Can anyone here play WMV files on WIndows XP using Rev 2.8.1?
I made sure the Load QuickTime on startUp box in preferences is not
ticked.
I then built my 'Splash screen' as I have done many times on 2.6.1
with success.
[tested builds made on OS X and Windows XP with Rev 2.8.1]
I then
Recently, J. Landman Gay wrote:
This has been working fine on both Mac and Windows machines for several
hundred customers over the last 3 years until today, when one customer
says there is a playback problem. She's running XP Pro on a fast machine
with lots of RAM. When she chooses to play a
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:11:25 -0700 (PDT) Jan Schenkel wrote:
I just opened the Browser Sampler stack on my iMac/G5
OSX 10.4.9
- the button on the first screen worked fine
- when I tried to open the PDF example, Rev crashed
I reopened Revolution
- skipped the button on the first card
- the
OK folks, here's the cure for the crash in the Browser Sampler.rev
stack. It certainly cures it on my Mac Mini, and perhaps it will cure
the fleeting problems that one or two of you have experienced.
In stacks InetBrowser and FlashDemo, there is a card called
browserTest. Go to the last line
On 7 Jun 2007, at 03:59, J. Landman Gay wrote:
the script gets the currentTime, checks every 250 milliseconds, and
when the currentTime remains unchanged, assumes the playback is
done. Then it moves on to the next file.
From what you describe, it sounds like either the currentTime isn't
Now I've got another little problem with the Browser Sampler.rev stack
on my Mac Mini:
If I make a standalone out of the stack above, NOTHING works, including
simple navigation from one page to another!
OK, it's 12 minutes past 5 in the morning, and I'm going to bed..
Bob
Perhaps, because it's a new and very fast machine, so that the check about
the 250 msecs is done, before the mov is completely loaded?
Tiemo
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Dave Cragg
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. Juni 2007 10:02
An:
On 7 Jun 2007, at 07:06, Jim Sims wrote:
I made sure the Load QuickTime on startUp box in preferences is
not ticked.
You already reported this, didn't you?
http://quality.runrev.com/qacenter/show_bug.cgi?id=3848
Ian
___
use-revolution mailing
On Jun 7, 2007, at 11:08 AM, Ian Wood wrote:
On 7 Jun 2007, at 07:06, Jim Sims wrote:
I made sure the Load QuickTime on startUp box in preferences is
not ticked.
You already reported this, didn't you?
http://quality.runrev.com/qacenter/show_bug.cgi?id=3848
Ian
Yes, however I had an
The reason for the economic power of the open source model is the possibility
of derivative works.
This is the underlying reason why, were one consulting to Rev, it would be one
alternative one would advise exploring in depth. Not necessarily going down
that route in the end. But certainly
Like I said, GPL is not the only choice.
Cheers,
Luis.
On 7 Jun 2007, at 04:18, Chipp Walters wrote:
On 6/6/07, Luis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It does
not mean that whatever changes are made are forced upon you, as for
that same reason, you can change it.
GPL has given
us Linux, Firefox,
It puts the user directly in contact with the development process. In terms
of open source software the user is (or has been) the developer - so you you
get stability, quick bug fixes and security (if you are dealing with
paranoid sys admins), or chaos, multiple forks and experiments (if you are
I just discoverd strange things here on my PC:
Rev 2.8.1, WIN XP Home SP2.
In the msg:
put the long date - Tuesday, June 5, 2007
which is correct.
put the long system date - Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2007
which tells me it is wednesday (Mittwoch), NOT correct
?
Any hints are very welcome.
Thank
--- -= JB =- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I have some code written in C that was used in
HyperCard
and want to rewrite it for Revolution is the best
program to
use for the job Apple XCode 2.
Where can I find the best examples of XCode 2 being
used
in Revolution.
Are there versions of
On 6/7/07, Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you had a Home stack in Rev like there was in HyperCard, what would
you use it for?
Keep in mind that Rev is a different beast than HC, so let your
imagination run wild: What would you expect to see in a Rev Home stack?
I use a couple of
How would the world of software languages that we know of now be different?
Perhaps:
1. Visual Basic would not have had the success that it did as
companies re-hacked HyperTalk to fit their business needs
2. We'd have got colour and video and object orientation well ahead of
the
Oh no, we agree on something...
