for the offer. Nice to hear from another Delphi familiar. If I
start the project I will certainly let you know, if I need assistance.
-=JB=-,
Free Pascal is a cross platform Pascal compiler that does standard
Object Pascal plus more. It is also largely compatible with
Thanks for the info. I hope the problems can be resolved.
-=JB=-
On Jul 5, 2010, at 6:05 AM, RunRevPlanet wrote:
Alistair,
Thank you for the offer. Nice to hear from another Delphi familiar.
If I start the project I will certainly let you know, if I need
assistance.
-=JB=-,
Free
Scott-
Things may have changed with Delphi, but I fear you may run into the
problem I had back in 2004 when I attempted this. See bug #1526. The
issue was the inability to coax Borland compilers into the proper
combination of compiler options to export symbols that the runrev
engine would
Argh! I remember that bug in 2005...
just commented and voted on it again.
argh!
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net wrote:
Scott-
Things may have changed with Delphi, but I fear you may run into the
problem I had back in 2004 when I attempted this. See bug
-parties to develop add-ons.
Al
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Writing-Externals-in-Pascal-tp2278157p2278631.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Andre-
Monday, July 5, 2010, 8:35:01 AM, you wrote:
Argh! I remember that bug in 2005...
just commented and voted on it again.
argh!
I wouldn't bother wasting votes on this. I finally pulled my votes
away and put them to better use on other bug reports. It's
A) filed as an enhancement, so
Thanks for the extra tips. At this stage I have only done a quick read
of the documentation of the Free Pascal Compiler, but from what I have
read it appears more flexible than the Borland compilers in terms of the
libraries it can produce.
But I won't really know what it is capable of until
Hi Scott
I am also be interested in being able to develop externals in Free Pascal. At
the moment, I am testing calling a dynamic load library written in Free Pascal
from Rebol (a language written in C) using C calling conventions.
It is impossible to get the level
of granularity of compiler
20 matches
Mail list logo
