lockLoc OR LockSize? (but not both)

2010-02-03 Thread Mark Swindell
Is there a property for locking just the size of an object while allowing a manual move? Setting the lockLoc to true does locks down both size and location. If it isn't possible do each individually, why is that? Shouldn't it be possible? Thanks,

Re: lockLoc OR LockSize? (but not both)

2010-02-03 Thread Scott Rossi
Recently, Mark Swindell wrote: Is there a property for locking just the size of an object while allowing a manual move? Nope. Setting the lockLoc to true does locks down both size and location. Yes. If it isn't possible do each individually, why is that? Shouldn't it be possible?

Re: lockLoc OR LockSize? (but not both)

2010-02-03 Thread DunbarX
Is this so that one doesn't inadvertantly grab a handle and change the size? You can set a custom property and trap the resizecontrol message, I guess: The lockrect property might be something like 82,23 on resizecontrol set the width of me to item 1 of the lockRect of me set the

Re: lockLoc OR LockSize? (but not both)

2010-02-03 Thread zryip theSlug
2010/2/3 dunb...@aol.com: Is this so that one doesn't inadvertantly grab a handle and change the size? You can set a custom property and trap the resizecontrol message, I guess: The lockrect property might be something like 82,23 on resizecontrol set the width of me to item 1 of the

Re: lockLoc OR LockSize? (but not both)

2010-02-03 Thread Mark Swindell
That's what I thought, but wanted to be sure I wasn't missing something obvious. It makes no sense (to me) to have these be a joint property. They are two separate things. Example: I have several images I want to drag around and reposition on a card, but I also want to constrain their size