Cheers,
Luis.
On 7 Jun 2007, at 04:25, Chipp Walters wrote:
On 6/6/07, Samuel M. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem I have with runrev is not open source per se but that
with a paid model the incentive
is for the developer to release feature updates
And if you are looking at restrictions on freedom - equally scary is future
where hardware will not run software that is not copyright approved by a
built in DRM chipp - pun intended :) Now if you were a company with a large
library of software or digital content - that would be something worth
Hi Sarah,
...
In the msg:
put the long date - Tuesday, June 5, 2007
which is correct.
put the long system date - Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2007
which tells me it is wednesday (Mittwoch), NOT correct
?
Any hints are very welcome.
Thank you very much Klaus.
You're welcome :-)
I have had a few
Hi,
Does anyone know of some RunRev code that will take two absolute file
paths and return the relative path?
e.g. Frm
PathA = /documents/Folder1/Folder2
PathB = /documents/Folder3/Folder4
Produce PathB, which in this case would be:
../../Folder1/Folder4
Thanks a lot
All the Best
Dave
You could do a lot worse than look at the HyperCard Home stack as a
starting point for drawing in 'hobbyist' users (like me). If your Home
Stack is simply a launcher perhaps you could package different kinds of
Home stacks for different kinds of users - something along the lines of
the HC
On Jun 7, 2007, at 3:33 AM, Jan Schenkel wrote:
Hi John,
You'll certainly be interested in the short series
'External Writing for the Uninitiated' by Mark
Waddingham in the Revolution Newsletter:
http://www.runrev.com/newsletter/november/issue13/newsletter5.php
On 7. Jun 2007, at 08:06, Jim Sims wrote:
Can anyone here play WMV files on WIndows XP using Rev 2.8.1?
Yes, as long as QuickTime is not installed. If it is installed one would
have to set dontuseqt to true, but this leads to an error.
I did tests with stacks in its most simple form and I
On 6/6/07, Bob Warren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kay, [Is that correct? You put your initials HTH at the end of your
post.]
Actually the HTH was meant to mean Hope That Helps. My signature block is
automatically appended to my e-mails, but it's a gif file (in a successful
attempt to stop
That's the feeling I get when I see the age of some of the bugs...
Cheers,
Luis.
On 7 Jun 2007, at 10:39, Peter Alcibiades wrote:
Snipped.
But at some point, some of us will also quietly open up a browser,
drift over
to Amazon, and order Hetland's wonderful book on Python. And while
Hi Richard and all,
Le 7 juin 07 à 02:23, Richard Gaskin a écrit :
If you had a Home stack in Rev like there was in HyperCard, what would
you use it for?
Keep in mind that Rev is a different beast than HC, so let your
imagination run wild: What would you expect to see in a Rev Home
Hi folks, just came across an article here with a runrev connection:
http://www.theunion.com/article/20070606/NEWS/106060142
Not a whole lot of detail, but this apparently relates to teachMac and
teachIt being built with runrev.
This may be old news to some, but I hadn't heard this before...
wayne,
how come did you come across that paper ?
Did you type Runtime revolution and $2 million in google ?
just kidding...
JB
Hi folks, just came across an article here with a runrev connection:
http://www.theunion.com/article/20070606/NEWS/106060142
Not a whole lot of detail, but this
Hi JB!
I have a google news filter set up to flag hypercard references and this
article mentioned it so it showed up in the results.
The filters work great for things that aren't making a lot of headlines
anymore because you aren't inundated with too much stuff, but it catches
lots of
The first thing I do upon launching Rev/MC is click the Tool btn on
the Home stack to open the Tools menu, then close the Home stack.
One thing I would not want is more front and back scripts added. I
recently spent many hours trying to find out why my own frontscript
mouseup handler wasn't
Eric Chatonet wrote:
It could display different things according to a kind of user level
from a simple stack launcher to a lib and plugin manager, environment
info and much more.
The stacks launcher would includes presentation stacks, videos and
templates for beginners as well as more
Hi All,
New issue:
Standalone settings for Legacy stacks are stored in separate Config
stacks, while those settings are internal in the current stack format.
