Re: compaction with LCS

2015-10-11 Thread Anishek Agarwal
Anyone has seen similar behavior with LCS, please do let me know, It will be good to know this can happen. On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Anishek Agarwal wrote: > Looks like some of the nodes have higher sstables on L0 and compaction is > running there, so only few nodes run compaction at a ti

Re: compaction with LCS

2015-10-09 Thread Anishek Agarwal
Looks like some of the nodes have higher sstables on L0 and compaction is running there, so only few nodes run compaction at a time and the preference is given to lower level nodes for compaction before going to higher levels ? so is compaction cluster aware then ? On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 5:17 PM,

compaction with LCS

2015-10-09 Thread Anishek Agarwal
hello, on doing cfstats for the column family i see SSTables in each level: [1, 10, 109/100, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] i thought compaction would trigger since the 3rd level tables are move than expected number, but on doing compactionstats its shows "n/a" -- any reason why its not triggering, should i