Re: Is it *safe* to issue multiple replace-node at the same time?

It's safe but since the replacement node will stream data from a single replica per local range, it will potentially propagate any inconsistencies from the replica it streams from, so it's recommended to run repair after a replace to reduce entropy specially when replacing a node with the same IP

Re: Is it *safe* to issue multiple replace-node at the same time?

On 21 November 2016 at 18:58, Ben Bromhead wrote: > Same rack and no range movements, my first instinct is to say yes it is > safe (I like to treat racks as one giant meta node). However I would want > to have a read through the replace code. This is assuming RF<=# of

Re: Is it *safe* to issue multiple replace-node at the same time?

Same rack and no range movements, my first instinct is to say yes it is safe (I like to treat racks as one giant meta node). However I would want to have a read through the replace code. On Mon, Nov 21, 2016, 07:22 Dikang Gu wrote: > Hi guys, > > Sometimes we need to replace