If one is distributing a stack to be used by developers to build
standalones (eg: SDB_Server, SDB_Utilities):
* If saved in legacy
function file_GetRelativePath someFileOrFolder, baseFolder, @commonPath
put the itemdelimiter into originalDelim
set the itemdelimiter to /
put empty into commonPath
put someFileOrFolder into relativePath
put 0 into itemNum
repeat with itemNum = 1 to the number of items of
I did not attend the conference, but my friend did and brought back
this transcript:
http://truetech.org/pages/RW07Keynote.php
Some interesting information can be gleaned from the transcript. It
looks like RealBasic is claiming to have ~170 K users (Mac, Windows,
Linux combined) and
There are a lot of people here who cut their teeth on HC. It would be
facinating to see everyone's favorite design for a modern home stack.
Anyone up for a design contest?
Over the weekend I found a Mac SE/30 peaking sadly out of the back of a
closet. It was an interesting experience firing it up
Hi Richard,
I think that a kind of brainstorming from different users and
programmers (all have not the same needs) could be interesting to
list features that would be nice to have according to three levels:
1. Beginners
2. Hobbyists
3. Pros *
* Actually, pros don't need a home stack or
Quick programming note:
put the itemdelimiter into originalDelim
...
set the itemdelimiter to originalDelim
is not necessary the way you have structured your function. Rev will
consider the itemDelimiter at the start of each handler to be the default
itemDelimiter, which is usually a
I did not attend the conference, but my friend did and
brought back this transcript:
http://truetech.org/pages/RW07Keynote.php
Some interesting information can be gleaned from the
transcript. It looks like RealBasic is claiming to have
~170 K users (Mac, Windows, Linux combined)
Eric Chatonet wrote:
I think that a kind of brainstorming from different users and
programmers (all have not the same needs) could be interesting to
list features that would be nice to have according to three levels:
1. Beginners
2. Hobbyists
3. Pros *
* Actually, pros don't need a home
Shari wrote:
The first thing I do upon launching Rev/MC is click the Tool btn on
the Home stack to open the Tools menu, then close the Home stack.
Me too. One more reason to have any Home stack operate like RevOnline,
with an option to let the user determine if it opens on launch or not.
I look at this task differently and offer it as an example to study to see
various ways Rev let's you accomplish the same thing. David's solution will
make more sense to some and be easier to program, so they should follow that
direction. My approach is to use the Rev chunk expressions to get to
Rob Cozens wrote:
Standalone settings for Legacy stacks are stored in separate Config
stacks, while those settings are internal in the current stack format.
If one is distributing a stack to be used by developers to build
standalones (eg: SDB_Server, SDB_Utilities):
* If saved in legacy
Perhaps:
1. HyperTalk is never converted from an interpreted language to a
compiled one - no one wants to commit the resources
2. Five different developers rewrite the HC engine to support five
different ways of adding color
3. Businesses refuse to touch HC because there are 20 different
On Jun 6, 2007, at 5:09 PM, Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:
I realize it would take a lot of initial work, but you guys seem up
for it: why not just use a lookup table with the exact values you
need for each font condition listed?
Hi Joe,
I think the time to research all of the possible
On Jun 6, 2007, at 4:47 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
So it's font dependent and we're back where we started. :( You may
be stuck with your images after all, since there is no good way to
read the actual positioning of the glyph inside its text box.
I think I will post a feature request for
Congrats, Trevor. If you've come up with an acceptable handler that
performs well, then my suggestion is entirely moot at this time. I'm
surprised that you were able to come up with a good solution in the
time frame you mention. Great!
Joe Wilkins
On Jun 7, 2007, at 9:24 AM, Trevor DeVore
Hi Everyone,
Is there a way to hide or relocate the toolbar in the IDE? Since I never
leave the IDE the toolbar sometimes gets in the way.
Joe
**
See what's free at
http://www.aol.com.
___
use-revolution mailing
I know there was some discussion regarding how to get Revolution 2.6.1
to adopt the current theme in Linux, and I did some research and I
just couldn't seem to understand what I needed to do to make my program
use the current theme of Gnome.
I tried creating environmental variables to the path of
As a team member of one of the longest-running Rev-based open source
projects, the MC IDE, I share much of the enthusiasm for the benefits of
the process and, with more than a dozen others, have translated that
enthusiasm into action.
