Thanks Adam, that's good to know.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Adam Holmberg
wrote:
> The referenced article is accurate as far as NULL is concerned, but please
> also note that there is now the ability to specify UNSET to avoid
> unnecessary tombstones (as of
The referenced article is accurate as far as NULL is concerned, but please
also note that there is now the ability to specify UNSET to avoid
unnecessary tombstones (as of Cassandra 2.2.0):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7304
Adam
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Henry M
Thank you. It's probably not specific to prepared statements then and just
a more general statement. That makes sense.
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 10:06 AM Steve Robenalt
wrote:
> Hi Henry,
>
> I would suspect that the tombstones are necessary to overwrite any
> previous
Hi Henry,
I would suspect that the tombstones are necessary to overwrite any previous
values in the null'd columns. Since Cassandra avoids read-before-write,
there's no way to be sure that the nulls were not intended to remove any
such previous values, so the tombstones insure that they don't
The following article makes the following statement which I am trying to
understand:
*"Cassandra’s storage engine is optimized to avoid storing unnecessary
empty columns, but when using prepared statements those parameters that are
not provided result in null values being passed to Cassandra (and