? and minute = ?
Sean Durity
From: Reid Pinchback
Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2020 4:10 PM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Running select against cassandra
Abdul,
When in doubt, have a query model that immediately feeds you exactly what you
are looking for. That’s kin
:10 PM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Running select against cassandra
Abdul,
When in doubt, have a query model that immediately feeds you exactly what you
are looking for. That’s kind of the data model philosophy that you want to
shoot for as much as feasible with C
From reports on this mailing list, I do not allow materialized views.
Sean Durity
From: Reid Pinchback
Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2020 4:10 PM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Running select against cassandra
Abdul,
When in doubt, have a query model that immediately
.
You might want a composite partition key for having an efficient selection of
narrow time ranges.
From: Abdul Patel
Reply-To: "user@cassandra.apache.org"
Date: Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 2:42 PM
To: "user@cassandra.apache.org"
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Running sele
this is the schema similar to what we have , they want to get user
connected - concurrent count for every say 1-5 minutes.
i am thinking will simple select will have performance issue or we can go
for materialized views ?
CREATE TABLE usr_session (
userid bigint,
session_usr text,
Do you only need the current count or do you want to keep the historical counts
also? By active users, does that mean some kind of user that the application
tracks (as opposed to the Cassandra user connected to the cluster)?
I would consider a table like this for tracking active users through
