On Sun, 2010-07-11 at 01:06 +0530, Sumit Datta wrote:
What I do not see are details as to why Cassandra is not being used to
store tweets. Or the details of the implementation that does have
Cassandra.
I wouldn't let that stop you. You should consider doing what so many
others are: treat all
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Colin Clark
co...@cloudeventprocessing.com wrote:
Although I'm a fan of Cassandra, there's no way I'd use it today for my tier
1 deployments, because I don't have the resources of Facebook, and even
though Cassandra is open source, that doesn't mean I can fix it
It almost seems counter-intuitive. For analytics, you'd think they'd want a
database that supports more sophisticated query functionality (sql). Whereas
for everyday tweet storage, something fast and high-throughput (cassandra)
makes sense.
I'd be curious to here the details as well.
On Sat, Jul
This sounds more like high-throughput external analytics, aka they
will know all the queries consumers will use. This isn't for internal
analytics.
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Marty Greenia martygree...@gmail.com wrote:
It almost seems counter-intuitive. For analytics, you'd think they'd
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Marty Greenia martygree...@gmail.com wrote:
It almost seems counter-intuitive. For analytics, you'd think they'd want a
database that supports more sophisticated query functionality (sql). Whereas
for everyday tweet storage, something fast and high-throughput
I'm not aware of anyone classifying what twitter is doing today as
'working.' In fact, I believe that twitter's problems are much larger
than just technology but that's a whole different subject.
What twitter may have realized is that they don't have the resources of
Facebook, that
Hello,
I have been a silent spectator in this list for a long while, and
while I like reading much mail traffic, this one I thought I should
reply to.
You know what I see in all this? More Twitter and Facebook than
Cassandra. Are we here to discuss them or the software?
What I do not see are
Idunno, I think understanding those companies' decisions is extremely
relevant for anybody working with cassandra. I really like this thread and
hope it keeps going.
On Jul 10, 2010 3:38 PM, Sumit Datta sumitda...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have been a silent spectator in this list for a long
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 01:06:31AM +0530, Sumit Datta wrote:
Hello,
I have been a silent spectator in this list for a long while, and
while I like reading much mail traffic, this one I thought I should
reply to.
You know what I see in all this? More Twitter and Facebook than
Cassandra. Are
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Colin Clark
co...@cloudeventprocessing.com wrote:
Although I'm a fan of Cassandra, there's no way I'd use it today for my tier
1 deployments, because I don't have the resources of Facebook, and even
though Cassandra is open source, that doesn't mean I can fix
Benjamin,
Please see below - it sounds like you're taking this a little personally
and I'm not sure why. You've made some errors in your reply.
Colin
+1 315 886 3422 cella
+1 701 212 4314 office
http://blog.cloudeventprocessing.com
http://twitter.com/EventCloudPro
t is ardently discussing @http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1502756
Here are my comments:
1. Cassandra is very young! Especially, the design and implementation of
local storage and local indexing are junior and not good.
2. Pool read-performance is also due to the poor local storage
A good read.
http://techcrunch.com/2010/07/09/twitter-analytics-mysql/
Todd
13 matches
Mail list logo
