/2011 02:41, Ed Anuff wrote:
1) The index updates should be eventually consistent. This does mean
that you can get a transient false-positive on your search results.
If this doesn't work for you, then you either need to use ZK or some
other locking solution or do read repair by making sure
1) The index updates should be eventually consistent. This does mean
that you can get a transient false-positive on your search results.
If this doesn't work for you, then you either need to use ZK or some
other locking solution or do read repair by making sure that the row
you retrieve contains
This is basically what entity groups are about -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1684
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 5:26 AM, Peter Lin wool...@gmail.com wrote:
This feature interests me, so I thought I'd add some comments.
Having used partition features in existing databases like DB2,
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Radim Kolar h...@sendmail.cz wrote:
- support for atomic operations or batches (if QUORUM fails, data should not
be visible with ONE)
zookeeper is solving that.
I'd like to see official support for Zookeeper inside of Cassandra.
I'd like it to be something that
It was developed for 0.7x but we then made a few changes so that it
would work with 0.8-rc1 that broke the 0.7 compatibility. The idea at
the time was to do a 0.7 branch for it but it looks like that never
got checked in. If you roll back to the previous commit it should
give you a version that
I'm looking at the scenario of how to keep track of the number of
unique visitors within a given time period. Inserting user ids into a
wide row would allow me to have a list of every user within the time
period that the row represented. My experience in the past was that
using get_count on a
to make each query for
the count a bit faster.
Depending on how often this query would be hit, I would still
recommend caching, but you could calculate reality a little more
often.
Zach
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Ed Anuff e...@anuff.com wrote:
I'm looking at the scenario of how
I made mention of this during my presentation at the Cassandra Summit
back in July, but we're finally ready to release the source for
Usergrid. This is a mobile platform stack built on top of Cassandra
and using Hector and we're making the full source code available on
GitHub. We'll be offering
/8/24 Ryan King r...@twitter.com
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Alvin UW alvi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
As mentioned by Ed Anuff in his blog and slides, one way to build
customized
secondary index is:
We use one CF, each row to represent a secondary index, with the
secondary
index
name. This will ensure that your index is evenly
distributed throughout your cluster.
- Original Message -
From: Ed Anuff e...@anuff.com
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 12:48:49 PM
Subject: Re: Customized Secondary Index Schema
How many unique last names
I believe you can set start to be ABC_ and finish to be ABC_\ (for
UTF8) to get everything that contains exactly ABC_ and set finish to
ABC_\ to get everything that starts with ABC_. You probably want to
do a simple string comparison test to verify.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Tyler
Awesome, great news!
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Lynn Bender line...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings all,
I just wanted to send a note out to let everyone know about Planet
Cassandra -- an aggregation site for Cassandra news and blogs. Andrew
Llavore from DataStax and I built the site.
We
That's a work in progress and actually represents the next generation of JPA
in Hector. There is a more lightweight version present in the release
version of Hector called Hector Object Mapper. I'm sure Nate or Todd who've
worked more on hector-jpa can elaborate.
Ed
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 2:58
now? The data nucleus plugin? I
don't need the query parts or anything, I just don't want to do have
to translate columns to java fields and vice versa
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Ed Anuff e...@anuff.com wrote:
That's a work in progress and actually represents the next generation of
JPA
, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
Default stack is huge, so maven-ant-tasks-retrieve-build is probably
recursing infinitely somewhere :(
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Ed Anuff e...@anuff.com wrote:
I finally got around to getting Eclipse set up to build Cassandra
following the directions
I finally got around to getting Eclipse set up to build Cassandra
following the directions on the wiki and it seems to be working,
Eclipse isn't showing any errors except that when it fires off the
automatic ant build I get the following error:
maven-ant-tasks-retrieve-build:
BUILD FAILED
Sounds like the problem might be on the hector side. Lots of hector
users on this list, but usually not a bad idea to ask on
hector-us...@googlegroups.com (cc'd).
The jetty servers stopping responding is a bit vague, somewhere in
your logs is an error message that should shed some light on where
If you're just indexing on a single column value and the values have
low cardinality in, say, the 10's - I'd have a wide row for each
cardinal value that contained the set of keys for rows that contained
that value. For higher levels of cardinality or if you're indexing on
multiple columns, there
Hmm, if you're really doing this, you're not getting a time uuid:
UUID timeUUID = getTimeUUID().randomUUID();
That call to randomUUID() is invoking the static randomUUID() method
in java.util.UUID which is generating a non-time random uuid. I'm not
sure why you're getting that error message
for another), multiple columns need to be indexed,
needs sorted order.
Hope that amazon paper has some good tips on solving the transactional
gotcha :-)
-Adi
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Ed Anuff e...@anuff.com wrote:
If you're just indexing on a single column value and the values have
Силка sylkaa...@gmail.com:
Then how i can generate correct time UUID key in java ?
8 квітня 2011 р. 22:58 Ed Anuff e...@anuff.com написав:
Hmm, if you're really doing this, you're not getting a time uuid:
UUID timeUUID = getTimeUUID().randomUUID();
That call to randomUUID() is invoking
UUID timeUUID = getTimeUUID(); doesn't solve my problem.