But on balance, I believe a lot of that success is due to
Derek,
Ken did a great job summarizing this issue at:
http://www.sonsothunder.com/devres/revolution/tips/lin002.htm
try this out and let us know if you have any problems.
--
cb
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please
What's impressive is that it did it with very little ram and drive
space. Tight code, little bloat. It had to be. I still cringe at the
size of my 25mb application. But I NEED all that stuff in there
Over the weekend I found a Mac SE/30 peaking sadly out of the back of a
closet. It was
On Jun 7, 2007, at 9:34 AM, Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:
Congrats, Trevor. If you've come up with an acceptable handler that
performs well, then my suggestion is entirely moot at this time.
I'm surprised that you were able to come up with a good solution in
the time frame you mention. Great!
David, I think you may have answered the How do we pay the piper?
question here:
I'd beg to differ with Lynn that this stuff is only for the big boys - like
Adobe, IBM, Google or Yahoo. The developers of Base Camp have a good
business, they build upon the developer community they created with
Chris,
Thank you for letting me know about that article. Sometimes I
completely forget about the excellent collection of tips and tricks that
Ken Ray has compiled.
And I have to agree with Ken, it would be so much better when the next
linux version comes out and there is no need for the
Look, I don't want to get us off into off-topic flame wars, and I don't think
necessarily that going Open Source is the answer for Rev, or that it would
have been for HC. Its worth serious consideration is all I would argue.
But you have to say that these remarks really misrepresent the Open
Scott Rossi wrote:
Recently, J. Landman Gay wrote:
This has been working fine on both Mac and Windows machines for several
hundred customers over the last 3 years until today, when one customer
says there is a playback problem. She's running XP Pro on a fast machine
with lots of RAM. When she
From: Lynn Fredricks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are a lot of people here who cut their teeth on HC. It would be
facinating to see everyone's favorite design for a modern home stack.
Anyone up for a design contest?
This facinates me as it appeals to the marketer in me. g I'd love for
their to
Dave Cragg wrote:
On 7 Jun 2007, at 03:59, J. Landman Gay wrote:
the script gets the currentTime, checks every 250 milliseconds, and
when the currentTime remains unchanged, assumes the playback is done.
Then it moves on to the next file.
From what you describe, it sounds like either the
Tiemo Hollmann TB wrote:
Perhaps, because it's a new and very fast machine, so that the check about
the 250 msecs is done, before the mov is completely loaded?
Maybe, it's possible. But I thought the handler paused until the file
was loaded, or the loading failed.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay
wayne durden wrote:
Hi folks, just came across an article here with a runrev connection:
http://www.theunion.com/article/20070606/NEWS/106060142
Not a whole lot of detail, but this apparently relates to teachMac and
teachIt being built with runrev.
This may be old news to some, but I hadn't
OK, so I found a cure for the functioning of Rev's Browser Sampler
Stack in Rev/Mac 2.8.1 using my Mac Mini.
When I make a standalone, nothing works - even when trying to navigate
from one page to another. But in relation to this, I am prepared to
believe provisionally that this stack is too
Hi Jacque!
You mean the article text or the underlying teachMac technology? I assume
the latter...but not quite sure?
Wayne
On 6/7/07, J. Landman Gay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wayne durden wrote:
Hi folks, just came across an article here with a runrev connection:
Hi Richard,
AFAIK the standalone settings are stored in custom properties, and
do not rely on anything specific to the new format for storage.
First, let's make sure we're talking apples apples: by standalone
settings, I am referring to the standalone build settings:
platform(s) to build
On 07/06/07, Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David, I think you may have answered the How do we pay the piper?
question here:
I think it's along the right lines - I think there are opportunities
regarding the Linux version etc.
The folks at Base Camp have visibility, but do revenues
Richard Gaskin wrote:
While the Home stack is in the message path in both HyperCard and Rev,
it isn't among the backScripts. BackScripts were introduced in
SuperCard and later added to MetaCard/Revolution, but that specific
mechanism was never supported in HyperCard.
HyperCard did support
I'd beg to differ with Lynn that this stuff is only for the
big boys - like Adobe, IBM, Google or Yahoo. The developers
of Base Camp have a good business, they build upon the
developer community they created with Ruby on Rails. They get
a lot of work. Nor did they need to raise heaps of
wayne durden wrote:
Hi Jacque!
