Hi,
Before: 1 cluster with 2 DC. 3 nodes in each DCNow: 1 cluster with 1 DC. 6
nodes in this DC
Is it right?
If yes, depending on the RF - and assuming NetworkTopologyStrategy - I would
do: - RF = 2 => 2 C* rack, one rack in each AZ - RF = 3 => 3 C* rack, one
rack in each AZ
In other words, I
Hi Richard,
It depends on the snitch and the replication strategy in use.
Here's a link to a blogpost about how we deployed C* on 3AZ
http://highscalability.com/blog/2016/8/1/how-to-setup-a-highly-available-multi-az-cassandra-cluster-o.html
Best,
Tommaso
On Mar 7, 2017 18:05, "Ney, Richard"
I'd recommend three availability zones. In this case if you loose one AZ
you still have a quorum (assuming replication factor of 3)
Andrey
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Ney, Richard wrote:
> We’ve collapsed our 2 DC – 3 node Cassandra clusters into a single 6 node
>
We’ve collapsed our 2 DC – 3 node Cassandra clusters into a single 6 node
Cassandra cluster split between two AWS availability zones.
Are there any behaviors we need to take into account to ensure the Cassandra
cluster stability with this configuration?
RICHARD NEY
TECHNICAL DIRECTOR, RESEARCH