RE: GC/CPU increase after upgrading to 3.0.14 (from 2.1.18)

2017-09-26 Thread Steinmaurer, Thomas
except Cassandra binaries have been unchanged in our loadtest environment. Thanks, Thomas From: Alexander Dejanovski [mailto:a...@thelastpickle.com] Sent: Dienstag, 26. September 2017 11:14 To: user@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: GC/CPU increase after upgrading to 3.0.14 (from 2.1.18) Hi

RE: GC/CPU increase after upgrading to 3.0.14 (from 2.1.18)

2017-09-26 Thread Steinmaurer, Thomas
Hi, in our experience CMS is doing much better with smaller heaps. Regards, Thomas From: Matope Ono [mailto:matope@gmail.com] Sent: Dienstag, 26. September 2017 10:58 To: user@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: GC/CPU increase after upgrading to 3.0.14 (from 2.1.18) Hi. We met similar

Re: GC/CPU increase after upgrading to 3.0.14 (from 2.1.18)

2017-09-26 Thread Alexander Dejanovski
is may be. >> >> >> >> Regarding compression metadata memory usage drop. Right, storage engine >> re-write could be a reason. Thanks. >> >> >> >> Still wondering about the GC/CPU increase. >> >> >> >> Thanks! >> >

Re: GC/CPU increase after upgrading to 3.0.14 (from 2.1.18)

2017-09-26 Thread Matope Ono
Thanks for your attention. > > > > Thomas > > > > *From:* Steinmaurer, Thomas [mailto:thomas.steinmau...@dynatrace.com] > *Sent:* Freitag, 15. September 2017 13:51 > *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org > *Subject:* RE: GC/CPU increase after upgrading to 3.0.14 (from 2.1.18) >

RE: GC/CPU increase after upgrading to 3.0.14 (from 2.1.18)

2017-09-25 Thread Steinmaurer, Thomas
: Freitag, 15. September 2017 13:51 To: user@cassandra.apache.org Subject: RE: GC/CPU increase after upgrading to 3.0.14 (from 2.1.18) Hi Jeff, we are using native (CQL3) via Java DataStax driver (3.1). We also have OpsCenter running (to be removed soon) via Thrift, if I remember correctly. As said

RE: GC/CPU increase after upgrading to 3.0.14 (from 2.1.18)

2017-09-18 Thread Steinmaurer, Thomas
in 3.0 in context of CPU/GC and not disk savings? Thanks, Thomas From: Steinmaurer, Thomas [mailto:thomas.steinmau...@dynatrace.com] Sent: Freitag, 15. September 2017 13:51 To: user@cassandra.apache.org Subject: RE: GC/CPU increase after upgrading to 3.0.14 (from 2.1.18) Hi Jeff, we are using

RE: GC/CPU increase after upgrading to 3.0.14 (from 2.1.18)

2017-09-15 Thread Steinmaurer, Thomas
wondering about the GC/CPU increase. Thanks! Thomas From: Jeff Jirsa [mailto:jji...@gmail.com] Sent: Freitag, 15. September 2017 13:14 To: user@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: GC/CPU increase after upgrading to 3.0.14 (from 2.1.18) Most people find 3.0 slightly slower than 2.1. The only thing

Re: GC/CPU increase after upgrading to 3.0.14 (from 2.1.18)

2017-09-15 Thread Jeff Jirsa
Most people find 3.0 slightly slower than 2.1. The only thing that really stands out in your email is the huge change in 95% latency - that's atypical. Are you using thrift or native 9042)? The decrease in compression metadata offheap usage is likely due to the increased storage efficiency of

GC/CPU increase after upgrading to 3.0.14 (from 2.1.18)

2017-09-15 Thread Steinmaurer, Thomas
Hello, we have a test (regression) environment hosted in AWS, which is used for auto deploying our software on a daily basis and attach constant load across all deployments. Basically to allow us to detect any regressions in our software on a daily basis. On the Cassandra-side, this is