You mean the article text or the underlying teachMac technology? I assume
the latter...but not quite sure?
Byron Turner is one of my clients and I wrote TeachMac/TeachIT for him.
We will start the next version modifications soon.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay
What's browserEnsure..I don't see that in the documenation anywhere and I
don't see it defined in the code you've shown.
--
cb
On 6/7/07, Bob Warren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, so I found a cure for the functioning of Rev's Browser Sampler
Stack in Rev/Mac 2.8.1 using my Mac Mini.
When I
Rob Cozens wrote:
In Legacy format versions of RunRev, Build Distribution saves the
settings in [stack name] Config.rev, NOT in the source stack itself.
So Build Distribution in Legacy format versions expects to find the
distribution settings in a separate Config stack and the post-Legacy
On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:13:35 -0500, Derek Bump wrote:
Chris,
Thank you for letting me know about that article. Sometimes I
completely forget about the excellent collection of tips and tricks that
Ken Ray has compiled.
Thanks, Derek!
And I have to agree with Ken, it would be so much
Bob Warren wrote:
So I decide to make a simple stack to test the revBrowser. From RR
Newletter Issue 26, I construct the following stack:
--THIS IS IN THE CARD SCRIPT:
snip
--THIS IS THE ERROR MESSAGE I GET:
Type Handler: can't find handler
Object card id 1002
Line browserEnsure
Bob Warren wrote:
As a matter of fact, I wasn't aware of the fact that there is such a
thing as a demo version. I thought that it was all the same piece of
software that could be activated either by a demo unlocking code or a
licensed unlocking code.** If that is simply another way of viewing
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 20:48:35 -0800, Doug Heywood wrote:
The only thing I wonder about would be some mysterious parameter I
could include in my open process statement which would actually
stimulate the program to run, but I obviously don't know.
Doug, are you using open process app or open
This is probably a stupid question. And I swear I've done this in the
past, but I can't for the life of me remember how I did it.
I need to launch an application from within a script, but I need my
script to wait for the application to close before continuing. I've
tried launch, open
Richard Gaskin wrote:
A lot of folks here used to cry out for free bug-fix upgrades, but last
time Rev delivered one they complained it didn't address all of them and
left out too many feature requests. ;)
-
The other day, I put forward a
First of all, Bob,
We appreciate your efforts, but what you suggest just won't ever
happen. Even if we expand the word single to be several hundred,
the number of builds necessitated by that approach would be enormous,
and we'd all be driven absolutely out of our minds. Right now, it's
On 07/06/07, Lynn Fredricks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can see between 37 Signals and Runtime, but a whole
lot of differences too. That doesn't mean those moves are going to be
equally successful for any other company.
Agreed - it doesn't. The devil is in the detail. In an email I can only
A little hard Joe?
On 07/06/07, Joe Lewis Wilkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First of all, Bob,
We appreciate your efforts, but what you suggest just won't ever
happen
But it is just more
convenient for all of us to get a single new package, rather than a
number of different ones of
Do I remember reading that there is a recent feature / supported /
unsupported for permanent stack ids (I know that the ids change as objects
are added)?
Can't find it anywhere - I'm looking to use a permanent id that will survive
stack modifications and (file) name changes.
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 13:11:10 -0600, Chris Sheffield wrote:
This is probably a stupid question. And I swear I've done this in the
past, but I can't for the life of me remember how I did it.
I need to launch an application from within a script, but I need my
script to wait for the
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:06:44 +0100, David Bovill wrote:
Do I remember reading that there is a recent feature / supported /
unsupported for permanent stack ids (I know that the ids change as objects
are added)?
Can't find it anywhere - I'm looking to use a permanent id that will survive
Huh!
I'm not just getting old, I'm getting blind with it! Would somebody like
to teach me how to read? :-[
I'll put the browserEnsure handler in and let you know how it runs.
Thanks Jacque and Chris.
Bob
___
use-revolution mailing list
In my limited industrial experience, it is far better to fall short of
an ideal future model that you slowly edging towards than it is to work
in a mess.
Bob
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to
Being redundantly lazy - I often copy scripts around - resetting the
itemdelim ensures it woks when pasted into another handler.
