On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Jesse McConnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com wrote:
try LexicalUUIDType, that will distinguish the secs correctly
imo based on the existing impl (last I checked at least) TimeUUIDType
was equivalent to LongType
It uses to be true that the TimeUUIDType comparator
There are forEach methods in that would allow you to travel the
keys/values/entries w/o creating the extra object (entries)
From: Tatu Saloranta [tsalora...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 11:58 PM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Trove
Transactions are orthogonal to the design of Cassandra
Sorry, Would you want to tell me what is an orthogonal mean in this
context??
honestly I do not understand what is it.
Thank you.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Miguel Verde miguelitov...@gmail.comwrote:
No, as far as I know no one is
In general what is the difference between Cassandra and HBase??
Thanks.
orthogonal means go to the opposite direction, but without going
back. Including transaction in Cassandra needs to turn 90 degrees
the design of Cassandra.
Kind regards,
Benoit.
2010/4/24 dir dir sikerasa...@gmail.com:
Transactions are orthogonal to the design of Cassandra
Sorry, Would you
orthogonal means 90 degrees. Two lines are orthogonal if the
cross at 90 degrees.
Two ideas are orthogonal means that they are not compatible.
Transactions is orthogonal with Cassandra's design means that it will
require a lot of work and trade-off to implement transactions into
Cassandra.
Is
Ok in this particular context it means no dependencies.
Thanks for your precision.
Kind regards,
Benoit.
2010/4/24 Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Benoit Perroud ben...@noisette.ch wrote:
orthogonal means 90 degrees. Two lines are orthogonal if the
No, it just means they don't have dependencies on each other. In this
case, it means you could create a transactional layer on top of
cassandra, without having to make it part of the core.
Now I Understand, thank you.
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
http://ria101.wordpress.com/2010/02/24/hbase-vs-cassandra-why-we-moved/
http://spyced.blogspot.com/2009/03/why-i-like-cassandra.html
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 10:20 AM, dir dir sikerasa...@gmail.com wrote:
In general what is the difference between Cassandra and HBase??
Thanks.
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Heath Oderman he...@526valley.com wrote:
Really interesting find.
After Jonathan E. suggested py_stress and it seemed clear the problem was in
my .net client I spent a few days debugging the client in detail.
I ended up changing my CassandraContext
Is this something that also needs to be managed in Java? In most examples
I've seen, connections are created like this:
TSocket socket = new TSocket(location, thriftport)
TBinaryProtocol binaryProtocol = new
TBinaryProtocol(socket, false, false);
Yes, one should use either the TBufferedTransport or TFramedTransport
in Java for performance reasons. These are analogous to the C# Socket
classes and you should see a performance improvement from buffering.
On Apr 24, 2010, at 5:31 PM, Joost Ouwerkerk jo...@openplaces.org
wrote:
Is
Hi Paul,
I have already read Jonathan Ellis's Blog today
(http://spyced.blogspot.com/2009/03/why-i-like-cassandra.html)
in this blog, Jonathan tried to explain the difference between Cassandra and
Hbase.
But I have several questions. In this blog Jonathan said:
1. Hbase Follows the bigtable
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 9:29 PM, dir dir sikerasa...@gmail.com wrote:
I have already read Jonathan Ellis's Blog today
(http://spyced.blogspot.com/2009/03/why-i-like-cassandra.html)
in this blog, Jonathan tried to explain the difference between Cassandra and
Hbase.
But I have several
14 matches
Mail list logo
