without them overlapping/disturbing each other (assuming that keys lie in
above domains) ?
Not sure what you mean by overlapping.
42 as a int and 42 as a long are the same key.
Cheers
-
Aaron Morton
Freelance Developer
@aaronmorton
http://www.thelastpickle.com
On
I need to use the range beyond the integer32 type range, so I am using
Long to write those keys. I am afraid if this might lead to collisions with
the previously stored integer keys in the same CF even if I leave out the
int32 type range.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:51 PM, aaron morton
Only if you reuse a row key.
Cheers
-
Aaron Morton
Freelance Developer
@aaronmorton
http://www.thelastpickle.com
On 27/03/2012, at 6:38 AM, Ertio Lew wrote:
I need to use the range beyond the integer32 type range, so I am using Long
to write those keys. I am afraid if
Only if you reuse a row key.
Cheers
-
Aaron Morton
Freelance Developer
@aaronmorton
http://www.thelastpickle.com
On 27/03/2012, at 6:38 AM, Ertio Lew wrote:
I need to use the range beyond the integer32 type range, so I am using Long
to write those keys. I am afraid if
I have been writing rows to a CF all with integer(4 byte) keys. So my CF
contains rows with keys in the entire range from Integer.MIN_VALUE to
Integer.MAX_VALUE.
Now I want to store Long type keys as well in this CF **without disturbing
the integer keys. The range of Long type keys would be