On 07/06/07, Jim Ault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quick programming note:
put the itemdelimiter into originalDelim
...
set the itemdelimiter to originalDelim
Ken Ray wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:06:44 +0100, David Bovill wrote:
Do I remember reading that there is a recent feature / supported /
unsupported for permanent stack ids (I know that the ids change as objects
are added)?
Can't find it anywhere - I'm looking to use a permanent id that will
Jacque,
you know that you're an inspiration for us all :-D
Congratulations on that software! :-D
Cheers
andre
On 6/7/07, J. Landman Gay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wayne durden wrote:
Hi Jacque!
You mean the article text or the underlying teachMac technology? I assume
the latter...but
Is there a way to hide or relocate the toolbar in the IDE? Since I never
leave the IDE the toolbar sometimes gets in the way.
Check out the View menu. Toolbar Text Toolbar Icons are both
checked by default. Unchecking both hides the Toolbar completely.
Unchecking either one makes it smaller.
Chipp-
OOPS, not so fast...have you seen the stir GPL 3 is causing?
Luckily, GPL3 is still just a draft at this point. There's hope that the FSF
folks will still come to their senses, or that folks will just avoid GPL3
and go with Creative Commons licensing instead.
On Jun 7, 2007, at 12:49 PM, David Bovill wrote:
Its easy to say that RunRev is not Adobe, but I would be
interested in your thinking as to why RunRev could not make as good a
business out of open sourcing core parts of the C++ engine in a
similar way
to 37Signals or MySQL in its early days.
Think of them as handler locals that
one, are defined as the default at the start of the handler
two, can be set/reset affecting only the current handler
three, expire when the handler does.
This makes calling a series of functions easier, such as
set the itemDel to tab --does not matter outside
On 6/7/07 2:48 PM, Sarah Reichelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to hide or relocate the toolbar in the IDE? Since I never
leave the IDE the toolbar sometimes gets in the way.
Check out the View menu. Toolbar Text Toolbar Icons are both
checked by default. Unchecking both hides
On 07/06/07, Mark Wieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ttp://www.linspire.com/linspire_letter.php
http://creativecommons.org/
I thought of using Creative Commons licenses for software a while back -
some people do. But it is not recommended by the lawyers :)
On 07/06/07, Trevor DeVore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adobe did not open source Flex Builder, Flex Data
Services or Flash itself - just the Flex framework. At least that is
what I've read in articles discussing the topic.
Not sure - but whats missing from this:
Adobe plans to release all of
Trevor DeVore wrote:
On Jun 7, 2007, at 12:49 PM, David Bovill wrote:
Its easy to say that RunRev is not Adobe, but I would be
interested in your thinking as to why RunRev could not make as good a
business out of open sourcing core parts of the C++ engine in a
similar way to 37Signals or
On Jun 7, 2007, at 3:34 PM, David Bovill wrote:
Not sure - but whats missing from this:
Adobe plans to release all of the components of the Flex SDK
needed to
create Flex applications, including the Java source code for the
ActionScript and MXML compilers, the ActionScript debugger, and the
On 08/06/07, Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And since the engine remains free for CGI use, the differences for most
folks are pretty minor.
Beg to differ :) If the cgi engine had been open - several years back I
would have a crack at creating an Apache module. I had quite some
On Jun 7, 2007, at 4:19 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Just to clarify, Ruby on Rails (I assume that is what you are
referring to when you mention 37Signals) is a framework built for
an already existing development language.
I believe Ruby itself is also open source, governed by the LGPL.
On 08/06/07, Trevor DeVore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 7, 2007, at 3:34 PM, David Bovill wrote:
Not sure - but whats missing from this:
Adobe plans to release all of the components of the Flex SDK
needed to
create Flex applications, including the Java source code for the
ActionScript
Just for the record, this displays beeootifully on my Mac Mini.
The standalone works fine (not too heavy).
Add a button and an image called Browser Rect ** to your stack first:
--
CARD SCRIPT:
local sBrowserId =
# Opens the
At 4:12 PM -0300 6/7/07, Bob Warren wrote:
1. RR should provide feature releases on a regular basis. We pay for them.
And we'll be getting them. It's in the roadmap, and Kevin is sticking to it.
2. We do not pay for bugfixes. The manufacturer is just putting
right what he has done wrong.
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
