On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Josh Dzielak j...@keen.io wrote:
I have a system where a client sends me arbitrary JSON events containing a
timestamp at millisecond resolution. The timestamp is used to generate
column names of type TimeUUIDType.
The problem I run into is this - if I client
on the requested time range (you must choose the interval as part of
your design, and stick with it). You do not need a secondary index.
On Saturday, March 16, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Philip O'Toole wrote:
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Josh Dzielak j...@keen.io wrote:
I have a system where a client sends
, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Philip O'Toole wrote:
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Josh Dzielak j...@keen.io wrote:
Thanks Philip. I see where you are coming from; that'd be much simpler and
avoid these bumps.
The only downside is that I'd have to separately maintain an index of event
timestamps
You can consider using a WAN optimization appliance such as a Riverbed
Steelhead to significantly speed up your transfers, though that will cost. It
is a common approach to speed up inter-datacenter transfers. Steelheads for the
AWS EC2 cloud are also available.
(Disclaimer: I used to write
?
I am relatively new to Java and Astyanax too, and created a set up for
exactly this purpose. You can learn what I did here:
http://www.philipotoole.com/bootstrapping-cassandra
Not the most elegant, but I wanted to get some stuff up-and-running quickly.
Thanks.
--
Philip O'Toole
Senior
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Hiller, Dean dean.hil...@nrel.gov wrote:
I didn't need to compile it. It is up in the maven repositories as we
http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.netflix.astyanax/astyanax
Actually, yeah, that's what I ended up doing with my ghetto set up
too, but I did
Cool - thanks to all for the replies. I believe I have what I need now.
Philip
On Aug 25, 2012, at 12:17 AM, Guillermo Winkler gwink...@inconcertcc.com
wrote:
Hi Philip,
From http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/ArchitectureOverview
Quorum write: blocks until quorum is reached
By my
Hi Derek -- thanks. More inline.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:52:49PM -0600, Derek Williams wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Philip O'Toole phi...@loggly.com wrote:
But consider this. Say I have a replication factor of 3. I request a
QUORUM write, and it fails because the write only
in practise, but I want to be sure I understand all this.
Perhaps the documentation would be more correct if the statement read as
...reflect the most recent SUCCESSFUL write...?
Thanks,
Philip
--
Philip O'Toole
Senior Developer
Loggly, Inc.
San Francisco, CA
of time? Or only at runtime?
--
Philip O'Toole
Senior Developer
Loggly, Inc.
San Francisco, Calif.
www.loggly.com
10 matches
Mail list logo
