On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:59 AM, Zhu Han schumi@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Germán Kondolf german.kond...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yes, that's what I meant, but correct me if I'm wrong, when a deletion
comes after another deletion for the same row or column will the gc
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Germán Kondolf
german.kond...@gmail.com wrote:
As the original example depicted clearly:
day 1 - insert Row1.Col1
day 2 - delete Row1.Col1
day 11 (before gc-grace-seconds) - delete Row1
Maybe it could be taken into account when the compaction is executed,
if I only have a consecutive list of uninterrupted tombstones it could
only care about the first. It sounds like the-way-it-should-be, maybe
as a part of the row-reduce process.
Is it feasible? Looking into the CASSANDRA-1074
timestamp against the gc-grace-seconds when is reducing
compacting.
// Germán Kondolf
http://twitter.com/germanklf
http://code.google.com/p/seide/
// @i4
On 19/01/2011, at 00:16, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
If you mean that multiple tombstones for the same row or column should
be merged
Hmm... what about just paying for it?
It cost less than $20 on Amazon for the Kindle version...
(http://www.amazon.com/Cassandra-Definitive-Guide-Eben-Hewitt/dp/1449390412).
// Germán Kondolf
http://twitter.com/germanklf
http://code.google.com/p/seide/
// @iPad
On 30/12/2010, at 01:26, asil
Be careful with the unlimited value on ulimit, you could end up with a
unresponsive server... I mean, you could not even connect via ssh if you
don't have enough handles.
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Amin Sakka, Novapost
amin.sa...@novapost.fr wrote:
I increased the amount of the allowed
Indeed Hector has a connection pool behind it, I think it uses 50
connectios per node.
But also uses a node to discover the others, I assume that, as I saw
connections from my app to nodes that I didn't configure in Hector.
So, you may check the fds in OS level to see if there is a bottleneck
Hi, I'm using it as a complement of cassandra, to avoid duplicate
searches and duplicate content in a given moment in time.
It works really nice by now, no critical issues, at least the
functionallity I'm using from it.
--
//GK
german.kond...@gmail.com
// sites
http://twitter.com/germanklf
I don't know much about Zookeeper, but as far as I read, it is out of
JVM process.
Hazelcast is just a framework and you can programmatically start and
shutdown the cluster, it's just an xml to configure it.
Hazelcast also provides good caching features to integrate with
Hibernate, distributed
