What is the cardinality like on these indexes? Can you provide the
schema creation for these two column families?
This is the schema of the CFs:
create column family CF_users
with comparator = UTF8Type
and column_metadata =
[
@Bryan
Other space is used but can be more easily controlled by tuning for
- memtable
- compaction
- key cache
- *row cache*
Isn't row cache stored off-heap since a while ?
2013/1/31 Bryan Talbot btal...@aeriagames.com
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Guillermo Barbero
Hi, replies to your answers:
The CFs that seems to flush more often (users and messages) do not
have multiget queries...
There are 4 secondary indexes for users and 3 for messages. I've seen
something odd here: the index of the CFs is also stored in a column
AND is also indexed. There isn't any
There are 4 secondary indexes for users and 3 for messages. I've seen
something odd here: the index of the CFs is also stored in a column
AND is also indexed. There isn't any query by that secondary index. I
should probably erase the index, shouldn't I?
What is the cardinality like on these
My guess is that those one or two nodes with the gc pressure also have more
rows in your big CF. More rows could be due to imbalanced distribution if
your'e not using a random partitioner or from those nodes not yet removing
deleted rows which other nodes may have done.
JVM heap space is used
What's the output of nodetool cfstats for those 2 column families on
cassNode2 and cassNode3? And what is the replication factor for this
cluster?
Per the previous reply, nodetool ring should show each of your nodes
with ~16.7% of the data if well balanced.
Also, the auto-detection for memory
Your latencies and distribution look fine.
How big/what types of queries are you issuing? Are you issuing a lot
of large multigets?
Also, do either of these column families have secondary indexes?
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Guillermo Barbero
guillermo.barb...@spotbros.com wrote:
Iep,
