I wonder if anyone can use:
* Add logging of GC activity (CASSANDRA-813)
to confirm this:
http://www.slideshare.net/schubertzhang/cassandra-060-insert-throughput
- m.
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hot on the trails of 0.6.0 comes our latest,
work out.
From: Masood Mortazavi [mailto:masoodmortaz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 6:15 AM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org; d...@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: 0.6 insert performance Re: [RELEASE] 0.6.1
I wonder if anyone can use:
* Add logging of GC activity (CASSANDRA-813
4:15 AM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org; d...@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: 0.6 insert performance Re: [RELEASE] 0.6.1
I wonder if anyone can use:
* Add logging of GC activity (CASSANDRA-813)
to confirm this:
http://www.slideshare.net/schubertzhang/cassandra-060-insert-throughput
- m
It's hard to tell from those slides, but it looks like the slowdown
doesn't hit until after several GCs.
Perhaps this is compaction kicking in, not GCs? Definitely the extra
I/O + CPU load from compaction will cause a drop in throughput.
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 6:14 AM, Masood Mortazavi
. It basically kills any kind of soft real time behavior.
*From:* Masood Mortazavi [mailto:masoodmortaz...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Monday, April 19, 2010 4:15 AM
*To:* user@cassandra.apache.org; d...@cassandra.apache.org
*Subject:* 0.6 insert performance Re: [RELEASE] 0.6.1
I wonder if anyone
