I'm pretty sure that was a bug fixed in a later 0.6.x release so you might be
able to upgrade and the exceptions might go away. We run 0.6.13 with a minor
mod to support data expiration and will probably do so indefinitely since there
no way to upgrade without shutting our site down :(
--
Anthony Molinaro antho...@alumni.caltech.edu
Pelops.
Has anyone done a similar upgrade of a live cluster? How did you go about?
Is there at least a way to avoid having to upgrade both server side and
client side simultaneously?
Thanks,
Daniel
--
Anthony
, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:04:54PM +, Aaron Morton wrote:
Your right, forgot about the change to binary keys :)
Forgot what I said.
A
On 20 Jan, 2011,at 11:01 AM, Anthony Molinaro antho...@alumni.caltech.edu
wrote:
As far as I can tell, it is impossible to run a 0.6 client against
Really, my bad, I though they were, but maybe I'm confusing that with
protobuf, I work with too many serialization formats :(.
-Anthony
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 04:46:48PM -0600, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Anthony Molinaro
antho...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote
the clients and the server.
-Anthony
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 05:05:02PM -0800, Anthony Molinaro wrote:
Really, my bad, I though they were, but maybe I'm confusing that with
protobuf, I work with too many serialization formats :(.
-Anthony
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 04:46:48PM -0600, Jonathan Ellis
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 05:31:28PM -0700, Dave Viner wrote:
Has anyone found solid step-by-step docs on how to raid0 the ephemeral disks
in ec2 for use by Cassandra?
No, but here's a script I used to raid0 3 ephemerals in an xlarge instance.
You can edit the top part for different configs for
--
Anthony Molinaro antho...@alumni.caltech.edu
be able to use those public addresses
to migrate to some other site outside of EC2.
Am I missing something obvious? (Quite possible, since I haven't actually
tested this)
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 01:09:46PM -0500, Anthony Molinaro wrote:
Hi,
We're running cassandra 0.6.4, and need
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 12:20:10PM -0700, Benjamin Black wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Anthony Molinaro
antho...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:
I don't know it seems to tax our setup of 39 extra large ec2 nodes, its
also closer to 24000 reqs/sec at peak since there are different
?
--
Anthony Molinaro antho...@alumni.caltech.edu
--
Anthony Molinaro antho...@alumni.caltech.edu
.
Any chance you could apply the patch for 1221 and test?
Gary.
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 16:45, Anthony Molinaro
antho...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:
I see this in the old nodes
DEBUG [WRITE-/10.220.198.15] 2010-07-20 21:15:50,366
OutboundTcpConnection.java (line 142) attempting to connect
the system keyspace first, just in case.
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Anthony Molinaro
antho...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:
Yeah, I tried all that already and it didn't seem to work, no new nodes
will bootstrap, which makes me think there's some saved state somewhere,
preventing a new node
for me.
1. Restart the bootstraping node
2. If I see streaming 0/ I restart the node and all the streaming nodes
3. Restart all the nodes
4. If there is data in the bootstraing node I delete it before I restart.
Good luck
Shimi
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Anthony Molinaro
antho
--
Anthony Molinaro antho...@alumni.caltech.edu
to bootstrap to. Who owns the
ranges that contain those tokens?
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Anthony Molinaro
antho...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:
Hi,
I have a 0.6.3 cluster which contains 6 nodes. I added 6 new nodes
by setting AutoBootstrap to true and setting an InitialToken
Oh, and looking at the load on the new machines it appears that
New 2 and New 6 have gotten some data (although neither is in the ring
yet). Not sure if that clears anything up though.
-Anthony
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 01:28:06PM -0700, Anthony Molinaro wrote:
This is a cluster which
, 2010 at 03:43:49PM -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Anthony Molinaro
antho...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:
Is the fact that 2 new nodes are in the range messing it up?
Probably.
And if so
how do I recover (I'm thinking, shutdown new nodes 2,3,4,5
be looking
at?
Thanks,
-Anthony
--
Anthony Molinaro antho...@alumni.caltech.edu
(US-EAST), cuz they can communicate
with private IP. Can any one share What is the recommended approach here?
Lenin
--
twitter: leningali
skype: galilenin
Cell:513.382.3371
--
Anthony Molinaro
?
Thanks,
-Anthony
--
Anthony Molinaro antho...@alumni.caltech.edu
MessageDeserializer
had that message). Do gossip messages flow through the MessageDeserializer?
Thanks for the response,
-Anthony
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Anthony Molinaro
antho...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed I have lots of these messages
INFO [GMFD:1] 2010
be causing this sort of thing?
This cluster is now at 27 m1.xlarge boxes on ec2 running 0.6.2 of some flavor.
Thanks,
-Anthony
--
Anthony Molinaro antho...@alumni.caltech.edu
--
Anthony Molinaro antho...@alumni.caltech.edu
,
--
Anthony Molinaro antho...@alumni.caltech.edu
--
Anthony Molinaro antho...@alumni.caltech.edu
,
value = value,
timestamp = 2
}
}
}
]
}
},
Try that,
-Anthony
--
Anthony Molinaro antho...@alumni.caltech.edu
down. The seed node has all nodes.
Anyone seen this? How can I get those 4 nodes to see the missing node?
If a known issue has it been fixed in 0.6 or newer?
Thanks,
-Anthony
--
Anthony Molinaro
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:41:17PM -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Anthony Molinaro
antho...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:
Some nodes appear in the ring from some nodes, but not others. Right
now I have 14 nodes, 10 of those nodes have the same output
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 01:17:21PM -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Anthony Molinaro
antho...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:
I'm not sure how it would get this, maybe I need to restart my seed node?
It's worth a try. Sounds like you found an unusual bug in gossip
:11PM -0700, Anthony Molinaro wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 01:17:21PM -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Anthony Molinaro
antho...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:
I'm not sure how it would get this, maybe I need to restart my seed node?
It's worth a try. Sounds
the
sstables while the system was running (since they shouldn't be changing).
Then in quick succession removetoken and bootstrap with the old token.
Probably grasping at straws here :b
Thanks for the answers,
-Anthony
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Anthony Molinaro
antho
at 4:57 PM, Anthony Molinaro
antho...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:
Hi,
I have a cassandra cluster where a couple things are happening. Every
once in a while a node will start to get backed up. Checking tpstats I
see a very large value for ROW-MUTATION-STAGE. Sometimes it will be able
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:52:32PM -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Anthony Molinaro
antho...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:
as for why it backs up in the first place before the restart, you can
either (a) throttle writes [set your timeout lower, make your clients
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:05:07PM -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Anthony Molinaro
antho...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:08:19AM -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
Yes, that looks right, where token really close means slightly less
than
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 01:24:45PM -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Anthony Molinaro
antho...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:
Interesting, in the config I see
!-- Time to wait for a reply from other nodes before failing the command
--
RpcTimeoutInMillis5000
= false, what happens?
Does it join the ring but without data and without token range?
Can I then 'nodeprobe move token for range I want to take over', and
achieve the same as step 2 above?
Thanks,
-Anthony
--
Anthony Molinaro
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:54:51AM -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Anthony Molinaro
antho...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:
This is sort of a pre-emptive question as the compaction I'm doing hasn't
failed yet but I expect it to any time now. I have a cluster which
39 matches
Mail list logo