9 квітня 2011 р. 01:16 Ed Anuff e...@anuff.com написав:
Oops, I should have been more clear. You have this code:
UUID timeUUID = getTimeUUID().randomUUID();
what you need is this code:
UUID timeUUID = getTimeUUID();
What I meant
My concern when I see something like this is it might cause developers
on the project to get worried and start to try to solve the wrong
problems. Cassandra is not going to be as easy as Mongo, certainly
not any time soon. CQL won't do it, although it will help. This
isn't a criticism of
If I understand the question, it's not that
UUIDGen.makeType1UUIDFromHost(InetAddress.getLocalHost()) is returning
duplicate UUID's. It should always be giving unique time-based uuids
and has checks to make sure it does. The question was whether it was
possible to get multiple unique time-based
the same millisecond, then the ordering
is not preserved)
- Drew
On Mar 30, 2011, at 4:13 PM, Ed Anuff wrote:
If I understand the question, it's not that
UUIDGen.makeType1UUIDFromHost(InetAddress.getLocalHost()) is returning
duplicate UUID's. It should always be giving unique time-based uuids
It's nice to see some testing in this regard, however, it's worth pointing
out something that gets lost in CF index vs secondary index discussions.
What you're really proving is that get_slice (across columns) is faster than
get_indexed_slices (across keys). For up to a certain size (and it would
that we should design data model such that row keys
actually become columns (and create secondary index) so that the data
retrieval is faster. I am soon setting up big test instances to test
all this.
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Ed Anuff e...@anuff.com wrote:
It's nice to see some testing
If you mean does it make sense to have a CF where each row contains a set of
keys to other rows in another CF, then yes, that's a common design pattern,
although usually it's because you're creating collections of those rows
(i.e. a Groups CF where each row consists of a set of keys to rows in the
It all depends on what you're trying to do. What you're proposing doing, by
defintion, is creating a secondary index. The primary index is your row
key. Depending on the partitioner, it might or might not be a conveniently
iterable index or sorted index. If you need your keys sorted in a
The latest version of the Hector Java client has experimental support for a
virtual keyspaces feature that transparently adds and removes a prefix to
all row keys sent between Hector and Cassandra. There's a small write up of
it here:
https://github.com/rantav/hector/wiki/Virtual-Keyspaces
The
Hi Indika, I've done a lot of work using the keyspace per tenant model, and
I'm seeing big problems with the memory consumption, even though it's
certainly the most clean way to implement it. Luckily, before I used the
keyspace per tenant approach, I'd implemented my system using a single
it and was helping maintain it before getting pulled off onto other
projects).
On Jan 18, 2011, at 1:12 PM, Ed Anuff wrote:
Hi Indika, I've done a lot of work using the keyspace per tenant model,
and I'm seeing big problems with the memory consumption, even though it's
certainly the most clean
If you go this route, be sure to take a look at the custom column comparator
I wrote to make this sort of thing easier:
https://github.com/edanuff/CassandraCompositeType
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Daniel Lundin d...@eintr.org wrote:
You could also use a standard column family, composing
It's hard to tell without knowing the the nature of the data you're writing,
but you might want to think about whether you can embed any sort of version
number and/or checksum into the column names of the chunk columns. That
way, you could very easily determine that the data you wanted to
Seeing this error on the latest build with code that worked fine
previously. Any ideas?
2010-08-27 17:24:45,037 ERROR (pool-1-thread-2)
[org.apache.cassandra.thrift.Cassandra$Processor] - Internal error
processing get_indexed_slices
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
Never mind, did an ant clean and then rebuilt and it looks fine now.
Ed
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Ed Anuff e...@anuff.com wrote:
Seeing this error on the latest build with code that worked fine
previously. Any ideas?
2010-08-27 17:24:45,037 ERROR (pool-1-thread-2
I'm finding that once I add an index to a column family that I start getting
exceptions as I try to add rows to it. It works fine if I don't define the
column metadata. Any ideas what would cause this?
ERROR 12:44:21,477 Error in ThreadPoolExecutor
java.lang.RuntimeException:
Yup, that's it, r986486 on Table.java made the problem go away, talk about
great timing :)
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:04 -0700, Ed Anuff wrote:
I'm finding that once I add an index to a column family that I start
:42 PM, Ed Anuff wrote:
Sorry, missed that. I'm not sure if there's a cleaner way than using the
approaches you've looked at, hopefully someone else has an answer. How big
is N and do you need to keep more than N around?
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 10:26 AM, William Ashley wash...@gmail.com wrote
, Ed Anuff e...@anuff.com wrote:
It might make sense to create a CompositeType subclass of AbstractType for
the purpose of constructing and comparing these types of composite column
names so that if you could more easily do that sort of thing rather than
having to concatenate into one big string
Assuming a ColumnFamily with a CompareWith of TimeUUIDType, is it possible
to call get_slice with an arbitrary date range? How would valid values for
the start and finish attributes of the slice range be constructed?
Thanks
Ed
Yes, Lucas was correct about the nature of my original question. I'm glad
to hear that Justin's solution works, it makes for a much simpler schema.
Ed
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Lucas Di Pentima
lu...@di-pentima.com.arwrote:
El 27/04/2010, a las 18:23, Lee Parker escribió:
I have
42 matches
Mail list logo
