Hi All,
Currently, there are two permissions - read and write, and there is no way
to know the current operation being performed such as add, update, etc. If
the operation is 'add', as the user is already logged into the system, I
would like to authorize the user for the resource going to add. I
probably be a larger patch
than you think.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:54 AM, indika kumara ind...@apache.org wrote:
Hi All,
Currently, there are two permissions - read and write, and there is no way
to know the current operation being performed such as add, update, etc. If
the operation is 'add
Hi All,
I observed the behavior indicated in the subject of this email even the
‘default User’ returned from authentication is null. Is this correct?
Thanks,
Indika
appreciate the suggestions for implementing the aforementioned idea
listed in the wiki.
Thanks,
Indika
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 10:21 PM, indika kumara ind...@apache.org wrote:
Hi All,
I observed the behavior indicated in the subject of this email even the
‘default User’ returned from
on the ClientState. Then your client would not need to
call set_keyspace() . The keyspace has to exist though, it's used it lots of
places to identify the CF
Hope that helps.
Aaron
On 31 Jan, 2011,at 07:18 AM, indika kumara indika.k...@gmail.com wrote:
This issue came when I was trying
it in
the login() function on the ClientState. Then your client would not need to
call set_keyspace() . The keyspace has to exist though, it's used it lots of
places to identify the CF
Hope that helps.
Aaron
On 31 Jan, 2011,at 07:18 AM, indika kumara indika.k...@gmail.com wrote:
This issue
Hi All,
Shouldn't the existing method be changed to the following?
public boolean authorize(AuthenticatedUser user, ListObject resource,
Permission permission); // checks the authority for a given user for a
given resource for a given permission
The existing method:
public EnumSetPermission
Thanks Eric for the clarification.
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 22:45 +0600, indika kumara wrote:
Shouldn't the existing method be changed to the following?
public boolean authorize(AuthenticatedUser user, ListObject
behavior
on the CF level will be stopped at the keyspace and server level before
doing any damage.)
I don't think Cassandra needs to know about end-users. From Cassandra's
point of view the tenant is the user.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:00 AM, indika kumara indika.k...@gmail.comwrote:
+1
before even though it will be built on averages which probably are no so
fine-grained but it can provide worse cases numbers to the application
that uses Cassandra
Thanks,
Miriam
==
Miriam Allalouf
n
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:53 PM, indika kumara indika.k...@gmail.comwrote
Hi all,
Would it be worth the capability of configuring the implementation of the
Cassandra.Iface?. I have to intercept the requests to the Cassandra server
without modifying the existing code (CassandraServer.java). So, the
server-side implementation of the Cassandra.Iface (CassandraServer) need
As the actual problem is mostly related to the number of CFs in the system
(may be number of the columns), I still believe that supporting exposing the
Cassandra ‘as-is’ to a tenant is doable and suitable though need some
fixes. That multi-tenancy model allows a tenant to use the programming
, indika kumara indika.k...@gmail.comwrote:
As the actual problem is mostly related to the number of CFs in the system
(may be number of the columns), I still believe that supporting exposing the
Cassandra ‘as-is’ to a tenant is doable and suitable though need some
fixes. That multi-tenancy
Hi All,
Is there a concept of a session? I would like to log-in(authenticate) one
time into the Cassandra, and then subsequently access the Cassandra without
authenticating again.
Thanks,
Indika
, indika kumara indika.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Is there a concept of a session? I would like to log-in(authenticate) one
time into the Cassandra, and then subsequently access the Cassandra without
authenticating again.
Thanks,
Indika
the documentation here ?
http://www.riptano.com/sites/default/files/hector-v2-client-doc.pdf
(also yes the session is server side, each connection has a thread on the
server it connects to)
Aaron
On 18/01/2011, at 10:40 PM, indika kumara indika.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Aaron,
Thank you
as long as the client
wants it to.
Try the Hector mailing list for details on it's implementation.
Aaron
On 18/01/2011, at 11:15 PM, indika kumara indika.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Aaron... Hector cannot uses strategies such as cookies for
maintaining session, so it has to make
to discussion let's move this to the user list.
A
On 17/01/2011, at 7:44 PM, indika kumara indika.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Stu,
In our app, we would like to offer cassandra 'as-is' to tenants. It that
case, each tenant should be able to create Keyspaces as needed. Based
,
Indika
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 5:26 PM, indika kumara indika.k...@gmail.comwrote:
Moving to user list
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Aaron Morton aa...@thelastpickle.comwrote:
Have a read about JVM heap sizing here
http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/MemtableThresholds
If you let people create
Hi Aaron,
I read some articles about the Cassandra, and now understand a little bit
about trade-offs.
I feel the goal should be to optimize memory as well as performance. I have
to consider the number of column families, the columns per a family, the
number of rows, the memtable’s threshold, and
20 matches
Mail list logo
